评估社区教育计划对黑人社区疫苗素养和接受程度的影响

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir PharmD, MPH, Raheem Abdul-Mutakabbir BS, MPH(c), Samuel J. Casey MA
{"title":"评估社区教育计划对黑人社区疫苗素养和接受程度的影响","authors":"Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir PharmD, MPH,&nbsp;Raheem Abdul-Mutakabbir BS, MPH(c),&nbsp;Samuel J. Casey MA","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Immunization against influenza and herpes zoster significantly reduces mortality and disease-related morbidity. However, vaccination rates among the non-Hispanic Black populations in the United States remain suboptimal, despite evidence of increased infection rates and related complications. Factors such as systemic injustice and decades of medical mistreatment have contributed to reduced health literacy and access to healthcare. Community-based strategies that enhance vaccine knowledge and awareness have proven effective in increasing vaccine acceptance and uptake. This study explores the impact of a community-based educational intervention designed to improve influenza and herpes zoster vaccine literacy and acceptance among vulnerable Black individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The intervention comprised four interactive educational sessions, each lasting 45 minutes, that focused on preventable viruses, specifically influenza and herpes zoster. These sessions were held at a church in a vulnerable community in San Bernardino County, California. Participants aged 18 and older were invited to take part in a pre-and post-intervention study, which involved completing an anonymous survey to assess their attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors related to viruses and vaccines. To analyze the effect of the intervention on vaccine literacy, we applied the Mann-Whitney U test to compare responses to eight knowledge-based questions from the pre-and post-intervention surveys. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the impact of the intervention on vaccine acceptance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 138 participants completed the pre-intervention survey, while 116 (84%) completed the post-intervention survey. All participants identified as Black or African American, with 74% identifying as female and 65% aged 55 or older. Additionally, 99% of the participants lived in highly vulnerable areas, and 54% reported having at least one comorbid condition. Prior to the intervention, only 57% believed they were at risk for viral infections or related complications. However, following the intervention, 75% stated that it helped them reassess their risk. We observed significant improvements in vaccine literacy when comparing pre-and post-intervention survey responses, particularly concerning guideline-based recommendations for both vaccines (p&lt;0.05). Moreover, there was a notable increase in knowledge about the recommended co-administration of the herpes zoster and influenza vaccines (p&lt;0.05). Initially, 49% of participants expressed a high likelihood of receiving the influenza vaccine, while 65% indicated a high likelihood for the shingles vaccine. In contrast, after the intervention, 83% reported a high likelihood of getting vaccinated against influenza, and 85% indicated a high likelihood of receiving the herpes zoster vaccine. Furthermore, over 90% of post-intervention participants said they would recommend these vaccines to family members or friends after the educational sessions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Community-based educational interventions can have a positive impact on influenza and herpes zoster vaccine literacy and acceptance among vulnerable Black individuals. Further research is needed to explore additional methods to enhance vaccine literacy, acceptance, and uptake among minoritized groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Pages 3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing a Community Educational Program’s Effect on Vaccine Literacy and Acceptance in Black Communities\",\"authors\":\"Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir PharmD, MPH,&nbsp;Raheem Abdul-Mutakabbir BS, MPH(c),&nbsp;Samuel J. Casey MA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Immunization against influenza and herpes zoster significantly reduces mortality and disease-related morbidity. However, vaccination rates among the non-Hispanic Black populations in the United States remain suboptimal, despite evidence of increased infection rates and related complications. Factors such as systemic injustice and decades of medical mistreatment have contributed to reduced health literacy and access to healthcare. Community-based strategies that enhance vaccine knowledge and awareness have proven effective in increasing vaccine acceptance and uptake. This study explores the impact of a community-based educational intervention designed to improve influenza and herpes zoster vaccine literacy and acceptance among vulnerable Black individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The intervention comprised four interactive educational sessions, each lasting 45 minutes, that focused on preventable viruses, specifically influenza and herpes zoster. These sessions were held at a church in a vulnerable community in San Bernardino County, California. Participants aged 18 and older were invited to take part in a pre-and post-intervention study, which involved completing an anonymous survey to assess their attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors related to viruses and vaccines. To analyze the effect of the intervention on vaccine literacy, we applied the Mann-Whitney U test to compare responses to eight knowledge-based questions from the pre-and post-intervention surveys. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the impact of the intervention on vaccine acceptance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 138 participants completed the pre-intervention survey, while 116 (84%) completed the post-intervention survey. All participants identified as Black or African American, with 74% identifying as female and 65% aged 55 or older. Additionally, 99% of the participants lived in highly vulnerable areas, and 54% reported having at least one comorbid condition. Prior to the intervention, only 57% believed they were at risk for viral infections or related complications. However, following the intervention, 75% stated that it helped them reassess their risk. We observed significant improvements in vaccine literacy when comparing pre-and post-intervention survey responses, particularly concerning guideline-based recommendations for both vaccines (p&lt;0.05). Moreover, there was a notable increase in knowledge about the recommended co-administration of the herpes zoster and influenza vaccines (p&lt;0.05). Initially, 49% of participants expressed a high likelihood of receiving the influenza vaccine, while 65% indicated a high likelihood for the shingles vaccine. In contrast, after the intervention, 83% reported a high likelihood of getting vaccinated against influenza, and 85% indicated a high likelihood of receiving the herpes zoster vaccine. Furthermore, over 90% of post-intervention participants said they would recommend these vaccines to family members or friends after the educational sessions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Community-based educational interventions can have a positive impact on influenza and herpes zoster vaccine literacy and acceptance among vulnerable Black individuals. Further research is needed to explore additional methods to enhance vaccine literacy, acceptance, and uptake among minoritized groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 3-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流感和带状疱疹免疫接种可显著降低死亡率和疾病相关发病率。然而,尽管有证据表明感染率和相关并发症增加,但美国非西班牙裔黑人人群的疫苗接种率仍然不理想。系统性不公正和数十年的医疗虐待等因素导致卫生知识普及和获得医疗保健的机会减少。事实证明,加强疫苗知识和认识的社区战略在提高疫苗接受和吸收方面是有效的。本研究探讨了以社区为基础的教育干预的影响,旨在提高流感和带状疱疹疫苗的识字率和接受脆弱的黑人个体。方法干预包括四个互动教育环节,每次持续45分钟,重点是可预防的病毒,特别是流感和带状疱疹。这些会议在加利福尼亚州圣贝纳迪诺县一个脆弱社区的教堂举行。18岁及以上的参与者被邀请参加干预前和干预后的研究,其中包括完成一项匿名调查,以评估他们对病毒和疫苗的态度、知识和行为。为了分析干预对疫苗素养的影响,我们应用Mann-Whitney U检验来比较干预前后调查中8个基于知识的问题的回答。采用描述性统计评估干预措施对疫苗接受度的影响。结果共138人完成干预前调查,116人(84%)完成干预后调查。所有参与者都是黑人或非裔美国人,其中74%为女性,65%为55岁或以上。此外,99%的参与者生活在高度脆弱的地区,54%的人报告至少有一种合并症。在干预之前,只有57%的人认为他们有病毒感染或相关并发症的风险。然而,在干预之后,75%的人表示它帮助他们重新评估自己的风险。在比较干预前和干预后的调查结果时,我们观察到疫苗素养的显著提高,特别是关于两种疫苗的基于指南的建议(p<0.05)。此外,关于推荐带状疱疹和流感疫苗联合接种的知识也有显著增加(p < 0.05)。最初,49%的参与者表示很有可能接种流感疫苗,而65%的参与者表示很有可能接种带状疱疹疫苗。相比之下,在干预后,83%的人报告很有可能接种流感疫苗,85%的人表示很有可能接种带状疱疹疫苗。此外,超过90%的干预后参与者表示,他们会在教育课程后向家人或朋友推荐这些疫苗。结论社区教育干预对黑人易感人群流感和带状疱疹疫苗的认知度和接受度有积极影响。需要进一步研究以探索其他方法来提高少数群体对疫苗的认识、接受和吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing a Community Educational Program’s Effect on Vaccine Literacy and Acceptance in Black Communities

