风湿病患者医生治疗选择的动机结构:一项横断面研究的生物伦理学分析

IF 1.8
Irazú Contreras-Yáñez, Guillermo Guaracha-Basáñez, Diana Marcela Padilla-Ortiz, Virginia Pascual-Ramos
{"title":"风湿病患者医生治疗选择的动机结构:一项横断面研究的生物伦理学分析","authors":"Irazú Contreras-Yáñez, Guillermo Guaracha-Basáñez, Diana Marcela Padilla-Ortiz, Virginia Pascual-Ramos","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>The framework for the study centered on the treatment decisions made by physicians during their medical encounters with patients with rheumatic diseases. Our primary objective was to analyze, from a bioethical perspective, the underlying latent factors that influence these treatment decisions, focusing on the physician motivations behind them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was carried out at an outpatient clinic where 14 certified rheumatologists and 10 trainees worked (February 2023-February 2024). Standardized data from 703 patient-physician encounters regarding the physician's treatment choice, their motivations, and patients' disease activity level were obtained. Exploratory factorial analysis defined how motivations integrate latent factors and structure treatment choices in various health care scenarios, defined by the physician choice and degree and the patient level of disease activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were primarily middle-aged women with long-standing rheumatic diseases. Certified rheumatologists and trainees were primarily females. The factorial analysis revealed a 4-factor structure in the majority of the health care scenarios; these latent factors accounted for 54.6% to 65.4% of total variance. The first factor (\"Medications shortage and uncertainty\") explained the largest percentage of total variance of the treatment choice; this factor violates justice principle. The second factor (\"Patient-centered\") was associated with motivations related to the patient's sociodemographics, clinical aspects, and preferences, which is related to autonomy principle. The third factor (\"Accessibility and affordability\") impacts justice principle. The fourth factor (\"Evidence-based medicine and experience\") was related to beneficence and nonmaleficence principles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Making treatment decisions is influenced by factors that shape the ethical lattice physicians based their decisions upon.</p>","PeriodicalId":520664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Structure of Motivations Behind Physicians' Treatment Choices for Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: A Bioethical Analysis of a Cross-sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Irazú Contreras-Yáñez, Guillermo Guaracha-Basáñez, Diana Marcela Padilla-Ortiz, Virginia Pascual-Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>The framework for the study centered on the treatment decisions made by physicians during their medical encounters with patients with rheumatic diseases. Our primary objective was to analyze, from a bioethical perspective, the underlying latent factors that influence these treatment decisions, focusing on the physician motivations behind them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was carried out at an outpatient clinic where 14 certified rheumatologists and 10 trainees worked (February 2023-February 2024). Standardized data from 703 patient-physician encounters regarding the physician's treatment choice, their motivations, and patients' disease activity level were obtained. Exploratory factorial analysis defined how motivations integrate latent factors and structure treatment choices in various health care scenarios, defined by the physician choice and degree and the patient level of disease activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were primarily middle-aged women with long-standing rheumatic diseases. Certified rheumatologists and trainees were primarily females. The factorial analysis revealed a 4-factor structure in the majority of the health care scenarios; these latent factors accounted for 54.6% to 65.4% of total variance. The first factor (\\\"Medications shortage and uncertainty\\\") explained the largest percentage of total variance of the treatment choice; this factor violates justice principle. The second factor (\\\"Patient-centered\\\") was associated with motivations related to the patient's sociodemographics, clinical aspects, and preferences, which is related to autonomy principle. The third factor (\\\"Accessibility and affordability\\\") impacts justice principle. The fourth factor (\\\"Evidence-based medicine and experience\\\") was related to beneficence and nonmaleficence principles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Making treatment decisions is influenced by factors that shape the ethical lattice physicians based their decisions upon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究的框架集中于医生在与风湿病患者的医疗接触中做出的治疗决定。我们的主要目标是从生物伦理学的角度分析影响这些治疗决策的潜在因素,重点是医生背后的动机。方法:本横断面研究于2023年2月至2024年2月在一家门诊诊所进行,该诊所有14名认证风湿病学家和10名实习生工作。从703例患者与医生的接触中获得了关于医生治疗选择、他们的动机和患者疾病活动水平的标准化数据。探索性因子分析定义了动机如何整合潜在因素,并在各种医疗保健方案中结构治疗选择,由医生选择和程度以及患者疾病活动水平定义。结果:患者以长期风湿病的中年妇女为主。认证的风湿病学家和受训人员主要是女性。析因分析显示,在大多数卫生保健情景中存在4因素结构;这些潜在因素占总方差的54.6% ~ 65.4%。第一个因素(“药物短缺和不确定性”)解释了治疗选择总方差的最大百分比;这一因素违反了公正原则。第二个因素(“以患者为中心”)与患者的社会人口统计、临床方面和偏好相关的动机有关,这与自主原则有关。第三个因素(“可及性和可负担性”)影响司法原则。第四个因素(“循证医学和经验”)与有益和无害原则有关。结论:治疗决策受影响因素的影响,这些因素塑造了医生做出决定所依据的伦理格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Structure of Motivations Behind Physicians' Treatment Choices for Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: A Bioethical Analysis of a Cross-sectional Study.

Background/objective: The framework for the study centered on the treatment decisions made by physicians during their medical encounters with patients with rheumatic diseases. Our primary objective was to analyze, from a bioethical perspective, the underlying latent factors that influence these treatment decisions, focusing on the physician motivations behind them.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out at an outpatient clinic where 14 certified rheumatologists and 10 trainees worked (February 2023-February 2024). Standardized data from 703 patient-physician encounters regarding the physician's treatment choice, their motivations, and patients' disease activity level were obtained. Exploratory factorial analysis defined how motivations integrate latent factors and structure treatment choices in various health care scenarios, defined by the physician choice and degree and the patient level of disease activity.

Results: The patients were primarily middle-aged women with long-standing rheumatic diseases. Certified rheumatologists and trainees were primarily females. The factorial analysis revealed a 4-factor structure in the majority of the health care scenarios; these latent factors accounted for 54.6% to 65.4% of total variance. The first factor ("Medications shortage and uncertainty") explained the largest percentage of total variance of the treatment choice; this factor violates justice principle. The second factor ("Patient-centered") was associated with motivations related to the patient's sociodemographics, clinical aspects, and preferences, which is related to autonomy principle. The third factor ("Accessibility and affordability") impacts justice principle. The fourth factor ("Evidence-based medicine and experience") was related to beneficence and nonmaleficence principles.

Conclusions: Making treatment decisions is influenced by factors that shape the ethical lattice physicians based their decisions upon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信