GLP-1受体激动剂(如Ozempic)在减少糖尿病和肥胖治疗差异中的作用:疗效、可及性和公共卫生公平意义的系统综述

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Monika Panwar MPA
{"title":"GLP-1受体激动剂(如Ozempic)在减少糖尿病和肥胖治疗差异中的作用:疗效、可及性和公共卫生公平意义的系统综述","authors":"Monika Panwar MPA","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), such as semaglutide (Ozempic), have revolutionized the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity, with benefits beyond glycemic control, including weight loss and cardiovascular protection. Access to these drugs, despite their efficacy, is unequal, with marginalized populations facing considerable barriers in the way of cost, lack of insurance, and geographic disparities. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and equity implications of using GLP-1 RAs in treating diabetes and obesity and propose means by which access can be enhanced.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Systematic searching was carried out in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registers using the terms “GLP-1 receptor agonists,” “semaglutide,” “diabetes,” “obesity,” “health disparities,” and “access.” Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observation studies, and systematic reviews from the last seven years (2018-2024) were included. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta- analyses were performed to pool data on weight loss and glycemic control.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The result shows that of 1,235 records identified, 45 studies met the inclusion criteria. Semaglutide demonstrated better effect, such as average HbA1c reduction -1.5% (95% KI: -1.7 to -1.3) and 12.4% (95% CI: 11.8 to 13.0), with other GLP -1 RAS and traditional treatments better than conventional treatments. Reduction in cardiovascular risk was significant, with a 26% reduction in larger side effects in cardiovascular events (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.81). Safety profiles were favorable; gastrointestinal side effects were the most common but generally mild. However, access inequalities were evident: black and Latin American patients had 40% less probability of getting GLP -1 RAS and were 50% smaller manufacturers in rural areas. Innovative strategies such as telehealth models and policy intervention promised to improve access, with an increase of 30% in telecommunications tips.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>GLP-1 RAS, especially Semaglutide, is very effective and safe for handling diabetes and overweight. However, there are still many inequalities in access, which affect individuals in racial/ethnic minorities, poor and rural communities. The disruption of these barriers by telehealth, policy reform, and community-based services is paramount for health equity. The focus of this review is that equal access to GLP-1 RAs is a national public health priority. Insurance expansion, drug cost decreases, and expansion of telehealth and community-based services are paramount steps in closing gaps and improving outcomes in individuals with diabetes and obesity. A national public health priority must be equal access to GLP-1 RAs to improve outcomes and close gaps in individuals with diabetes and obesity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Page 6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (e.g., Ozempic) in Decreasing Disparities in Diabetes and Obesity Care: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Access, and Public Health Equity Implications\",\"authors\":\"Monika Panwar MPA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), such as semaglutide (Ozempic), have revolutionized the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity, with benefits beyond glycemic control, including weight loss and cardiovascular protection. Access to these drugs, despite their efficacy, is unequal, with marginalized populations facing considerable barriers in the way of cost, lack of insurance, and geographic disparities. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and equity implications of using GLP-1 RAs in treating diabetes and obesity and propose means by which access can be enhanced.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Systematic searching was carried out in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registers using the terms “GLP-1 receptor agonists,” “semaglutide,” “diabetes,” “obesity,” “health disparities,” and “access.” Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observation studies, and systematic reviews from the last seven years (2018-2024) were included. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta- analyses were performed to pool data on weight loss and glycemic control.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The result shows that of 1,235 records identified, 45 studies met the inclusion criteria. Semaglutide demonstrated better effect, such as average HbA1c reduction -1.5% (95% KI: -1.7 to -1.3) and 12.4% (95% CI: 11.8 to 13.0), with other GLP -1 RAS and traditional treatments better than conventional treatments. Reduction in cardiovascular risk was significant, with a 26% reduction in larger side effects in cardiovascular events (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.81). Safety profiles were favorable; gastrointestinal side effects were the most common but generally mild. However, access inequalities were evident: black and Latin American patients had 40% less probability of getting GLP -1 RAS and were 50% smaller manufacturers in rural areas. Innovative strategies such as telehealth models and policy intervention promised to improve access, with an increase of 30% in telecommunications tips.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>GLP-1 RAS, especially Semaglutide, is very effective and safe for handling diabetes and overweight. However, there are still many inequalities in access, which affect individuals in racial/ethnic minorities, poor and rural communities. The disruption of these barriers by telehealth, policy reform, and community-based services is paramount for health equity. The focus of this review is that equal access to GLP-1 RAs is a national public health priority. Insurance expansion, drug cost decreases, and expansion of telehealth and community-based services are paramount steps in closing gaps and improving outcomes in individuals with diabetes and obesity. A national public health priority must be equal access to GLP-1 RAs to improve outcomes and close gaps in individuals with diabetes and obesity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"Page 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

lucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs),如semaglutide (Ozempic),已经彻底改变了2型糖尿病和肥胖的治疗,其益处不仅仅是控制血糖,还包括减肥和心血管保护。尽管这些药物有效,但获得这些药物的机会是不平等的,边缘化人群在费用、缺乏保险和地域差异方面面临相当大的障碍。本系统综述旨在评估使用GLP-1 RAs治疗糖尿病和肥胖症的有效性、安全性和公平性,并提出可增强可及性的方法。方法使用“GLP-1受体激动剂”、“semaglutide”、“糖尿病”、“肥胖”、“健康差异”和“获取”等术语在Embase、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和临床试验注册库中进行系统检索。仅纳入了过去7年(2018-2024)的随机对照试验(rct)、观察研究和系统评价。数据提取遵循PRISMA指南,使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和Newcastle-Ottawa量表评估偏倚风险。我们进行了Meta分析,汇总了有关体重减轻和血糖控制的数据。结果1235篇文献中,45篇符合纳入标准。Semaglutide表现出更好的效果,如平均HbA1c降低-1.5% (95% KI: -1.7至-1.3)和12.4% (95% CI: 11.8至13.0),其他GLP -1 RAS和传统治疗优于常规治疗。心血管风险显著降低,心血管事件中较大副作用减少26% (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.68 ~ 0.81)。安全概况良好;胃肠道副作用是最常见的,但通常是轻微的。然而,获取途径的不平等是显而易见的:黑人和拉丁美洲患者获得GLP -1 RAS的可能性要低40%,而农村地区的小型制造商占50%。诸如远程医疗模式和政策干预等创新战略承诺改善可及性,电信小费增加了30%。结论lp -1 RAS治疗糖尿病和超重是一种安全有效的药物,尤其是西马鲁肽。然而,在获得医疗服务方面仍然存在许多不平等现象,影响到种族/族裔少数群体、贫困社区和农村社区的个人。通过远程保健、政策改革和以社区为基础的服务打破这些障碍对卫生公平至关重要。本综述的重点是平等获得GLP-1 RAs是国家公共卫生优先事项。扩大保险、降低药品成本以及扩大远程保健和社区服务是缩小差距和改善糖尿病和肥胖症患者预后的重要步骤。国家公共卫生的优先事项必须是平等获得GLP-1 RAs,以改善糖尿病和肥胖症患者的预后并缩小差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (e.g., Ozempic) in Decreasing Disparities in Diabetes and Obesity Care: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Access, and Public Health Equity Implications

Introduction

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), such as semaglutide (Ozempic), have revolutionized the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity, with benefits beyond glycemic control, including weight loss and cardiovascular protection. Access to these drugs, despite their efficacy, is unequal, with marginalized populations facing considerable barriers in the way of cost, lack of insurance, and geographic disparities. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and equity implications of using GLP-1 RAs in treating diabetes and obesity and propose means by which access can be enhanced.

Methods

Systematic searching was carried out in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registers using the terms “GLP-1 receptor agonists,” “semaglutide,” “diabetes,” “obesity,” “health disparities,” and “access.” Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observation studies, and systematic reviews from the last seven years (2018-2024) were included. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta- analyses were performed to pool data on weight loss and glycemic control.

Results

The result shows that of 1,235 records identified, 45 studies met the inclusion criteria. Semaglutide demonstrated better effect, such as average HbA1c reduction -1.5% (95% KI: -1.7 to -1.3) and 12.4% (95% CI: 11.8 to 13.0), with other GLP -1 RAS and traditional treatments better than conventional treatments. Reduction in cardiovascular risk was significant, with a 26% reduction in larger side effects in cardiovascular events (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.81). Safety profiles were favorable; gastrointestinal side effects were the most common but generally mild. However, access inequalities were evident: black and Latin American patients had 40% less probability of getting GLP -1 RAS and were 50% smaller manufacturers in rural areas. Innovative strategies such as telehealth models and policy intervention promised to improve access, with an increase of 30% in telecommunications tips.

Conclusion

GLP-1 RAS, especially Semaglutide, is very effective and safe for handling diabetes and overweight. However, there are still many inequalities in access, which affect individuals in racial/ethnic minorities, poor and rural communities. The disruption of these barriers by telehealth, policy reform, and community-based services is paramount for health equity. The focus of this review is that equal access to GLP-1 RAs is a national public health priority. Insurance expansion, drug cost decreases, and expansion of telehealth and community-based services are paramount steps in closing gaps and improving outcomes in individuals with diabetes and obesity. A national public health priority must be equal access to GLP-1 RAs to improve outcomes and close gaps in individuals with diabetes and obesity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信