估计2009年至2020年英国酒精相关肝病负担的不平等:一项使用常规收集数据的基于人群的研究

Zhaonan Wang, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar, Arlene Copland, Darren Quelch, Rasiah Thayakaran, Joht Singh Chandan, James Ferguson, Matthew Brookes, Matthew Lewis, Neil Rajoriya, Nigel Trudgill, Ramesh Arasaradnam, Sally Bradberry, Shamil Haroon, Neeraj Bhala, Nicola J Adderley
{"title":"估计2009年至2020年英国酒精相关肝病负担的不平等:一项使用常规收集数据的基于人群的研究","authors":"Zhaonan Wang, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar, Arlene Copland, Darren Quelch, Rasiah Thayakaran, Joht Singh Chandan, James Ferguson, Matthew Brookes, Matthew Lewis, Neil Rajoriya, Nigel Trudgill, Ramesh Arasaradnam, Sally Bradberry, Shamil Haroon, Neeraj Bhala, Nicola J Adderley","doi":"10.1016/j.lanprc.2025.100002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need to understand the preventable burden of alcohol-related liver disease (ARLD) and to improve the identification of individuals at high risk. We aimed to establish reliable and stratified epidemiological data to understand the burden of ARLD and the inequalities in this burden related to ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, and region in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, a primary care database that includes 20% of UK general practices. The study period was Jan 1, 2009, to Dec 31, 2020; all patients aged 18 years and older registered at a participating practice were eligible for inclusion. Hospital admission data were extracted from linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and ARLD-specific mortality data were obtained from Office for National Statistics Death Registration Data. Several analytical approaches were used, as follows: yearly cross-sectional and cohort analyses to calculate the annual prevalence and incidence of ARLD, respectively; a retrospective, matched, open cohort study to assess all-cause mortality rates (in which patients without liver disease were matched with patients with ARLD on the basis of age, sex, ethnicity, and geographical region); and a retrospective, open cohort analysis to evaluate all-cause hospitalisation rates. Hospitalisation rates were calculated in those with ARLD only. We explored different definitions of ARLD, and our primary definition was definite ARLD (ie, a coded clinical record specifying ARLD). Incidence and prevalence were stratified by age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation [IMD] quintile) and geographical region.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>During the study period, 19 534 887 patients from 1491 practices were eligible for inclusion in our study. For definite ARLD exposure, 257 544 patients were included in the all-cause mortality outcome analysis, of whom 51 510 were diagnosed with definite ARLD; while among the 50 409 patients with definite ARLD for whom HES-linked data were available, 37 142 had one or more hospital admissions. Prevalence of definite ARLD rose from 154 to 243 per 100 000 population from 2009 to 2020. Incidence increased from 18·6 to 30·3 per 100 000 person-years between 2009 and 2019, and then decreased to 24·7 per 100 000 person-years in 2020. Prevalence and incidence of ARLD by age, sex, ethnicity, geographical region, and IMD quintile increased between 2009 and 2020. The overall adjusted all-cause mortality hazard ratio (HR) for those with definite ARLD compared with no liver disease was 4·30 (95% CI 4·20-4·41). The effect of ARLD on mortality was more pronounced in younger than older age groups (eg, adjusted HR of 21·86 [95% CI 18·23-26·20]) in those aged 30-39 years <i>vs</i> 2·19 [2·09-2·29] in those ≥70 years) and in females than in males (5·61 [5·35-5·88] <i>vs</i> 3·93 [3·83-4·04]). The overall incidence rate for hospitalisations in patients with definite ARLD was 1·17 per person-year. Hospitalisation rates were higher in females (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·03 [95% CI 1·01-1·06]) and in patients in more deprived groups (1·16 [1·10-1·21] in the most deprived IMD quintile <i>vs</i> the least deprived quintile).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings indicate an increasing burden of ARLD in the UK. Raising awareness of disparities in health outcomes in affected groups could facilitate earlier and more targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research Clinical Research Network West Midlands.</p>","PeriodicalId":521027,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet. Primary care","volume":"1 1","pages":"None"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating inequality in alcohol-related liver disease burden in the UK, 2009 to 2020: a population-based study using routinely collected data.