优化住院痴呆症患者安全的人工智能方法。

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lauren Bangerter, Allan Fong, Garrett Zabala, Yijung K Kim, Azade Tabaie, Nicole E Werner, Karl Eric De Jonge, Raj M Ratwani
{"title":"优化住院痴呆症患者安全的人工智能方法。","authors":"Lauren Bangerter, Allan Fong, Garrett Zabala, Yijung K Kim, Azade Tabaie, Nicole E Werner, Karl Eric De Jonge, Raj M Ratwani","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study is to develop a machine learning (ML) model to identify contributing factors to dementia-related safety events using patient safety event report data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study uses dementia-related safety event reports from a patient safety reporting system of a 10-hospital health system in the USA. Contributing factors to safety events were coded using the Yorkshire contributory factors framework based on free-text descriptions in the reports. The coded event reports were used to develop two ML models using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), one to classify situational patient factors and another to classify active failures relating to human error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We used 1387 safety event reports for model development, 989 (71.3%) reports related to situational factors and 119 (8.6%) reports related to active failures. The model for situational factors achieved a precision of 0.843 and a recall of 0.826. The F1 score was 0.834, indicating a balance of precision and recall performance. The specificity of the model was 0.639 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) was 0.833. The final model for active failure achieved a precision of 0.333 and a recall of 0.056. The F1 score was 0.095, reflective of imbalanced precision and recall performance. The specificity of the model was 0.992, indicating a strong ability to identify negative cases, and the ROC AUC was 0.817.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML techniques can provide insights into situational factors and active failures that drive dementia-related safety events. These insights can inform targeted interventions such as specialised staff training for behavioural symptoms management and pharmacist-led medication optimisation, to enhance care and safety for hospitalised people living with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence approach to optimise safety for hospitalised patients with dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Bangerter, Allan Fong, Garrett Zabala, Yijung K Kim, Azade Tabaie, Nicole E Werner, Karl Eric De Jonge, Raj M Ratwani\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study is to develop a machine learning (ML) model to identify contributing factors to dementia-related safety events using patient safety event report data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study uses dementia-related safety event reports from a patient safety reporting system of a 10-hospital health system in the USA. Contributing factors to safety events were coded using the Yorkshire contributory factors framework based on free-text descriptions in the reports. The coded event reports were used to develop two ML models using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), one to classify situational patient factors and another to classify active failures relating to human error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We used 1387 safety event reports for model development, 989 (71.3%) reports related to situational factors and 119 (8.6%) reports related to active failures. The model for situational factors achieved a precision of 0.843 and a recall of 0.826. The F1 score was 0.834, indicating a balance of precision and recall performance. The specificity of the model was 0.639 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) was 0.833. The final model for active failure achieved a precision of 0.333 and a recall of 0.056. The F1 score was 0.095, reflective of imbalanced precision and recall performance. The specificity of the model was 0.992, indicating a strong ability to identify negative cases, and the ROC AUC was 0.817.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML techniques can provide insights into situational factors and active failures that drive dementia-related safety events. These insights can inform targeted interventions such as specialised staff training for behavioural symptoms management and pharmacist-led medication optimisation, to enhance care and safety for hospitalised people living with dementia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414173/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是开发一种机器学习(ML)模型,利用患者安全事件报告数据识别痴呆症相关安全事件的影响因素。方法:本研究使用来自美国10家医院卫生系统患者安全报告系统的痴呆症相关安全事件报告。根据报告中的自由文本描述,使用约克郡贡献因素框架对安全事件的贡献因素进行编码。编码的事件报告用于使用极端梯度增强(XGBoost)开发两个ML模型,一个用于对患者情境因素进行分类,另一个用于对与人为错误相关的主动故障进行分类。结果:我们使用了1387份安全事件报告用于模型开发,其中989份(71.3%)报告与情境因素相关,119份(8.6%)报告与主动故障相关。情境因素模型的准确率为0.843,召回率为0.826。F1得分为0.834,表明准确率和召回率达到平衡。该模型的特异性为0.639,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC AUC)为0.833。主动故障的最终模型达到了0.333的精度和0.056的召回率。F1得分为0.095,反映了查准率和查全率不平衡。模型的特异性为0.992,阴性病例的识别能力较强,ROC AUC为0.817。结论:机器学习技术可以深入了解驱动痴呆相关安全事件的情境因素和主动失效。这些见解可以为有针对性的干预措施提供信息,例如针对行为症状管理和药剂师主导的药物优化对工作人员进行专门培训,以加强对住院痴呆症患者的护理和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial intelligence approach to optimise safety for hospitalised patients with dementia.

Artificial intelligence approach to optimise safety for hospitalised patients with dementia.

Background: The aim of the study is to develop a machine learning (ML) model to identify contributing factors to dementia-related safety events using patient safety event report data.

Method: This study uses dementia-related safety event reports from a patient safety reporting system of a 10-hospital health system in the USA. Contributing factors to safety events were coded using the Yorkshire contributory factors framework based on free-text descriptions in the reports. The coded event reports were used to develop two ML models using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), one to classify situational patient factors and another to classify active failures relating to human error.

Results: We used 1387 safety event reports for model development, 989 (71.3%) reports related to situational factors and 119 (8.6%) reports related to active failures. The model for situational factors achieved a precision of 0.843 and a recall of 0.826. The F1 score was 0.834, indicating a balance of precision and recall performance. The specificity of the model was 0.639 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) was 0.833. The final model for active failure achieved a precision of 0.333 and a recall of 0.056. The F1 score was 0.095, reflective of imbalanced precision and recall performance. The specificity of the model was 0.992, indicating a strong ability to identify negative cases, and the ROC AUC was 0.817.

Conclusion: ML techniques can provide insights into situational factors and active failures that drive dementia-related safety events. These insights can inform targeted interventions such as specialised staff training for behavioural symptoms management and pharmacist-led medication optimisation, to enhance care and safety for hospitalised people living with dementia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信