体育活动强度不平等指数:运动综合分析的新指标。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of physical activity & health Pub Date : 2025-09-03 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1123/jpah.2025-0127
Huw Summers, Nils Swindell, Chelsea Starbuck, Gareth Stratton
{"title":"体育活动强度不平等指数:运动综合分析的新指标。","authors":"Huw Summers, Nils Swindell, Chelsea Starbuck, Gareth Stratton","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2025-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wearable sensors recording acceleration provide a powerful tool for analysis of physical activity (PA). Continuous, high-rate data acquisition over extended periods gives highly resolved measurement of movement intensity. While increased complexity of PA analytics allows for deeper insight, it brings a challenge to statistical testing, where commonly used approaches require a single defining metric for PA per participant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adapt an econometric measure to obtain a statistical test metric for movement intensity-the intensity inequality index, I≠. This is a \"Gini coefficient for movement\" that quantifies the inequality in distribution of time spent across a range of activity intensity values. The I≠ metric is calculated using a graphical method on plots of cumulative time versus cumulative intensity level. Hypothesis testing of I≠ is performed on 24-hour activity traces of 58 children, aged 7-11 years, to assess statistical differences in PA between typically developing children and those suspected of having developmental coordination disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The I≠ test metric provided high statistical confidence with low sample numbers: P < .05 for n ≥ 30. When differentiating between groups, I≠ halved the sample size required for a statistical power of 80% at α = .05, in comparison to the alternative metrics of intensity gradient or log ratio of minutes at low and moderate to high intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inequality index provides a metric that is based on the accumulated time-counts across an activity intensity distribution. This integrative description of the distribution makes it a powerful statistical metric for PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1322-1331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Intensity Inequality Index for Physical Activity: A New Metric for Integrative Analysis of Movement.\",\"authors\":\"Huw Summers, Nils Swindell, Chelsea Starbuck, Gareth Stratton\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jpah.2025-0127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wearable sensors recording acceleration provide a powerful tool for analysis of physical activity (PA). Continuous, high-rate data acquisition over extended periods gives highly resolved measurement of movement intensity. While increased complexity of PA analytics allows for deeper insight, it brings a challenge to statistical testing, where commonly used approaches require a single defining metric for PA per participant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We adapt an econometric measure to obtain a statistical test metric for movement intensity-the intensity inequality index, I≠. This is a \\\"Gini coefficient for movement\\\" that quantifies the inequality in distribution of time spent across a range of activity intensity values. The I≠ metric is calculated using a graphical method on plots of cumulative time versus cumulative intensity level. Hypothesis testing of I≠ is performed on 24-hour activity traces of 58 children, aged 7-11 years, to assess statistical differences in PA between typically developing children and those suspected of having developmental coordination disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The I≠ test metric provided high statistical confidence with low sample numbers: P < .05 for n ≥ 30. When differentiating between groups, I≠ halved the sample size required for a statistical power of 80% at α = .05, in comparison to the alternative metrics of intensity gradient or log ratio of minutes at low and moderate to high intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inequality index provides a metric that is based on the accumulated time-counts across an activity intensity distribution. This integrative description of the distribution makes it a powerful statistical metric for PA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1322-1331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2025-0127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2025-0127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:记录加速度的可穿戴传感器为分析身体活动(PA)提供了强有力的工具。连续的,高速率的数据采集在延长的时间内提供了高度分辨率的测量运动强度。虽然PA分析的复杂性增加允许更深入的了解,但它给统计测试带来了挑战,其中常用的方法需要为每个参与者的PA定义单个度量。方法:采用计量经济学方法获得运动强度的统计检验指标——强度不平等指数I≠。这是一个“运动的基尼系数”,它量化了在一系列活动强度值上花费的时间分布的不平等。I≠度量是使用图形方法计算累积时间与累积强度水平的图。对58名7-11岁儿童的24小时活动轨迹进行I≠假设检验,以评估正常发育儿童和疑似患有发育协调障碍儿童之间PA的统计差异。结果:I≠检验指标具有较低样本数下的高统计置信度:当n≥30时,P < 0.05。在组间进行区分时,与强度梯度或低强度、中强度到高强度时的分钟对数比等替代指标相比,在α = 0.05时,I≠使统计能力为80%所需的样本量减半。结论:不平等指数提供了一个基于活动强度分布的累积时间计数的度量。这种对分布的综合描述使其成为一个强大的PA统计度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Intensity Inequality Index for Physical Activity: A New Metric for Integrative Analysis of Movement.

Background: Wearable sensors recording acceleration provide a powerful tool for analysis of physical activity (PA). Continuous, high-rate data acquisition over extended periods gives highly resolved measurement of movement intensity. While increased complexity of PA analytics allows for deeper insight, it brings a challenge to statistical testing, where commonly used approaches require a single defining metric for PA per participant.

Methods: We adapt an econometric measure to obtain a statistical test metric for movement intensity-the intensity inequality index, I≠. This is a "Gini coefficient for movement" that quantifies the inequality in distribution of time spent across a range of activity intensity values. The I≠ metric is calculated using a graphical method on plots of cumulative time versus cumulative intensity level. Hypothesis testing of I≠ is performed on 24-hour activity traces of 58 children, aged 7-11 years, to assess statistical differences in PA between typically developing children and those suspected of having developmental coordination disorder.

Results: The I≠ test metric provided high statistical confidence with low sample numbers: P < .05 for n ≥ 30. When differentiating between groups, I≠ halved the sample size required for a statistical power of 80% at α = .05, in comparison to the alternative metrics of intensity gradient or log ratio of minutes at low and moderate to high intensity.

Conclusions: The inequality index provides a metric that is based on the accumulated time-counts across an activity intensity distribution. This integrative description of the distribution makes it a powerful statistical metric for PA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信