\",\"authors\":\"Zhaonan Wang, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar, Arlene Copland, Darren Quelch, Rasiah Thayakaran, Joht Singh Chandan, James Ferguson, Matthew Brookes, Matthew Lewis, Neil Rajoriya, Nigel Trudgill, Ramesh Arasaradnam, Sally Bradberry, Shamil Haroon, Neeraj Bhala, Nicola J Adderley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lanprc.2025.100002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need to understand the preventable burden of alcohol-related liver disease (ARLD) and to improve the identification of individuals at high risk. We aimed to establish reliable and stratified epidemiological data to understand the burden of ARLD and the inequalities in this burden related to ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, and region in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, a primary care database that includes 20% of UK general practices. The study period was Jan 1, 2009, to Dec 31, 2020; all patients aged 18 years and older registered at a participating practice were eligible for inclusion. Hospital admission data were extracted from linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and ARLD-specific mortality data were obtained from Office for National Statistics Death Registration Data. Several analytical approaches were used, as follows: yearly cross-sectional and cohort analyses to calculate the annual prevalence and incidence of ARLD, respectively; a retrospective, matched, open cohort study to assess all-cause mortality rates (in which patients without liver disease were matched with patients with ARLD on the basis of age, sex, ethnicity, and geographical region); and a retrospective, open cohort analysis to evaluate all-cause hospitalisation rates. Hospitalisation rates were calculated in those with ARLD only. We explored different definitions of ARLD, and our primary definition was definite ARLD (ie, a coded clinical record specifying ARLD). Incidence and prevalence were stratified by age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation [IMD] quintile) and geographical region.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>During the study period, 19 534 887 patients from 1491 practices were eligible for inclusion in our study. For definite ARLD exposure, 257 544 patients were included in the all-cause mortality outcome analysis, of whom 51 510 were diagnosed with definite ARLD; while among the 50 409 patients with definite ARLD for whom HES-linked data were available, 37 142 had one or more hospital admissions. Prevalence of definite ARLD rose from 154 to 243 per 100 000 population from 2009 to 2020. Incidence increased from 18·6 to 30·3 per 100 000 person-years between 2009 and 2019, and then decreased to 24·7 per 100 000 person-years in 2020. Prevalence and incidence of ARLD by age, sex, ethnicity, geographical region, and IMD quintile increased between 2009 and 2020. The overall adjusted all-cause mortality hazard ratio (HR) for those with definite ARLD compared with no liver disease was 4·30 (95% CI 4·20-4·41). The effect of ARLD on mortality was more pronounced in younger than older age groups (eg, adjusted HR of 21·86 [95% CI 18·23-26·20]) in those aged 30-39 years <i>vs</i> 2·19 [2·09-2·29] in those ≥70 years) and in females than in males (5·61 [5·35-5·88] <i>vs</i> 3·93 [3·83-4·04]). The overall incidence rate for hospitalisations in patients with definite ARLD was 1·17 per person-year. Hospitalisation rates were higher in females (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·03 [95% CI 1·01-1·06]) and in patients in more deprived groups (1·16 [1·10-1·21] in the most deprived IMD quintile <i>vs</i> the least deprived quintile).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings indicate an increasing burden of ARLD in the UK. Raising awareness of disparities in health outcomes in affected groups could facilitate earlier and more targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research Clinical Research Network West Midlands.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":521027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet. Primary care\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"None\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379629/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet. Primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanprc.2025.100002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet. Primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanprc.2025.100002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有必要了解酒精相关性肝病(ARLD)的可预防负担,并提高对高危人群的识别。我们旨在建立可靠和分层的流行病学数据,以了解英国ARLD的负担以及与种族、社会经济因素和地区相关的这种负担的不平等。方法:数据从临床实践研究数据链Aurum中提取,这是一个初级保健数据库,包括英国20%的全科实践。研究期为2009年1月1日至2020年12月31日;所有在参与实践中注册的18岁及以上的患者均符合纳入条件。入院数据来自相关的医院事件统计(HES), arld特异性死亡率数据来自国家统计局死亡登记数据。采用了以下几种分析方法:年度横断面分析和队列分析,分别计算ARLD的年度患病率和发病率;一项回顾性、匹配、开放队列研究,以评估全因死亡率(其中无肝病患者与ARLD患者根据年龄、性别、种族和地理区域进行匹配);并进行回顾性、开放式队列分析,以评估全因住院率。仅计算ARLD患者的住院率。我们探讨了ARLD的不同定义,我们的主要定义是明确的ARLD(即指定ARLD的编码临床记录)。发病率和患病率按年龄、性别、种族、剥夺(多重剥夺指数[IMD]五分位数)和地理区域分层。结果:在研究期间,来自1491个实践的19534887例患者符合纳入我们的研究。对于明确的ARLD暴露,257 544例患者被纳入全因死亡率结果分析,其中51 510例被诊断为明确的ARLD;而在50409例有hes相关数据的明确ARLD患者中,37142例有一次或多次住院。从2009年到2020年,明确的ARLD患病率从每10万人154人上升到243人。2009年至2019年,发病率从18.6 / 10万人-年增加到30.3 / 10万人-年,然后在2020年下降到24.7 / 10万人-年。按年龄、性别、种族、地理区域和IMD五分位数划分的ARLD患病率和发病率在2009年至2020年间有所增加。明确的ARLD患者与无肝病患者相比,调整后的全因死亡率风险比(HR)为4.30 (95% CI 4.20 - 4.41)。ARLD对死亡率的影响在年龄较小的年龄组中比在年龄较大的年龄组中更为明显(例如,30-39岁的校正HR为21.86 [95% CI为18.23 - 26.20]),而≥70岁的校正HR为2.19[2.09 - 2.29]),女性比男性(5.61[5.35 - 5.88]比3.93[3.83 - 3.04])。确诊ARLD患者的住院总发病率为1.17 /人/年。女性的住院率更高(调整后的发病率比为1.03 [95% CI为1.01 - 1.06]),而在更贫困的组中(最贫困的IMD五分之一组与最贫困的五分之一组的住院率为1.16[1.10 - 1.21])。解释:我们的研究结果表明,ARLD在英国的负担越来越重。提高对受影响群体健康结果差异的认识,可促进更早和更有针对性的干预。资助:国家卫生和护理研究所临床研究网络西米德兰兹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating inequality in alcohol-related liver disease burden in the UK, 2009 to 2020: a population-based study using routinely collected data.

