Rachael C Kretsch, Reinhard Albrecht, Ebbe S Andersen, Hsuan-Ai Chen, Wah Chiu, Rhiju Das, Jeanine G Gezelle, Marcus D Hartmann, Claudia Höbartner, Yimin Hu, Shekhar Jadhav, Philip E Johnson, Christopher P Jones, Deepak Koirala, Emil L Kristoffersen, Eric Largy, Anna Lewicka, Cameron D Mackereth, Marco Marcia, Michela Nigro, Manju Ojha, Joseph A Piccirilli, Phoebe A Rice, Heewhan Shin, Anna-Lena Steckelberg, Zhaoming Su, Yoshita Srivastava, Liu Wang, Yuan Wu, Jiahao Xie, Nikolaj H Zwergius, John Moult, Andriy Kryshtafovych
{"title":"结构提供者评估的CASP16核酸预测的功能相关性","authors":"Rachael C Kretsch, Reinhard Albrecht, Ebbe S Andersen, Hsuan-Ai Chen, Wah Chiu, Rhiju Das, Jeanine G Gezelle, Marcus D Hartmann, Claudia Höbartner, Yimin Hu, Shekhar Jadhav, Philip E Johnson, Christopher P Jones, Deepak Koirala, Emil L Kristoffersen, Eric Largy, Anna Lewicka, Cameron D Mackereth, Marco Marcia, Michela Nigro, Manju Ojha, Joseph A Piccirilli, Phoebe A Rice, Heewhan Shin, Anna-Lena Steckelberg, Zhaoming Su, Yoshita Srivastava, Liu Wang, Yuan Wu, Jiahao Xie, Nikolaj H Zwergius, John Moult, Andriy Kryshtafovych","doi":"10.1002/prot.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate biomolecular structure prediction enables the prediction of mutational effects, the speculation of function based on predicted structural homology, the analysis of ligand binding modes, experimental model building, and many other applications. Such algorithms to predict essential functional and structural features remain out of reach for biomolecular complexes containing nucleic acids. Here, we report a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of nucleic acid structures for the CASP16 blind prediction challenge by 12 of the experimental groups who provided nucleic acid targets. Blind predictions accurately model secondary structure and some aspects of tertiary structure, including reasonable global folds for some complex RNAs; however, predictions often lack accuracy in the regions of highest functional importance. All models have inaccuracies in non-canonical regions where, for example, the nucleic-acid backbone bends, deviating from an A-form helix geometry, or a base forms a non-standard hydrogen bond (not a Watson-Crick base pair). These bends and non-canonical interactions are integral to forming functionally important regions such as RNA enzymatic active sites. Additionally, the modeling of conserved and functional interfaces between nucleic acids and ligands, proteins, or other nucleic acids remains poor. For some targets, the experimental structures may not represent the only structure the biomolecular complex occupies in solution or in its functional life cycle, posing a future challenge for the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":56271,"journal":{"name":"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Relevance of CASP16 Nucleic Acid Predictions as Evaluated by Structure Providers.\",\"authors\":\"Rachael C Kretsch, Reinhard Albrecht, Ebbe S Andersen, Hsuan-Ai Chen, Wah Chiu, Rhiju Das, Jeanine G Gezelle, Marcus D Hartmann, Claudia Höbartner, Yimin Hu, Shekhar Jadhav, Philip E Johnson, Christopher P Jones, Deepak Koirala, Emil L Kristoffersen, Eric Largy, Anna Lewicka, Cameron D Mackereth, Marco Marcia, Michela Nigro, Manju Ojha, Joseph A Piccirilli, Phoebe A Rice, Heewhan Shin, Anna-Lena Steckelberg, Zhaoming Su, Yoshita Srivastava, Liu Wang, Yuan Wu, Jiahao Xie, Nikolaj H Zwergius, John Moult, Andriy Kryshtafovych\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prot.70043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate biomolecular structure prediction enables the prediction of mutational effects, the speculation of function based on predicted structural homology, the analysis of ligand binding modes, experimental model building, and many other applications. Such algorithms to predict essential functional and structural features remain out of reach for biomolecular complexes containing nucleic acids. Here, we report a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of nucleic acid structures for the CASP16 blind prediction challenge by 12 of the experimental groups who provided nucleic acid targets. Blind predictions accurately model secondary structure and some aspects of tertiary structure, including reasonable global folds for some complex RNAs; however, predictions often lack accuracy in the regions of highest functional importance. All models have inaccuracies in non-canonical regions where, for example, the nucleic-acid backbone bends, deviating from an A-form helix geometry, or a base forms a non-standard hydrogen bond (not a Watson-Crick base pair). These bends and non-canonical interactions are integral to forming functionally important regions such as RNA enzymatic active sites. Additionally, the modeling of conserved and functional interfaces between nucleic acids and ligands, proteins, or other nucleic acids remains poor. For some targets, the experimental structures may not represent the only structure the biomolecular complex occupies in solution or in its functional life cycle, posing a future challenge for the community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412911/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Functional Relevance of CASP16 Nucleic Acid Predictions as Evaluated by Structure Providers.
Accurate biomolecular structure prediction enables the prediction of mutational effects, the speculation of function based on predicted structural homology, the analysis of ligand binding modes, experimental model building, and many other applications. Such algorithms to predict essential functional and structural features remain out of reach for biomolecular complexes containing nucleic acids. Here, we report a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of nucleic acid structures for the CASP16 blind prediction challenge by 12 of the experimental groups who provided nucleic acid targets. Blind predictions accurately model secondary structure and some aspects of tertiary structure, including reasonable global folds for some complex RNAs; however, predictions often lack accuracy in the regions of highest functional importance. All models have inaccuracies in non-canonical regions where, for example, the nucleic-acid backbone bends, deviating from an A-form helix geometry, or a base forms a non-standard hydrogen bond (not a Watson-Crick base pair). These bends and non-canonical interactions are integral to forming functionally important regions such as RNA enzymatic active sites. Additionally, the modeling of conserved and functional interfaces between nucleic acids and ligands, proteins, or other nucleic acids remains poor. For some targets, the experimental structures may not represent the only structure the biomolecular complex occupies in solution or in its functional life cycle, posing a future challenge for the community.
期刊介绍:
PROTEINS : Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics publishes original reports of significant experimental and analytic research in all areas of protein research: structure, function, computation, genetics, and design. The journal encourages reports that present new experimental or computational approaches for interpreting and understanding data from biophysical chemistry, structural studies of proteins and macromolecular assemblies, alterations of protein structure and function engineered through techniques of molecular biology and genetics, functional analyses under physiologic conditions, as well as the interactions of proteins with receptors, nucleic acids, or other specific ligands or substrates. Research in protein and peptide biochemistry directed toward synthesizing or characterizing molecules that simulate aspects of the activity of proteins, or that act as inhibitors of protein function, is also within the scope of PROTEINS. In addition to full-length reports, short communications (usually not more than 4 printed pages) and prediction reports are welcome. Reviews are typically by invitation; authors are encouraged to submit proposed topics for consideration.