学校自杀预防干预:评估证据基础。

IF 3.2
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-04 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20250162
Tina Marshall, John Cosgrove, Melissa Wilson, Tabitha Hoey, Jeffrey Taylor, Sushmita Shoma Ghose, Nikhil A Patel
{"title":"学校自杀预防干预:评估证据基础。","authors":"Tina Marshall, John Cosgrove, Melissa Wilson, Tabitha Hoey, Jeffrey Taylor, Sushmita Shoma Ghose, Nikhil A Patel","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20250162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rates of suicide among youths, both in the United States and globally, remain high. Schools can serve as an important intervention setting for suicide prevention efforts because youths spend a great deal of time in school. This systematic review aimed to examine the level of evidence of specific school-based suicide prevention interventions by using established rating criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of major databases, gray literature, and evidence-based registries was conducted to identify individual studies that focused on suicide prevention interventions within school settings and that were published between 2008 and 2022. The authors rated suicide prevention intervention as having high, moderate, or low levels of evidence; ratings were based on the number and rigor of studies with positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 14 different interventions identified across 14 studies, no intervention had enough studies to be rated as having a high level of evidence; one intervention, Signs of Suicide, was rated as having moderate evidence. Improved outcomes were found for 10 interventions, including reduced suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, suicide planning, and suicidal behavior. Four studies of three interventions found positive effects on mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, and psychological distress. No cost data were found for Signs of Suicide to complete a cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More research is needed to build the evidence base for school-based suicide prevention interventions that demonstrate positive impacts on suicide-related and mental health outcomes. Future research should also examine the cost-effectiveness of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520759,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"898-905"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicide Prevention Interventions in Schools: Assessing the Evidence Base.\",\"authors\":\"Tina Marshall, John Cosgrove, Melissa Wilson, Tabitha Hoey, Jeffrey Taylor, Sushmita Shoma Ghose, Nikhil A Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.ps.20250162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rates of suicide among youths, both in the United States and globally, remain high. Schools can serve as an important intervention setting for suicide prevention efforts because youths spend a great deal of time in school. This systematic review aimed to examine the level of evidence of specific school-based suicide prevention interventions by using established rating criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of major databases, gray literature, and evidence-based registries was conducted to identify individual studies that focused on suicide prevention interventions within school settings and that were published between 2008 and 2022. The authors rated suicide prevention intervention as having high, moderate, or low levels of evidence; ratings were based on the number and rigor of studies with positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 14 different interventions identified across 14 studies, no intervention had enough studies to be rated as having a high level of evidence; one intervention, Signs of Suicide, was rated as having moderate evidence. Improved outcomes were found for 10 interventions, including reduced suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, suicide planning, and suicidal behavior. Four studies of three interventions found positive effects on mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, and psychological distress. No cost data were found for Signs of Suicide to complete a cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More research is needed to build the evidence base for school-based suicide prevention interventions that demonstrate positive impacts on suicide-related and mental health outcomes. Future research should also examine the cost-effectiveness of interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"898-905\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20250162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20250162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:无论是在美国还是在全球,青少年的自杀率都居高不下。学校可以作为预防自杀的重要干预场所,因为青少年在学校花费了大量的时间。本系统综述旨在通过使用已建立的评分标准来检查具体的以学校为基础的自杀预防干预措施的证据水平。方法:对主要数据库、灰色文献和基于证据的登记进行搜索,以确定2008年至2022年间发表的专注于学校环境中自杀预防干预的个体研究。作者将自杀预防干预分为高、中、低三个级别;评分是基于有积极结果的研究的数量和严谨性。结果:在14项研究中确定的14种不同的干预措施中,没有一种干预措施有足够的研究被评为具有高水平的证据;一项干预,自杀的迹象,被评为有中等证据。10项干预措施改善了结果,包括减少自杀意念、自杀企图、自杀计划和自杀行为。三项干预措施的四项研究发现,对抑郁、焦虑和心理困扰等心理健康结果有积极影响。没有发现自杀迹象的成本数据来完成成本分析。结论:需要更多的研究来建立基于学校的自杀预防干预的证据基础,以证明对自杀相关和心理健康结果的积极影响。未来的研究还应检查干预措施的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suicide Prevention Interventions in Schools: Assessing the Evidence Base.

Objective: Rates of suicide among youths, both in the United States and globally, remain high. Schools can serve as an important intervention setting for suicide prevention efforts because youths spend a great deal of time in school. This systematic review aimed to examine the level of evidence of specific school-based suicide prevention interventions by using established rating criteria.

Methods: A search of major databases, gray literature, and evidence-based registries was conducted to identify individual studies that focused on suicide prevention interventions within school settings and that were published between 2008 and 2022. The authors rated suicide prevention intervention as having high, moderate, or low levels of evidence; ratings were based on the number and rigor of studies with positive outcomes.

Results: Of the 14 different interventions identified across 14 studies, no intervention had enough studies to be rated as having a high level of evidence; one intervention, Signs of Suicide, was rated as having moderate evidence. Improved outcomes were found for 10 interventions, including reduced suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, suicide planning, and suicidal behavior. Four studies of three interventions found positive effects on mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, and psychological distress. No cost data were found for Signs of Suicide to complete a cost analysis.

Conclusions: More research is needed to build the evidence base for school-based suicide prevention interventions that demonstrate positive impacts on suicide-related and mental health outcomes. Future research should also examine the cost-effectiveness of interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信