Bradley T Wyman, Dan Adams, Suzanne Hendrix, Jeffrey Groves, Wayne Croft, Noel Ellison, C Warren Olanow, Karl Kieburtz
{"title":"帕金森病患者昼夜节律有效光疗的双盲对照试验","authors":"Bradley T Wyman, Dan Adams, Suzanne Hendrix, Jeffrey Groves, Wayne Croft, Noel Ellison, C Warren Olanow, Karl Kieburtz","doi":"10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite current medical therapy for Parkinson's Disease (PD), many experience persistent motor symptoms and significant unmanaged non-motor issues. Previous studies suggest that light therapy (LT) provides benefits for motor and non-motor features of PD. This study evaluated Circadian Effective LT (CELT) with a spectral band between 460 and 545 nm for the motor and non-motor features of PD. We conducted a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of CELT in people with Parkinson's disease on standard-of-care therapy. Ninety-two participants (45 active, 47 control) were randomized 1:1 to active or control CELT for 1 h each evening for 6 months. Patients were evaluated in their 'ON state'. The mean (SE) change on the primary endpoint of the MDS-UPDRS parts 1-3 was -17.7(2.8) active vs -9.7(3.5) control, for a LSM difference of -8.0 (4.4) (p = 0.074, 95% Confidence Interval: -16.7, 0.8), reflecting a trend toward improvement over control. Key secondary endpoints included PDQ-39 and CGI which favored active treatment (-5.7 ± 2.7; p = 0.038, and -0.4 ± 0.2; p = 0.066 respectively), while PDSS-2 Disturbed Sleep showed no difference between groups. Other secondary endpoints that supported the overall treatment effect of CELT included ESS (-1.52 ± 0.78; p = 0.054) and CGI-E (-0.3 ± 0.2; p = 0.088). Daily LT, with a circadian effective targeted spectrum of light, was well tolerated by PD patients, had no serious adverse effects and showed improvement in both motor and non-motor MDS-UPDRS and other scores. Larger double-blind studies are warranted to further assess the effectiveness of CELT in PD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02175472.</p>","PeriodicalId":19159,"journal":{"name":"Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"e00728"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A double-blind, controlled trial of circadian effective light therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Bradley T Wyman, Dan Adams, Suzanne Hendrix, Jeffrey Groves, Wayne Croft, Noel Ellison, C Warren Olanow, Karl Kieburtz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite current medical therapy for Parkinson's Disease (PD), many experience persistent motor symptoms and significant unmanaged non-motor issues. Previous studies suggest that light therapy (LT) provides benefits for motor and non-motor features of PD. This study evaluated Circadian Effective LT (CELT) with a spectral band between 460 and 545 nm for the motor and non-motor features of PD. We conducted a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of CELT in people with Parkinson's disease on standard-of-care therapy. Ninety-two participants (45 active, 47 control) were randomized 1:1 to active or control CELT for 1 h each evening for 6 months. Patients were evaluated in their 'ON state'. The mean (SE) change on the primary endpoint of the MDS-UPDRS parts 1-3 was -17.7(2.8) active vs -9.7(3.5) control, for a LSM difference of -8.0 (4.4) (p = 0.074, 95% Confidence Interval: -16.7, 0.8), reflecting a trend toward improvement over control. Key secondary endpoints included PDQ-39 and CGI which favored active treatment (-5.7 ± 2.7; p = 0.038, and -0.4 ± 0.2; p = 0.066 respectively), while PDSS-2 Disturbed Sleep showed no difference between groups. Other secondary endpoints that supported the overall treatment effect of CELT included ESS (-1.52 ± 0.78; p = 0.054) and CGI-E (-0.3 ± 0.2; p = 0.088). Daily LT, with a circadian effective targeted spectrum of light, was well tolerated by PD patients, had no serious adverse effects and showed improvement in both motor and non-motor MDS-UPDRS and other scores. Larger double-blind studies are warranted to further assess the effectiveness of CELT in PD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02175472.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e00728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00728\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A double-blind, controlled trial of circadian effective light therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Despite current medical therapy for Parkinson's Disease (PD), many experience persistent motor symptoms and significant unmanaged non-motor issues. Previous studies suggest that light therapy (LT) provides benefits for motor and non-motor features of PD. This study evaluated Circadian Effective LT (CELT) with a spectral band between 460 and 545 nm for the motor and non-motor features of PD. We conducted a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of CELT in people with Parkinson's disease on standard-of-care therapy. Ninety-two participants (45 active, 47 control) were randomized 1:1 to active or control CELT for 1 h each evening for 6 months. Patients were evaluated in their 'ON state'. The mean (SE) change on the primary endpoint of the MDS-UPDRS parts 1-3 was -17.7(2.8) active vs -9.7(3.5) control, for a LSM difference of -8.0 (4.4) (p = 0.074, 95% Confidence Interval: -16.7, 0.8), reflecting a trend toward improvement over control. Key secondary endpoints included PDQ-39 and CGI which favored active treatment (-5.7 ± 2.7; p = 0.038, and -0.4 ± 0.2; p = 0.066 respectively), while PDSS-2 Disturbed Sleep showed no difference between groups. Other secondary endpoints that supported the overall treatment effect of CELT included ESS (-1.52 ± 0.78; p = 0.054) and CGI-E (-0.3 ± 0.2; p = 0.088). Daily LT, with a circadian effective targeted spectrum of light, was well tolerated by PD patients, had no serious adverse effects and showed improvement in both motor and non-motor MDS-UPDRS and other scores. Larger double-blind studies are warranted to further assess the effectiveness of CELT in PD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02175472.
期刊介绍:
Neurotherapeutics® is the journal of the American Society for Experimental Neurotherapeutics (ASENT). Each issue provides critical reviews of an important topic relating to the treatment of neurological disorders written by international authorities.
The Journal also publishes original research articles in translational neuroscience including descriptions of cutting edge therapies that cross disciplinary lines and represent important contributions to neurotherapeutics for medical practitioners and other researchers in the field.
Neurotherapeutics ® delivers a multidisciplinary perspective on the frontiers of translational neuroscience, provides perspectives on current research and practice, and covers social and ethical as well as scientific issues.