Quinton D. Johnson BS, Emmanuel Y. Kerolle BS, Amara A. Chike BS, Jeff G. Palmer BS, Somtochi A. Edeh BS, Samrawit W. Zinabu MD, Miriam B. Michael MD
{"title":"吉兰-巴罗综合征结局的种族差异:一年分析","authors":"Quinton D. Johnson BS, Emmanuel Y. Kerolle BS, Amara A. Chike BS, Jeff G. Palmer BS, Somtochi A. Edeh BS, Samrawit W. Zinabu MD, Miriam B. Michael MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an acute autoimmune neuropathy that can lead to paralysis, muscle weakness, sensory deficits, and mortality. Racial disparities in healthcare access and disease outcomes are well-documented, but their impact on GBS outcomes remains unclear. This study examines one-year outcomes (paralysis, numbness, muscle weakness, and mortality) in Black/African American and White/Caucasian patients matched for comorbidities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using propensity-matched Black/African American and White/Caucasian patients diagnosed with GBS. Matching criteria included comorbid conditions such as diabetes, obesity, pregnancy-related conditions, respiratory diseases, and circulatory diseases. Risk analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and t-tests were performed to assess differences in outcomes between racial groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No statistically significant differences were found between Black and White patients for paralysis (p = 0.163), numbness (p = 0.849), muscle weakness (p = 0.333), or mortality (p = 0.694). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also showed no significant difference in time-to- event for any outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study suggests that, after adjusting for key comorbidities, racial background does not significantly influence one-year outcomes in GBS. These findings highlight the importance of equitable medical care and early intervention. Future research should explore healthcare access, treatment differences, and long-term functional recovery to further understand potential disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 1","pages":"Page 36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial Differences in Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outcomes: One-Year Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Quinton D. Johnson BS, Emmanuel Y. Kerolle BS, Amara A. Chike BS, Jeff G. Palmer BS, Somtochi A. Edeh BS, Samrawit W. Zinabu MD, Miriam B. Michael MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.08.068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an acute autoimmune neuropathy that can lead to paralysis, muscle weakness, sensory deficits, and mortality. Racial disparities in healthcare access and disease outcomes are well-documented, but their impact on GBS outcomes remains unclear. This study examines one-year outcomes (paralysis, numbness, muscle weakness, and mortality) in Black/African American and White/Caucasian patients matched for comorbidities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using propensity-matched Black/African American and White/Caucasian patients diagnosed with GBS. Matching criteria included comorbid conditions such as diabetes, obesity, pregnancy-related conditions, respiratory diseases, and circulatory diseases. Risk analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and t-tests were performed to assess differences in outcomes between racial groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No statistically significant differences were found between Black and White patients for paralysis (p = 0.163), numbness (p = 0.849), muscle weakness (p = 0.333), or mortality (p = 0.694). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also showed no significant difference in time-to- event for any outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study suggests that, after adjusting for key comorbidities, racial background does not significantly influence one-year outcomes in GBS. These findings highlight the importance of equitable medical care and early intervention. Future research should explore healthcare access, treatment differences, and long-term functional recovery to further understand potential disparities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"Page 36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002640\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968425002640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Racial Differences in Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outcomes: One-Year Analysis
Introduction
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an acute autoimmune neuropathy that can lead to paralysis, muscle weakness, sensory deficits, and mortality. Racial disparities in healthcare access and disease outcomes are well-documented, but their impact on GBS outcomes remains unclear. This study examines one-year outcomes (paralysis, numbness, muscle weakness, and mortality) in Black/African American and White/Caucasian patients matched for comorbidities.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using propensity-matched Black/African American and White/Caucasian patients diagnosed with GBS. Matching criteria included comorbid conditions such as diabetes, obesity, pregnancy-related conditions, respiratory diseases, and circulatory diseases. Risk analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and t-tests were performed to assess differences in outcomes between racial groups.
Results
No statistically significant differences were found between Black and White patients for paralysis (p = 0.163), numbness (p = 0.849), muscle weakness (p = 0.333), or mortality (p = 0.694). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also showed no significant difference in time-to- event for any outcome.
Conclusion
This study suggests that, after adjusting for key comorbidities, racial background does not significantly influence one-year outcomes in GBS. These findings highlight the importance of equitable medical care and early intervention. Future research should explore healthcare access, treatment differences, and long-term functional recovery to further understand potential disparities.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent.
The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.