Yansong Bai , Peiyuan Chen , Qun Ma , Xiao Sun , Luis Inostroza , Qingxu Huang , Yuchen Zhou , Yihan Zhou , Ling Zhang
{"title":"感知和计算的生态系统服务对居民的人类福祉有不同的影响吗?——以官厅水库盆地为例","authors":"Yansong Bai , Peiyuan Chen , Qun Ma , Xiao Sun , Luis Inostroza , Qingxu Huang , Yuchen Zhou , Yihan Zhou , Ling Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the relationship between ecosystem services (ES) and human well-being is critical for sustainable development. However, ES are often quantified in either resident-perceived or model-measured perspective, whether this would cause a difference in its relationship with human well-being is poorly understood. By integrating biophysical models and household surveys, we used the method of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to compare how perceived (resident-based) and calculated (model-based) ES influence human well-being in China’s Guanting Reservoir basin. Results revealed that provisioning services consistently enhanced human well-being in both perspectives, with influence coefficients ranging from 0.134 to 0.222. Discrepancies emerged in pathways among regulating, supporting, and cultural services, as residents’ perceptions contradicted the results derived from calculated ES. These differences highlight the gap between public perception shaped by socio-cultural narratives and biophysical realities, and emphasize the need for multi-perspective approaches in the valuation of ES to align with residents’ well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 103765"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do perceived and calculated ecosystem services affect residents’ human well-being differently? ——A comparison study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China\",\"authors\":\"Yansong Bai , Peiyuan Chen , Qun Ma , Xiao Sun , Luis Inostroza , Qingxu Huang , Yuchen Zhou , Yihan Zhou , Ling Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding the relationship between ecosystem services (ES) and human well-being is critical for sustainable development. However, ES are often quantified in either resident-perceived or model-measured perspective, whether this would cause a difference in its relationship with human well-being is poorly understood. By integrating biophysical models and household surveys, we used the method of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to compare how perceived (resident-based) and calculated (model-based) ES influence human well-being in China’s Guanting Reservoir basin. Results revealed that provisioning services consistently enhanced human well-being in both perspectives, with influence coefficients ranging from 0.134 to 0.222. Discrepancies emerged in pathways among regulating, supporting, and cultural services, as residents’ perceptions contradicted the results derived from calculated ES. These differences highlight the gap between public perception shaped by socio-cultural narratives and biophysical realities, and emphasize the need for multi-perspective approaches in the valuation of ES to align with residents’ well-being.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Geography\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103765\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825002607\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825002607","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do perceived and calculated ecosystem services affect residents’ human well-being differently? ——A comparison study in the Guanting Reservoir basin, China
Understanding the relationship between ecosystem services (ES) and human well-being is critical for sustainable development. However, ES are often quantified in either resident-perceived or model-measured perspective, whether this would cause a difference in its relationship with human well-being is poorly understood. By integrating biophysical models and household surveys, we used the method of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to compare how perceived (resident-based) and calculated (model-based) ES influence human well-being in China’s Guanting Reservoir basin. Results revealed that provisioning services consistently enhanced human well-being in both perspectives, with influence coefficients ranging from 0.134 to 0.222. Discrepancies emerged in pathways among regulating, supporting, and cultural services, as residents’ perceptions contradicted the results derived from calculated ES. These differences highlight the gap between public perception shaped by socio-cultural narratives and biophysical realities, and emphasize the need for multi-perspective approaches in the valuation of ES to align with residents’ well-being.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.