最小化房颤消融后房食管瘘的风险:危险因素、预防和新兴的微热技术。

IF 1.3
Muhammed Ibrahim Erbay, Esedullah Yağlı, Tasha Phillips-Wilson, Arda Çeviker, Henry D Huang, Joseph E Marine, Kıvanç Yalın
{"title":"最小化房颤消融后房食管瘘的风险:危险因素、预防和新兴的微热技术。","authors":"Muhammed Ibrahim Erbay, Esedullah Yağlı, Tasha Phillips-Wilson, Arda Çeviker, Henry D Huang, Joseph E Marine, Kıvanç Yalın","doi":"10.1111/pace.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but life-threatening complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, linked to thermal injuries by conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cryo-balloon (CB) ablation techniques. AEF risk can be mitigated by considering several measures such as tailored power settings of ablation technique, mechanical displacement of esophagus, esophageal cooling, and alternative ablative techniques and energy sources. We review the current knowledge regarding AEF and esophageal thermal injuries as well as discussing the current research regarding a novel none-to-minimally thermal, myocardial tissue-selective modality known as pulsed-field ablation (PFA) which may mitigate such risks. By inducing irreversible electroporation, PFA reduces thermal injury and demonstrates improved safety profiles, as evidenced by recent meta-analyses reporting zero esophageal injury and AEF cases. Additionally, the integration of 3D mapping systems with PFA has enhanced its procedural precision and accuracy while lowering the radiation exposure. Despite these advances, challenges such as standardizing anesthesia protocols and tailoring energy settings remain. Our review suggests that PFA may reduce the risk of AEF from catheter ablation of AF. While early outcomes of PFA are encouraging, it is important to recognize that preliminary data may not always be predictive of long-term AEF formation risk, as demonstrated by earlier experiences with CB ablation. Although PFA may reduce the risk of any aberrant thermal injuries, recent studies report significant increase in collateral damage including hemolysis, exaggerated troponin leak and coronary vasospasms. PFA should be used with caution in patients with hemolytic anemia or renal dysfunction, as they may experience more pronounced effects. Future long-term outcome studies should provide more information on possible adverse outcomes with PFA as well as tailoring the power settings of PFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimizing Atrioesophageal Fistula Risk After AF Ablation: Risk Factors, Prevention, and Emerging Mini-Thermal Technology.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Ibrahim Erbay, Esedullah Yağlı, Tasha Phillips-Wilson, Arda Çeviker, Henry D Huang, Joseph E Marine, Kıvanç Yalın\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Atrial esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but life-threatening complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, linked to thermal injuries by conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cryo-balloon (CB) ablation techniques. AEF risk can be mitigated by considering several measures such as tailored power settings of ablation technique, mechanical displacement of esophagus, esophageal cooling, and alternative ablative techniques and energy sources. We review the current knowledge regarding AEF and esophageal thermal injuries as well as discussing the current research regarding a novel none-to-minimally thermal, myocardial tissue-selective modality known as pulsed-field ablation (PFA) which may mitigate such risks. By inducing irreversible electroporation, PFA reduces thermal injury and demonstrates improved safety profiles, as evidenced by recent meta-analyses reporting zero esophageal injury and AEF cases. Additionally, the integration of 3D mapping systems with PFA has enhanced its procedural precision and accuracy while lowering the radiation exposure. Despite these advances, challenges such as standardizing anesthesia protocols and tailoring energy settings remain. Our review suggests that PFA may reduce the risk of AEF from catheter ablation of AF. While early outcomes of PFA are encouraging, it is important to recognize that preliminary data may not always be predictive of long-term AEF formation risk, as demonstrated by earlier experiences with CB ablation. Although PFA may reduce the risk of any aberrant thermal injuries, recent studies report significant increase in collateral damage including hemolysis, exaggerated troponin leak and coronary vasospasms. PFA should be used with caution in patients with hemolytic anemia or renal dysfunction, as they may experience more pronounced effects. Future long-term outcome studies should provide more information on possible adverse outcomes with PFA as well as tailoring the power settings of PFA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心房食管瘘(AEF)是心房颤动(AF)消融的一种罕见但危及生命的并发症,与传统射频(RF)和低温球囊(CB)消融技术的热损伤有关。AEF的风险可以通过考虑以下几种措施来减轻,如消融技术的量身定制的功率设置、食管的机械位移、食管冷却以及替代的消融技术和能源。我们回顾了目前关于AEF和食管热损伤的知识,并讨论了目前关于一种新的无至最低热心肌组织选择性模式的研究,这种模式被称为脉冲场消融(PFA),可以减轻这种风险。通过诱导不可逆电穿孔,PFA减少了热损伤,并显示出更高的安全性,最近的meta分析报告证明了零食管损伤和AEF病例。此外,3D测绘系统与PFA的集成提高了其程序的精度和准确性,同时降低了辐射暴露。尽管取得了这些进步,但标准化麻醉方案和调整能量设置等挑战仍然存在。我们的综述表明,PFA可以降低房颤导管消融引起的AEF的风险。虽然PFA的早期结果令人鼓舞,但重要的是要认识到,早期的CB消融经验表明,初步数据可能并不总是预测长期AEF形成的风险。尽管PFA可以降低任何异常热损伤的风险,但最近的研究报告显着增加了附带损伤,包括溶血,肌钙蛋白过度泄漏和冠状动脉痉挛。对于溶血性贫血或肾功能不全的患者应谨慎使用PFA,因为他们可能会经历更明显的影响。未来的长期结果研究应该提供更多关于PFA可能的不良结果的信息,以及调整PFA的功率设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimizing Atrioesophageal Fistula Risk After AF Ablation: Risk Factors, Prevention, and Emerging Mini-Thermal Technology.

Atrial esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but life-threatening complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, linked to thermal injuries by conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cryo-balloon (CB) ablation techniques. AEF risk can be mitigated by considering several measures such as tailored power settings of ablation technique, mechanical displacement of esophagus, esophageal cooling, and alternative ablative techniques and energy sources. We review the current knowledge regarding AEF and esophageal thermal injuries as well as discussing the current research regarding a novel none-to-minimally thermal, myocardial tissue-selective modality known as pulsed-field ablation (PFA) which may mitigate such risks. By inducing irreversible electroporation, PFA reduces thermal injury and demonstrates improved safety profiles, as evidenced by recent meta-analyses reporting zero esophageal injury and AEF cases. Additionally, the integration of 3D mapping systems with PFA has enhanced its procedural precision and accuracy while lowering the radiation exposure. Despite these advances, challenges such as standardizing anesthesia protocols and tailoring energy settings remain. Our review suggests that PFA may reduce the risk of AEF from catheter ablation of AF. While early outcomes of PFA are encouraging, it is important to recognize that preliminary data may not always be predictive of long-term AEF formation risk, as demonstrated by earlier experiences with CB ablation. Although PFA may reduce the risk of any aberrant thermal injuries, recent studies report significant increase in collateral damage including hemolysis, exaggerated troponin leak and coronary vasospasms. PFA should be used with caution in patients with hemolytic anemia or renal dysfunction, as they may experience more pronounced effects. Future long-term outcome studies should provide more information on possible adverse outcomes with PFA as well as tailoring the power settings of PFA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信