{"title":"年轻人对粪便免疫化学测试选择的个体偏好:一个离散选择实验。","authors":"Kailu Wang, Ho-Man Shum, Carrie Ho-Kwan Yam, Shangfeng Tang, Chunyan Li, Yushan Wu, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh","doi":"10.1007/s41669-025-00598-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to quantify the preference of adults below 50 years of age for fecal immunochemical test (FIT) options as screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and its disparities across different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among adults aged < 50 years old in Hong Kong. A mixed logit model and latent class model were used to estimate their preference, taking into account their preference heterogeneity. Marginal willingness-to-pay for changes in the attribute levels was also estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 408 participants with valid responses were included for analysis. The outcomes showed 5.2% of participants would consistently reject all the 20 FIT alternatives presented to them in the DCE survey. Mortality reduction in FIT programs was deemed as the most important attribute, followed by testing frequency, early detection likelihood, familiar physician, and reduction of false positive rate. The FIT acceptance was sensitive to the change of out-of-pocket payment amount. The latent class model showed participants with different ages, educational level, and self-reported health status would have different preferences for FIT attribute levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study showed that most adults below 50 years old would be willing to consider receiving FIT if suitable testing options are available. They are more sensitive to changes in mortality reduction than changes in CRC early detection likelihood, suggesting the former is more important in information dissemination. The impact of out-of-pocket payments for FIT on its acceptance suggests that the introduction of financial subsidies can be considered to improve screening acceptance. The preference heterogeneity highlights the importance of healthcare professionals' understanding of people's values and preferences for decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual Preference for Fecal Immunochemical Test Options among Younger Adults: A Discrete Choice Experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Kailu Wang, Ho-Man Shum, Carrie Ho-Kwan Yam, Shangfeng Tang, Chunyan Li, Yushan Wu, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41669-025-00598-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to quantify the preference of adults below 50 years of age for fecal immunochemical test (FIT) options as screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and its disparities across different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among adults aged < 50 years old in Hong Kong. A mixed logit model and latent class model were used to estimate their preference, taking into account their preference heterogeneity. Marginal willingness-to-pay for changes in the attribute levels was also estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 408 participants with valid responses were included for analysis. The outcomes showed 5.2% of participants would consistently reject all the 20 FIT alternatives presented to them in the DCE survey. Mortality reduction in FIT programs was deemed as the most important attribute, followed by testing frequency, early detection likelihood, familiar physician, and reduction of false positive rate. The FIT acceptance was sensitive to the change of out-of-pocket payment amount. The latent class model showed participants with different ages, educational level, and self-reported health status would have different preferences for FIT attribute levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study showed that most adults below 50 years old would be willing to consider receiving FIT if suitable testing options are available. They are more sensitive to changes in mortality reduction than changes in CRC early detection likelihood, suggesting the former is more important in information dissemination. The impact of out-of-pocket payments for FIT on its acceptance suggests that the introduction of financial subsidies can be considered to improve screening acceptance. The preference heterogeneity highlights the importance of healthcare professionals' understanding of people's values and preferences for decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PharmacoEconomics Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PharmacoEconomics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-025-00598-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-025-00598-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Individual Preference for Fecal Immunochemical Test Options among Younger Adults: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Objectives: This study aims to quantify the preference of adults below 50 years of age for fecal immunochemical test (FIT) options as screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and its disparities across different subgroups.
Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among adults aged < 50 years old in Hong Kong. A mixed logit model and latent class model were used to estimate their preference, taking into account their preference heterogeneity. Marginal willingness-to-pay for changes in the attribute levels was also estimated.
Results: A total of 408 participants with valid responses were included for analysis. The outcomes showed 5.2% of participants would consistently reject all the 20 FIT alternatives presented to them in the DCE survey. Mortality reduction in FIT programs was deemed as the most important attribute, followed by testing frequency, early detection likelihood, familiar physician, and reduction of false positive rate. The FIT acceptance was sensitive to the change of out-of-pocket payment amount. The latent class model showed participants with different ages, educational level, and self-reported health status would have different preferences for FIT attribute levels.
Conclusions: The study showed that most adults below 50 years old would be willing to consider receiving FIT if suitable testing options are available. They are more sensitive to changes in mortality reduction than changes in CRC early detection likelihood, suggesting the former is more important in information dissemination. The impact of out-of-pocket payments for FIT on its acceptance suggests that the introduction of financial subsidies can be considered to improve screening acceptance. The preference heterogeneity highlights the importance of healthcare professionals' understanding of people's values and preferences for decision-making.
期刊介绍:
PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.