Lihua Zhang, Bo Li, Rong Wang, Jie Li, Rong Cai, Fengbin Zhang, Fating Yang, Zixuan Liu, Lin Yang, Juan Ma, Xiaowei Yao, Qiuxia Hu, Linlin Xu, Jian Zang, Fei Bai, Lina Zhao
{"title":"前瞻性随机对照试验:37℃预热热塑性弹性体(TPE)丸在乳腺癌患者术后放疗中的疗效。","authors":"Lihua Zhang, Bo Li, Rong Wang, Jie Li, Rong Cai, Fengbin Zhang, Fating Yang, Zixuan Liu, Lin Yang, Juan Ma, Xiaowei Yao, Qiuxia Hu, Linlin Xu, Jian Zang, Fei Bai, Lina Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01763-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomized-controlled trial aimed to investigate whether preheating thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) bolus to 37 °C reduces setup errors and improves patient comfort during post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2023 to June 2024, breast cancer patients requiring PMRT were randomized (1:1) to receive either preheated (37 °C, 30 min) or room-temperature TPE bolus. Bolus was applied during the first half of treatment (15/25 or 8/15 fractions). Weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) assessed setup errors (lateral [Lat], longitudinal [Lng], vertical [Vrt], and rotational [Rtn]). Secondary endpoints included thorax anteroposterior diameter changes (ΔZ), skin toxicity (CTCAE v3.0), and comfort (modified Likert scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 154 analyzed patients, preheating significantly reduced Vrt (0.24 ± 2.43 mm vs. - 0.64 ± 2.46 mm, p < 0.01) and Lat errors (- 0.12 ± 2.49 mm vs. 0.63 ± 2.49 mm, p < 0.01). The preheating group reported higher temperature comfort scores (4.32 ± 0.55 vs. 3.59 ± 0.72, p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in Grade 2 (46.6% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.661) or Grade 3 (2.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 1.000) radiation dermatitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preheated TPE bolus improves setup accuracy in the Vrt and Lat directions, enhances patient comfort, and maintains skin safety, supporting its clinical utility in PMRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":520574,"journal":{"name":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective randomized-controlled trial: efficacy of 37 °C-preheated thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) bolus in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Lihua Zhang, Bo Li, Rong Wang, Jie Li, Rong Cai, Fengbin Zhang, Fating Yang, Zixuan Liu, Lin Yang, Juan Ma, Xiaowei Yao, Qiuxia Hu, Linlin Xu, Jian Zang, Fei Bai, Lina Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12282-025-01763-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomized-controlled trial aimed to investigate whether preheating thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) bolus to 37 °C reduces setup errors and improves patient comfort during post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2023 to June 2024, breast cancer patients requiring PMRT were randomized (1:1) to receive either preheated (37 °C, 30 min) or room-temperature TPE bolus. Bolus was applied during the first half of treatment (15/25 or 8/15 fractions). Weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) assessed setup errors (lateral [Lat], longitudinal [Lng], vertical [Vrt], and rotational [Rtn]). Secondary endpoints included thorax anteroposterior diameter changes (ΔZ), skin toxicity (CTCAE v3.0), and comfort (modified Likert scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 154 analyzed patients, preheating significantly reduced Vrt (0.24 ± 2.43 mm vs. - 0.64 ± 2.46 mm, p < 0.01) and Lat errors (- 0.12 ± 2.49 mm vs. 0.63 ± 2.49 mm, p < 0.01). The preheating group reported higher temperature comfort scores (4.32 ± 0.55 vs. 3.59 ± 0.72, p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in Grade 2 (46.6% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.661) or Grade 3 (2.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 1.000) radiation dermatitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preheated TPE bolus improves setup accuracy in the Vrt and Lat directions, enhances patient comfort, and maintains skin safety, supporting its clinical utility in PMRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01763-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01763-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本随机对照试验旨在探讨热塑性弹性体(TPE)预热至37°C是否可以减少乳房切除术后放疗(PMRT)期间的设置误差并改善患者舒适度。方法:从2023年7月至2024年6月,需要PMRT的乳腺癌患者随机(1:1)接受预热(37°C, 30 min)或室温TPE丸。在治疗的前半段使用丸剂(15/25或8/15分)。每周进行锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估安装误差(横向[Lat]、纵向[Lng]、垂直[Vrt]和旋转[Rtn])。次要终点包括胸前后径变化(ΔZ)、皮肤毒性(CTCAE v3.0)和舒适度(改良Likert量表)。结果:154例患者中,预热可显著降低Vrt(0.24±2.43 mm vs. - 0.64±2.46 mm)。结论:预热TPE丸可提高Vrt和lt方向的设置准确性,提高患者舒适度,维护皮肤安全,支持其在PMRT中的临床应用。
Prospective randomized-controlled trial: efficacy of 37 °C-preheated thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) bolus in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer patients.
Objective: This randomized-controlled trial aimed to investigate whether preheating thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) bolus to 37 °C reduces setup errors and improves patient comfort during post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT).
Methods: From July 2023 to June 2024, breast cancer patients requiring PMRT were randomized (1:1) to receive either preheated (37 °C, 30 min) or room-temperature TPE bolus. Bolus was applied during the first half of treatment (15/25 or 8/15 fractions). Weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) assessed setup errors (lateral [Lat], longitudinal [Lng], vertical [Vrt], and rotational [Rtn]). Secondary endpoints included thorax anteroposterior diameter changes (ΔZ), skin toxicity (CTCAE v3.0), and comfort (modified Likert scale).
Results: Among 154 analyzed patients, preheating significantly reduced Vrt (0.24 ± 2.43 mm vs. - 0.64 ± 2.46 mm, p < 0.01) and Lat errors (- 0.12 ± 2.49 mm vs. 0.63 ± 2.49 mm, p < 0.01). The preheating group reported higher temperature comfort scores (4.32 ± 0.55 vs. 3.59 ± 0.72, p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in Grade 2 (46.6% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.661) or Grade 3 (2.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 1.000) radiation dermatitis.
Conclusion: Preheated TPE bolus improves setup accuracy in the Vrt and Lat directions, enhances patient comfort, and maintains skin safety, supporting its clinical utility in PMRT.