家庭照顾者在癌症临床试验决策中的作用范围综述。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Eric C Blackstone, Barbara J Daly, Mark P Aulisio, Jennifer A Dorth, Sana Loue
{"title":"家庭照顾者在癌症临床试验决策中的作用范围综述。","authors":"Eric C Blackstone, Barbara J Daly, Mark P Aulisio, Jennifer A Dorth, Sana Loue","doi":"10.1177/17407745251366317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCancer clinical trials are vital for improving treatments. Clinical trial decision-making has been examined from the perspectives of patients and oncologists, but caregiver perspectives on clinical trials and roles in patient enrollment decisions remain understudied.MethodsThis scoping review assessed the state of current research on caregiver roles in cancer trial enrollment decision-making. A review of empirical literature was conducted in January 2024 using PubMed and Embase. Articles were evaluated using a review instrument to determine the aspect of decision-making evaluated, the roles of caregivers in clinical trial enrollment decision-making, and recommendations based on study results.ResultsA total of 23 articles were included in the review. Studies focused on awareness and attitudes about clinical trials (7 articles), hypothetical willingness to participate in a trial (6 articles), and experiences with decision-making (10 articles). Caregiver roles included supporting and deferring to patient autonomy, communicating with clinicians, and taking on burden to facilitate participation in the trial. Researchers recommended including caregivers in clinical trial enrollment discussions and educational outreach, developing interventions to reduce caregiver burden, and future research on caregiver clinical trial decision-making using the framework of relational autonomy.ConclusionEmpirical research on caregiver roles in clinical trial enrollment decision-making is limited. Findings of this review suggest that caregivers experience tension between their perceived role of supporting the patient's autonomy and their own well-being. More research is needed to understand how caregivers navigate these challenges and identify best practices for their inclusion in clinical trial consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":10685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"17407745251366317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoping review of family caregiver roles in cancer clinical trial decision-making.\",\"authors\":\"Eric C Blackstone, Barbara J Daly, Mark P Aulisio, Jennifer A Dorth, Sana Loue\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17407745251366317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundCancer clinical trials are vital for improving treatments. Clinical trial decision-making has been examined from the perspectives of patients and oncologists, but caregiver perspectives on clinical trials and roles in patient enrollment decisions remain understudied.MethodsThis scoping review assessed the state of current research on caregiver roles in cancer trial enrollment decision-making. A review of empirical literature was conducted in January 2024 using PubMed and Embase. Articles were evaluated using a review instrument to determine the aspect of decision-making evaluated, the roles of caregivers in clinical trial enrollment decision-making, and recommendations based on study results.ResultsA total of 23 articles were included in the review. Studies focused on awareness and attitudes about clinical trials (7 articles), hypothetical willingness to participate in a trial (6 articles), and experiences with decision-making (10 articles). Caregiver roles included supporting and deferring to patient autonomy, communicating with clinicians, and taking on burden to facilitate participation in the trial. Researchers recommended including caregivers in clinical trial enrollment discussions and educational outreach, developing interventions to reduce caregiver burden, and future research on caregiver clinical trial decision-making using the framework of relational autonomy.ConclusionEmpirical research on caregiver roles in clinical trial enrollment decision-making is limited. Findings of this review suggest that caregivers experience tension between their perceived role of supporting the patient's autonomy and their own well-being. More research is needed to understand how caregivers navigate these challenges and identify best practices for their inclusion in clinical trial consent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17407745251366317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745251366317\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745251366317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症临床试验对改善治疗至关重要。临床试验决策已经从患者和肿瘤学家的角度进行了检查,但护理人员对临床试验的观点和在患者入组决策中的作用仍未得到充分研究。方法本综述评估了护理人员在癌症试验入组决策中的作用的研究现状。2024年1月,我们使用PubMed和Embase对实证文献进行了回顾。文章评估使用回顾工具来确定决策评估的方面,护理人员在临床试验入组决策中的作用,并根据研究结果提出建议。结果共纳入23篇文献。研究集中在对临床试验的认识和态度(7篇文章)、参与试验的假设意愿(6篇文章)和决策经验(10篇文章)。护理人员的角色包括支持和尊重患者的自主权,与临床医生沟通,并承担负担,以促进参与试验。研究人员建议将护理人员纳入临床试验招募讨论和教育推广,开发干预措施以减轻护理人员负担,以及使用关系自主框架对护理人员临床试验决策的未来研究。结论护理人员角色在临床试验入组决策中的实证研究有限。本综述的研究结果表明,护理人员在支持患者自主和自身福祉的感知角色之间经历紧张。需要更多的研究来了解护理人员如何应对这些挑战,并确定将其纳入临床试验同意的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scoping review of family caregiver roles in cancer clinical trial decision-making.

BackgroundCancer clinical trials are vital for improving treatments. Clinical trial decision-making has been examined from the perspectives of patients and oncologists, but caregiver perspectives on clinical trials and roles in patient enrollment decisions remain understudied.MethodsThis scoping review assessed the state of current research on caregiver roles in cancer trial enrollment decision-making. A review of empirical literature was conducted in January 2024 using PubMed and Embase. Articles were evaluated using a review instrument to determine the aspect of decision-making evaluated, the roles of caregivers in clinical trial enrollment decision-making, and recommendations based on study results.ResultsA total of 23 articles were included in the review. Studies focused on awareness and attitudes about clinical trials (7 articles), hypothetical willingness to participate in a trial (6 articles), and experiences with decision-making (10 articles). Caregiver roles included supporting and deferring to patient autonomy, communicating with clinicians, and taking on burden to facilitate participation in the trial. Researchers recommended including caregivers in clinical trial enrollment discussions and educational outreach, developing interventions to reduce caregiver burden, and future research on caregiver clinical trial decision-making using the framework of relational autonomy.ConclusionEmpirical research on caregiver roles in clinical trial enrollment decision-making is limited. Findings of this review suggest that caregivers experience tension between their perceived role of supporting the patient's autonomy and their own well-being. More research is needed to understand how caregivers navigate these challenges and identify best practices for their inclusion in clinical trial consent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Trials
Clinical Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Trials is dedicated to advancing knowledge on the design and conduct of clinical trials related research methodologies. Covering the design, conduct, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of key methodologies, the journal remains on the cusp of the latest topics, including ethics, regulation and policy impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信