Background: There is a need to understand the preventable burden of alcohol-related liver disease (ARLD) and to improve the identification of individuals at high risk. We aimed to establish reliable and stratified epidemiological data to understand the burden of ARLD and the inequalities in this burden related to ethnicity, socioeconomic factors, and region in the UK.

Methods: Data were extracted from Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, a primary care database that includes 20% of UK general practices. The study period was Jan 1, 2009, to Dec 31, 2020; all patients aged 18 years and older registered at a participating practice were eligible for inclusion. Hospital admission data were extracted from linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and ARLD-specific mortality data were obtained from Office for National Statistics Death Registration Data. Several analytical approaches were used, as follows: yearly cross-sectional and cohort analyses to calculate the annual prevalence and incidence of ARLD, respectively; a retrospective, matched, open cohort study to assess all-cause mortality rates (in which patients without liver disease were matched with patients with ARLD on the basis of age, sex, ethnicity, and geographical region); and a retrospective, open cohort analysis to evaluate all-cause hospitalisation rates. Hospitalisation rates were calculated in those with ARLD only. We explored different definitions of ARLD, and our primary definition was definite ARLD (ie, a coded clinical record specifying ARLD). Incidence and prevalence were stratified by age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation [IMD] quintile) and geographical region.

Findings: During the study period, 19 534 887 patients from 1491 practices were eligible for inclusion in our study. For definite ARLD exposure, 257 544 patients were included in the all-cause mortality outcome analysis, of whom 51 510 were diagnosed with definite ARLD; while among the 50 409 patients with definite ARLD for whom HES-linked data were available, 37 142 had one or more hospital admissions. Prevalence of definite ARLD rose from 154 to 243 per 100 000 population from 2009 to 2020. Incidence increased from 18·6 to 30·3 per 100 000 person-years between 2009 and 2019, and then decreased to 24·7 per 100 000 person-years in 2020. Prevalence and incidence of ARLD by age, sex, ethnicity, geographical region, and IMD quintile increased between 2009 and 2020. The overall adjusted all-cause mortality hazard ratio (HR) for those with definite ARLD compared with no liver disease was 4·30 (95% CI 4·20-4·41). The effect of ARLD on mortality was more pronounced in younger than older age groups (eg, adjusted HR of 21·86 [95% CI 18·23-26·20]) in those aged 30-39 years vs 2·19 [2·09-2·29] in those ≥70 years) and in females than in males (5·61 [5·35-5·88] vs 3·93 [3·83-4·04]). The overall incidence rate for hospitalisations in patients with definite ARLD was 1·17 per person-year. Hospitalisation rates were higher in females (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1·03 [95% CI 1·01-1·06]) and in patients in more deprived groups (1·16 [1·10-1·21] in the most deprived IMD quintile vs the least deprived quintile).

Interpretation: Our findings indicate an increasing burden of ARLD in the UK. Raising awareness of disparities in health outcomes in affected groups could facilitate earlier and more targeted interventions.

Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research Clinical Research Network West Midlands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信