评估最佳实践顾问在减少种族差异的低剂量阿司匹林推荐子痫前期

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Elisabeth N. Adkins MD, MBA, Etoi Garrison MD, PhD, Melissa S. Wong MD, MHDS, Mulubrhan F. Mogos PhD, MSc, FAHA
{"title":"评估最佳实践顾问在减少种族差异的低剂量阿司匹林推荐子痫前期","authors":"Elisabeth N. Adkins MD, MBA,&nbsp;Etoi Garrison MD, PhD,&nbsp;Melissa S. Wong MD, MHDS,&nbsp;Mulubrhan F. Mogos PhD, MSc, FAHA","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Preeclampsia significantly contributes to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends low-dose aspirin (LDA) for high-risk women to prevent preeclampsia. Despite this, significant racial/ethnic disparities exist in LDA utilization. Electronic Best Practice Alerts (eBPAs) may improve compliance with LDA recommendations. This study evaluates whether an eBPA implementation mitigated racial/ethnic disparities in LDA prescribing and preeclampsia incidence in an urban academic medical center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort of 15,216 pregnant women, categorized into four groups (White, Black, Other, and Missing), was analyzed before and after eBPA implementation. Preeclampsia incidence and LDA prescription rates were stratified by gestational age, race, and preeclampsia risk categories. Rao-Scott Chi-Square and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess changes in LDA prescribing and preeclampsia rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Post-eBPA, LDA prescription rates increased significantly across all risk categories, particularly among Black women (p &lt; .0001). White women showed a significant reduction in preeclampsia incidence post-eBPA (p &lt; .0001), while Black women had the highest preeclampsia risk and showed no significant reduction in risk post-eBPA (p = 0.1964). Racial disparities in LDA uptake and preeclampsia risk remained, with Black women experiencing persistently higher risk compared to other racial groups. The eBPA had a modest overall effect on reducing preeclampsia incidence (p = 0.0479).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While eBPA implementation increased LDA prescribing, it did not substantially mitigate racial/ethnic disparities in preeclampsia risk, particularly among Black women. Further strategies are needed to address these persistent disparities and ensure equitable health outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Pages 23-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Best-Practice-Advisors at Mitigating Ethnic disparities in Low-Dose-Aspirin Recommendation for Pre-Eclampsia\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth N. Adkins MD, MBA,&nbsp;Etoi Garrison MD, PhD,&nbsp;Melissa S. Wong MD, MHDS,&nbsp;Mulubrhan F. Mogos PhD, MSc, FAHA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Preeclampsia significantly contributes to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends low-dose aspirin (LDA) for high-risk women to prevent preeclampsia. Despite this, significant racial/ethnic disparities exist in LDA utilization. Electronic Best Practice Alerts (eBPAs) may improve compliance with LDA recommendations. This study evaluates whether an eBPA implementation mitigated racial/ethnic disparities in LDA prescribing and preeclampsia incidence in an urban academic medical center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort of 15,216 pregnant women, categorized into four groups (White, Black, Other, and Missing), was analyzed before and after eBPA implementation. Preeclampsia incidence and LDA prescription rates were stratified by gestational age, race, and preeclampsia risk categories. Rao-Scott Chi-Square and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess changes in LDA prescribing and preeclampsia rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Post-eBPA, LDA prescription rates increased significantly across all risk categories, particularly among Black women (p &lt; .0001). White women showed a significant reduction in preeclampsia incidence post-eBPA (p &lt; .0001), while Black women had the highest preeclampsia risk and showed no significant reduction in risk post-eBPA (p = 0.1964). Racial disparities in LDA uptake and preeclampsia risk remained, with Black women experiencing persistently higher risk compared to other racial groups. The eBPA had a modest overall effect on reducing preeclampsia incidence (p = 0.0479).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While eBPA implementation increased LDA prescribing, it did not substantially mitigate racial/ethnic disparities in preeclampsia risk, particularly among Black women. Further strategies are needed to address these persistent disparities and ensure equitable health outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 23-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002421\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先兆子痫对母体和胎儿的不良结局有显著影响。美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)建议高危女性使用低剂量阿司匹林(LDA)来预防先兆子痫。尽管如此,在LDA的利用方面存在着明显的种族/民族差异。电子最佳实践警报(ebpa)可以提高对LDA建议的遵从性。本研究评估在城市学术医疗中心实施eBPA是否减轻了LDA处方和子痫前期发病率的种族/民族差异。方法回顾性分析15216例孕妇,分为四组(白人、黑人、其他和未出生)实施eBPA前后的差异。子痫前期发病率和LDA处方率按胎龄、种族和子痫前期风险分类分层。采用Rao-Scott Chi-Square和logistic回归分析来评估LDA处方和子痫前期发生率的变化。结果ebpa后,LDA处方率在所有风险类别中均显著增加,尤其是黑人女性(p < .0001)。白人妇女在ebpa后子痫前期发生率显著降低(p < 0.0001),而黑人妇女子痫前期风险最高,但在ebpa后风险无显著降低(p = 0.1964)。LDA摄取和先兆子痫风险的种族差异仍然存在,与其他种族群体相比,黑人女性的风险持续较高。eBPA在降低子痫前期发生率方面总体效果一般(p = 0.0479)。结论:虽然eBPA的实施增加了LDA的处方,但它并没有实质性地减轻子痫前期风险的种族差异,特别是在黑人妇女中。需要进一步的战略来解决这些持续存在的差距并确保公平的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Best-Practice-Advisors at Mitigating Ethnic disparities in Low-Dose-Aspirin Recommendation for Pre-Eclampsia

Introduction

Preeclampsia significantly contributes to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends low-dose aspirin (LDA) for high-risk women to prevent preeclampsia. Despite this, significant racial/ethnic disparities exist in LDA utilization. Electronic Best Practice Alerts (eBPAs) may improve compliance with LDA recommendations. This study evaluates whether an eBPA implementation mitigated racial/ethnic disparities in LDA prescribing and preeclampsia incidence in an urban academic medical center.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 15,216 pregnant women, categorized into four groups (White, Black, Other, and Missing), was analyzed before and after eBPA implementation. Preeclampsia incidence and LDA prescription rates were stratified by gestational age, race, and preeclampsia risk categories. Rao-Scott Chi-Square and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess changes in LDA prescribing and preeclampsia rates.

Results

Post-eBPA, LDA prescription rates increased significantly across all risk categories, particularly among Black women (p < .0001). White women showed a significant reduction in preeclampsia incidence post-eBPA (p < .0001), while Black women had the highest preeclampsia risk and showed no significant reduction in risk post-eBPA (p = 0.1964). Racial disparities in LDA uptake and preeclampsia risk remained, with Black women experiencing persistently higher risk compared to other racial groups. The eBPA had a modest overall effect on reducing preeclampsia incidence (p = 0.0479).

Conclusion

While eBPA implementation increased LDA prescribing, it did not substantially mitigate racial/ethnic disparities in preeclampsia risk, particularly among Black women. Further strategies are needed to address these persistent disparities and ensure equitable health outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信