密歇根州骨科疾病的比较流行病学研究

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Angel G.A. Prempeh BS, Olorunferanmi Oni BS, Allison Tenfelde MD
{"title":"密歇根州骨科疾病的比较流行病学研究","authors":"Angel G.A. Prempeh BS,&nbsp;Olorunferanmi Oni BS,&nbsp;Allison Tenfelde MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Variations in orthopedic care between urban and rural hospitals may influence length of stay (LOS), costs, and resource utilization. Yet the extent and nature of these differences remain poorly characterized. Understanding how hospital location, injury type, and insurance coverage influence length of stay and expenditures is essential. These factors play a crucial role in healthcare resource allocation and patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using 2018–2020 discharge records from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) database. Inclusion criteria was orthopedic-related diagnoses from Michigan hospitals. Hospitalizations were classified by location (urban vs rural), trauma status (trauma vs non-trauma), and insurance type (Medicare, Medicaid, private, other, uninsured). Length of stay, per-stay and aggregate hospital costs, and discharge rates were recorded. Multivariable t-tests, ANOVA, and a mixed-effects model analysis were conducted to compare differences across the variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 334,756 orthopedic discharges, urban hospitals had a longer mean LOS than rural hospitals (4.57 vs 4.09 days; P&lt;.001). Non-trauma cases incurred higher per-stay costs than trauma cases ($19,645 vs $16,630; P&lt;.001). Uninsured patients had the longest mean Length of Stay (LOS) (4.70 days), followed by Medicare (4.35 days), Medicaid (3.89 days), private insurance (3.72 days), and other insurance (3.06 days). All differences were statistically significant (P &lt; .001). Aggregate expenditures were highest for Medicare ($3.3M; P&lt;.001), and urban hospitals showed greater overall spending across all insurance groups. Medicaid had higher per- stay costs than uninsured ($18,745 vs $15,892; P=.03) but lower total expenditures. Rural hospitals reported higher per-stay trauma costs ($16,659 vs $16,509; P=.88) but lower total expenditures ($1.08M vs $7.44M; P&lt;.001), whereas urban non-trauma cases had the highest total expenditures ($9.68M; P&lt;.001). In a mixed-effects analysis, urban location, non-trauma status, and Medicare coverage were independently associated with increased LOS and hospital costs (P&lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Orthopedic care differences reflect variations in hospital infrastructure, case complexity, and reimbursement models. Urban hospitals often face higher costs, driven partly by Medicare-heavy admissions and resource-intensive non-trauma cases. Rural hospitals operate with tighter budgets, even though their per-stay trauma costs are similar to those in urban hospitals. Insurance- related cost fluctuations expose gaps in current reimbursement structures. Aligning payments with actual hospital burdens and investing in rural healthcare systems may help address these challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Pages 31-32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Epidemiological Study of Orthopedic Conditions in Michigan\",\"authors\":\"Angel G.A. Prempeh BS,&nbsp;Olorunferanmi Oni BS,&nbsp;Allison Tenfelde MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Variations in orthopedic care between urban and rural hospitals may influence length of stay (LOS), costs, and resource utilization. Yet the extent and nature of these differences remain poorly characterized. Understanding how hospital location, injury type, and insurance coverage influence length of stay and expenditures is essential. These factors play a crucial role in healthcare resource allocation and patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using 2018–2020 discharge records from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) database. Inclusion criteria was orthopedic-related diagnoses from Michigan hospitals. Hospitalizations were classified by location (urban vs rural), trauma status (trauma vs non-trauma), and insurance type (Medicare, Medicaid, private, other, uninsured). Length of stay, per-stay and aggregate hospital costs, and discharge rates were recorded. Multivariable t-tests, ANOVA, and a mixed-effects model analysis were conducted to compare differences across the variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 334,756 orthopedic discharges, urban hospitals had a longer mean LOS than rural hospitals (4.57 vs 4.09 days; P&lt;.001). Non-trauma cases incurred higher per-stay costs than trauma cases ($19,645 vs $16,630; P&lt;.001). Uninsured patients had the longest mean Length of Stay (LOS) (4.70 days), followed by Medicare (4.35 days), Medicaid (3.89 days), private insurance (3.72 days), and other insurance (3.06 days). All differences were statistically significant (P &lt; .001). Aggregate expenditures were highest for Medicare ($3.3M; P&lt;.001), and urban hospitals showed greater overall spending across all insurance groups. Medicaid had higher per- stay costs than uninsured ($18,745 vs $15,892; P=.03) but lower total expenditures. Rural hospitals reported higher per-stay trauma costs ($16,659 vs $16,509; P=.88) but lower total expenditures ($1.08M vs $7.44M; P&lt;.001), whereas urban non-trauma cases had the highest total expenditures ($9.68M; P&lt;.001). In a mixed-effects analysis, urban location, non-trauma status, and Medicare coverage were independently associated with increased LOS and hospital costs (P&lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Orthopedic care differences reflect variations in hospital infrastructure, case complexity, and reimbursement models. Urban hospitals often face higher costs, driven partly by Medicare-heavy admissions and resource-intensive non-trauma cases. Rural hospitals operate with tighter budgets, even though their per-stay trauma costs are similar to those in urban hospitals. Insurance- related cost fluctuations expose gaps in current reimbursement structures. Aligning payments with actual hospital burdens and investing in rural healthcare systems may help address these challenges.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 31-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002561\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城乡医院骨科护理的差异可能会影响住院时间(LOS)、费用和资源利用。然而,这些差异的程度和性质仍然不清楚。了解医院位置、受伤类型和保险范围如何影响住院时间和支出是至关重要的。这些因素在医疗资源分配和患者预后中起着至关重要的作用。方法利用美国卫生保健研究与质量局医疗成本与利用项目(HCUP)数据库2018-2020年的出院记录进行回顾性队列分析。纳入标准是来自密歇根医院的骨科相关诊断。住院情况按地点(城市与农村)、创伤状况(创伤与非创伤)和保险类型(医疗保险、医疗补助、私人、其他、无保险)进行分类。记录住院时间、每次住院和总住院费用以及出院率。采用多变量t检验、方差分析和混合效应模型分析来比较各变量之间的差异。结果在334,756例骨科出院患者中,城市医院的平均生存期较农村医院长(4.57天比4.09天;p < 0.01)。非创伤病例的每次住院费用高于创伤病例(19,645美元vs 16,630美元;P< 0.001)。未参保患者的平均住院时间最长(4.70天),其次是医疗保险(4.35天)、医疗补助(3.89天)、私人保险(3.72天)和其他保险(3.06天)。差异均有统计学意义(P < .001)。医疗保险的总支出最高(330万美元;P<.001),城市医院在所有保险组中显示出更高的总支出。医疗补助患者的每次住院费用高于无保险患者(18,745美元vs 15,892美元;P=.03),但总支出较低。农村医院报告的每次住院创伤费用较高(16,659美元对16,509美元;P=.88),但总支出较低(108万美元对744万美元;P=. 001),而城市非创伤病例的总支出最高(968万美元;P=. 001)。在混合效应分析中,城市位置、非创伤状态和医疗保险覆盖率与LOS和住院费用的增加独立相关(P<.001)。结论骨科护理差异反映了医院基础设施、病例复杂性和报销模式的差异。城市医院往往面临更高的成本,部分原因是医疗费用较高的住院病人和资源密集型的非创伤病例。尽管农村医院每次住院的创伤费用与城市医院相似,但它们的预算还是比较紧张。与保险相关的成本波动暴露了当前报销结构中的缺口。将支付与医院实际负担挂钩,并对农村医疗体系进行投资,可能有助于解决这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Epidemiological Study of Orthopedic Conditions in Michigan

