类风湿关节炎治疗中的种族差异

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jaide Cotton BA, Samrawit Zinabu MD, Miriam Michael MD
{"title":"类风湿关节炎治疗中的种族差异","authors":"Jaide Cotton BA,&nbsp;Samrawit Zinabu MD,&nbsp;Miriam Michael MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with joint destruction and systemic complications. Early treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is critical to prevent disability and comorbidities. Prior research identified significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in RA management, suggesting that African American patients experience delays in treatment initiation and underrepresentation in research. This study evaluated treatment utilization disparities between white and Black patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX Global Network, a database of 160 million patients. RA patients were identified using ICD-10-CM codes and classified into white and African American cohorts, matched 1:1 based on demographics, comorbidities, and social factors. Treatment utilization, including DMARDs, NSAIDs, corticosteroids, biologic therapies, and interleukin inhibitors, was analyzed using RxNorm codes. Group differences were assessed using Z-tests and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DMARD utilization was similar between white (33.35%) and African American (34.45%) patients. However, African American patients had higher NSAID (22.70% vs. 16.89%) and corticosteroid (5.56% vs. 4.29%) use, while white patients were more likely to receive biologic therapies (13.62% vs. 11.29%) and interleukin inhibitors (2.78% vs. 2.00%). White patients were also initiated on biologic and interleukin inhibitor therapies earlier.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlighted important differences in treatment utilization between white and African American patients. These differences in therapeutic approaches appear to contribute to poorer prognosis, accelerated disease progression, and diminished quality of life among African American patients. This emphasizes the need for targeted interventions to promote equitable care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Page 19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial Disparities in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis\",\"authors\":\"Jaide Cotton BA,&nbsp;Samrawit Zinabu MD,&nbsp;Miriam Michael MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with joint destruction and systemic complications. Early treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is critical to prevent disability and comorbidities. Prior research identified significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in RA management, suggesting that African American patients experience delays in treatment initiation and underrepresentation in research. This study evaluated treatment utilization disparities between white and Black patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX Global Network, a database of 160 million patients. RA patients were identified using ICD-10-CM codes and classified into white and African American cohorts, matched 1:1 based on demographics, comorbidities, and social factors. Treatment utilization, including DMARDs, NSAIDs, corticosteroids, biologic therapies, and interleukin inhibitors, was analyzed using RxNorm codes. Group differences were assessed using Z-tests and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DMARD utilization was similar between white (33.35%) and African American (34.45%) patients. However, African American patients had higher NSAID (22.70% vs. 16.89%) and corticosteroid (5.56% vs. 4.29%) use, while white patients were more likely to receive biologic therapies (13.62% vs. 11.29%) and interleukin inhibitors (2.78% vs. 2.00%). White patients were also initiated on biologic and interleukin inhibitor therapies earlier.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlighted important differences in treatment utilization between white and African American patients. These differences in therapeutic approaches appear to contribute to poorer prognosis, accelerated disease progression, and diminished quality of life among African American patients. This emphasizes the need for targeted interventions to promote equitable care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"Page 19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002354\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

类风湿性关节炎(RA)是一种与关节破坏和全身并发症相关的慢性炎症性疾病。早期使用改善疾病的抗风湿药物(DMARDs)治疗对于预防残疾和合并症至关重要。先前的研究发现,在类风湿性关节炎的治疗中存在显著的种族和社会经济差异,这表明非裔美国患者在治疗开始时出现延迟,在研究中的代表性不足。本研究评估了白人和黑人患者在治疗利用上的差异。方法利用TriNetX全球网络(一个包含1.6亿患者的数据库)进行回顾性队列研究。使用ICD-10-CM代码识别RA患者,并将其分为白人和非裔美国人队列,根据人口统计学,合并症和社会因素进行1:1匹配。使用RxNorm代码分析治疗利用情况,包括dmard、非甾体抗炎药、皮质类固醇、生物疗法和白细胞介素抑制剂。采用z检验和Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估组间差异。结果白人(33.35%)和非裔美国人(34.45%)的dmard使用率相似。然而,非裔美国患者使用较高的非甾体抗炎药(22.70% vs. 16.89%)和皮质类固醇(5.56% vs. 4.29%),而白人患者更可能接受生物治疗(13.62% vs. 11.29%)和白细胞介素抑制剂(2.78% vs. 2.00%)。白人患者也更早开始接受生物和白细胞介素抑制剂治疗。结论本研究突出了白人和非裔美国人在治疗利用上的重要差异。这些治疗方法的差异似乎导致非裔美国患者预后较差、疾病进展加快和生活质量下降。这强调需要有针对性的干预措施来促进公平护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial Disparities in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with joint destruction and systemic complications. Early treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is critical to prevent disability and comorbidities. Prior research identified significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in RA management, suggesting that African American patients experience delays in treatment initiation and underrepresentation in research. This study evaluated treatment utilization disparities between white and Black patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX Global Network, a database of 160 million patients. RA patients were identified using ICD-10-CM codes and classified into white and African American cohorts, matched 1:1 based on demographics, comorbidities, and social factors. Treatment utilization, including DMARDs, NSAIDs, corticosteroids, biologic therapies, and interleukin inhibitors, was analyzed using RxNorm codes. Group differences were assessed using Z-tests and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.

Results

DMARD utilization was similar between white (33.35%) and African American (34.45%) patients. However, African American patients had higher NSAID (22.70% vs. 16.89%) and corticosteroid (5.56% vs. 4.29%) use, while white patients were more likely to receive biologic therapies (13.62% vs. 11.29%) and interleukin inhibitors (2.78% vs. 2.00%). White patients were also initiated on biologic and interleukin inhibitor therapies earlier.

Conclusion

This study highlighted important differences in treatment utilization between white and African American patients. These differences in therapeutic approaches appear to contribute to poorer prognosis, accelerated disease progression, and diminished quality of life among African American patients. This emphasizes the need for targeted interventions to promote equitable care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信