Introduction

Immunization against influenza and herpes zoster significantly reduces mortality and disease-related morbidity. However, vaccination rates among the non-Hispanic Black populations in the United States remain suboptimal, despite evidence of increased infection rates and related complications. Factors such as systemic injustice and decades of medical mistreatment have contributed to reduced health literacy and access to healthcare. Community-based strategies that enhance vaccine knowledge and awareness have proven effective in increasing vaccine acceptance and uptake. This study explores the impact of a community-based educational intervention designed to improve influenza and herpes zoster vaccine literacy and acceptance among vulnerable Black individuals.

Methods

The intervention comprised four interactive educational sessions, each lasting 45 minutes, that focused on preventable viruses, specifically influenza and herpes zoster. These sessions were held at a church in a vulnerable community in San Bernardino County, California. Participants aged 18 and older were invited to take part in a pre-and post-intervention study, which involved completing an anonymous survey to assess their attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors related to viruses and vaccines. To analyze the effect of the intervention on vaccine literacy, we applied the Mann-Whitney U test to compare responses to eight knowledge-based questions from the pre-and post-intervention surveys. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the impact of the intervention on vaccine acceptance.

Results

A total of 138 participants completed the pre-intervention survey, while 116 (84%) completed the post-intervention survey. All participants identified as Black or African American, with 74% identifying as female and 65% aged 55 or older. Additionally, 99% of the participants lived in highly vulnerable areas, and 54% reported having at least one comorbid condition. Prior to the intervention, only 57% believed they were at risk for viral infections or related complications. However, following the intervention, 75% stated that it helped them reassess their risk. We observed significant improvements in vaccine literacy when comparing pre-and post-intervention survey responses, particularly concerning guideline-based recommendations for both vaccines (p<0.05). Moreover, there was a notable increase in knowledge about the recommended co-administration of the herpes zoster and influenza vaccines (p<0.05). Initially, 49% of participants expressed a high likelihood of receiving the influenza vaccine, while 65% indicated a high likelihood for the shingles vaccine. In contrast, after the intervention, 83% reported a high likelihood of getting vaccinated against influenza, and 85% indicated a high likelihood of receiving the herpes zoster vaccine. Furthermore, over 90% of post-intervention participants said they would recommend these vaccines to family members or friends after the educational sessions.

Conclusion

Community-based educational interventions can have a positive impact on influenza and herpes zoster vaccine literacy and acceptance among vulnerable Black individuals. Further research is needed to explore additional methods to enhance vaccine literacy, acceptance, and uptake among minoritized groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信