Introduction

Variations in orthopedic care between urban and rural hospitals may influence length of stay (LOS), costs, and resource utilization. Yet the extent and nature of these differences remain poorly characterized. Understanding how hospital location, injury type, and insurance coverage influence length of stay and expenditures is essential. These factors play a crucial role in healthcare resource allocation and patient outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using 2018–2020 discharge records from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) database. Inclusion criteria was orthopedic-related diagnoses from Michigan hospitals. Hospitalizations were classified by location (urban vs rural), trauma status (trauma vs non-trauma), and insurance type (Medicare, Medicaid, private, other, uninsured). Length of stay, per-stay and aggregate hospital costs, and discharge rates were recorded. Multivariable t-tests, ANOVA, and a mixed-effects model analysis were conducted to compare differences across the variables.

Results

Among 334,756 orthopedic discharges, urban hospitals had a longer mean LOS than rural hospitals (4.57 vs 4.09 days; P<.001). Non-trauma cases incurred higher per-stay costs than trauma cases ($19,645 vs $16,630; P<.001). Uninsured patients had the longest mean Length of Stay (LOS) (4.70 days), followed by Medicare (4.35 days), Medicaid (3.89 days), private insurance (3.72 days), and other insurance (3.06 days). All differences were statistically significant (P < .001). Aggregate expenditures were highest for Medicare ($3.3M; P<.001), and urban hospitals showed greater overall spending across all insurance groups. Medicaid had higher per- stay costs than uninsured ($18,745 vs $15,892; P=.03) but lower total expenditures. Rural hospitals reported higher per-stay trauma costs ($16,659 vs $16,509; P=.88) but lower total expenditures ($1.08M vs $7.44M; P<.001), whereas urban non-trauma cases had the highest total expenditures ($9.68M; P<.001). In a mixed-effects analysis, urban location, non-trauma status, and Medicare coverage were independently associated with increased LOS and hospital costs (P<.001).

Conclusion

Orthopedic care differences reflect variations in hospital infrastructure, case complexity, and reimbursement models. Urban hospitals often face higher costs, driven partly by Medicare-heavy admissions and resource-intensive non-trauma cases. Rural hospitals operate with tighter budgets, even though their per-stay trauma costs are similar to those in urban hospitals. Insurance- related cost fluctuations expose gaps in current reimbursement structures. Aligning payments with actual hospital burdens and investing in rural healthcare systems may help address these challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信