高级临床医生在急诊科看到的患者7天非计划再出勤率:一项服务评估。

Rob Fenwick, Aimee Wright, Susan Dorrian, Mustafa Sajeel
{"title":"高级临床医生在急诊科看到的患者7天非计划再出勤率:一项服务评估。","authors":"Rob Fenwick, Aimee Wright, Susan Dorrian, Mustafa Sajeel","doi":"10.7748/en.2025.e2238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) have become an established part of the emergency medicine workforce in the UK. However, despite increasing numbers of ACPs working in emergency medicine, there is little evidence regarding their impact on care in this area and a lack of metrics available to assess their performance. To inform national benchmarking and comparisons between organisations, the authors of this article calculated the seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate for patients seen by ACPs at two emergency departments (EDs) in the UK and compared it with the rate for patients seen locally by all other clinicians and with the overall rate in England. Over a 12-month period, the seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate for ACPs was 5.9%, versus 6.7% for all other clinicians and 8.2% nationally. As a measurable and meaningful indicator of the quality of care, the seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate could be integrated into routine data collection and used constructively in the appraisal process and professional development of ACPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94315,"journal":{"name":"Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate for patients seen in the ED by advanced clinical practitioners: a service evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Rob Fenwick, Aimee Wright, Susan Dorrian, Mustafa Sajeel\",\"doi\":\"10.7748/en.2025.e2238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) have become an established part of the emergency medicine workforce in the UK. However, despite increasing numbers of ACPs working in emergency medicine, there is little evidence regarding their impact on care in this area and a lack of metrics available to assess their performance. To inform national benchmarking and comparisons between organisations, the authors of this article calculated the seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate for patients seen by ACPs at two emergency departments (EDs) in the UK and compared it with the rate for patients seen locally by all other clinicians and with the overall rate in England. Over a 12-month period, the seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate for ACPs was 5.9%, versus 6.7% for all other clinicians and 8.2% nationally. As a measurable and meaningful indicator of the quality of care, the seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate could be integrated into routine data collection and used constructively in the appraisal process and professional development of ACPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2025.e2238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2025.e2238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高级临床医生(ACPs)已成为英国急诊医学劳动力的一部分。然而,尽管越来越多的acp在急诊医学领域工作,但几乎没有证据表明他们对该领域护理的影响,也缺乏可用于评估其绩效的指标。为了给国家基准和组织之间的比较提供信息,本文的作者计算了acp在英国两个急诊科(ed)就诊的患者的7天计划外再出诊率,并将其与所有其他临床医生在当地就诊的患者的比率以及英格兰的总体比率进行了比较。在12个月的时间里,acp的7天计划外再出勤率为5.9%,而其他临床医生为6.7%,全国为8.2%。作为一项可测量且有意义的护理质量指标,7天非计划再出勤率可纳入日常数据收集,并建设性地用于acp的评估过程和专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate for patients seen in the ED by advanced clinical practitioners: a service evaluation.

Advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) have become an established part of the emergency medicine workforce in the UK. However, despite increasing numbers of ACPs working in emergency medicine, there is little evidence regarding their impact on care in this area and a lack of metrics available to assess their performance. To inform national benchmarking and comparisons between organisations, the authors of this article calculated the seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate for patients seen by ACPs at two emergency departments (EDs) in the UK and compared it with the rate for patients seen locally by all other clinicians and with the overall rate in England. Over a 12-month period, the seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate for ACPs was 5.9%, versus 6.7% for all other clinicians and 8.2% nationally. As a measurable and meaningful indicator of the quality of care, the seven-day unplanned re-attendance rate could be integrated into routine data collection and used constructively in the appraisal process and professional development of ACPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信