用管状牵开系统显微微创切除脊柱肿瘤70例分析并文献复习。

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1806866
Mohan Karki, Rakesh Pandey, Manish Vaish, Girish Rajpal, Yaspal Singh Bundela, Hrishikesh Chakrabartty, Dipanshu Narula
{"title":"用管状牵开系统显微微创切除脊柱肿瘤70例分析并文献复习。","authors":"Mohan Karki, Rakesh Pandey, Manish Vaish, Girish Rajpal, Yaspal Singh Bundela, Hrishikesh Chakrabartty, Dipanshu Narula","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1806866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimal invasive spine surgery with tubular retractor system avoids contralateral laminectomy, minimizes manipulation of midline supportive structures, and reduces surgical morbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microscopic minimal invasive tubular retractor system for intradural spinal tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed in 70 patients who were admitted between January 2017 and January 2024 with intradural spinal tumors and underwent excision with microscopic minimal invasive tubular retractor system. Patient's data including age, sex, clinical symptoms, and magnetic resonance imaging were collected. The extent of resection, surgical complications, estimated blood loss, estimated surgical time, and neurological outcomes were recorded. The neurological assessment was done by the modified McCormick grading scale pre- and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 70 patients, there were 38 (54.28%) males and 32 (45.71%) females, with a mean age of 45.16 (range: 8-79) years. The histology of these cases was meningioma (34.28%), schwannoma (51.42%), astrocytoma (2.85%), ependymoma (2.85%), and neurofibroma (8.57%). The average volume of tumors was 1.98 cm <sup>3</sup> , and gross total resection was achieved in 64 (91.53%) cases and subtotal resection was achieved in 6 (8.57%) cases. One patient had neurological deterioration, which was improved on follow-up after 6 months, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage was noted in one case, which recovered after keeping lumbar drain for 5 days. No permanent neurological deficits were observed compared with their preoperative status, with improvement noted in visual analog scale and modified McCormick grade in all cases in the long-term follow-up evaluation (6-24 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microscopic minimal invasive resection of intradural spinal tumor by the tubular retractor system is safe and effective with excellent neurological improvement as well as better resection rate, short hospital stay, and less surgical complication.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"20 3","pages":"491-497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microscopic Minimal Invasive Resection of Spinal Tumor with Tubular Retractor System: Case Studies of 70 Patients with Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mohan Karki, Rakesh Pandey, Manish Vaish, Girish Rajpal, Yaspal Singh Bundela, Hrishikesh Chakrabartty, Dipanshu Narula\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1806866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimal invasive spine surgery with tubular retractor system avoids contralateral laminectomy, minimizes manipulation of midline supportive structures, and reduces surgical morbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microscopic minimal invasive tubular retractor system for intradural spinal tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed in 70 patients who were admitted between January 2017 and January 2024 with intradural spinal tumors and underwent excision with microscopic minimal invasive tubular retractor system. Patient's data including age, sex, clinical symptoms, and magnetic resonance imaging were collected. The extent of resection, surgical complications, estimated blood loss, estimated surgical time, and neurological outcomes were recorded. The neurological assessment was done by the modified McCormick grading scale pre- and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 70 patients, there were 38 (54.28%) males and 32 (45.71%) females, with a mean age of 45.16 (range: 8-79) years. The histology of these cases was meningioma (34.28%), schwannoma (51.42%), astrocytoma (2.85%), ependymoma (2.85%), and neurofibroma (8.57%). The average volume of tumors was 1.98 cm <sup>3</sup> , and gross total resection was achieved in 64 (91.53%) cases and subtotal resection was achieved in 6 (8.57%) cases. One patient had neurological deterioration, which was improved on follow-up after 6 months, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage was noted in one case, which recovered after keeping lumbar drain for 5 days. No permanent neurological deficits were observed compared with their preoperative status, with improvement noted in visual analog scale and modified McCormick grade in all cases in the long-term follow-up evaluation (6-24 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microscopic minimal invasive resection of intradural spinal tumor by the tubular retractor system is safe and effective with excellent neurological improvement as well as better resection rate, short hospital stay, and less surgical complication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"491-497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370329/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1806866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1806866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用管状牵开系统进行微创脊柱手术,避免了对侧椎板切除,减少了对中线支撑结构的操作,降低了手术发病率。本研究的目的是评估显微微创管状牵开系统在硬膜内脊髓肿瘤切除术中的安全性和有效性。材料与方法:回顾性研究2017年1月至2024年1月收治的70例硬膜内脊髓肿瘤患者,采用显微微创管状牵开系统进行手术切除。收集患者的年龄、性别、临床症状、磁共振成像等资料。记录切除范围、手术并发症、估计失血量、估计手术时间和神经预后。术前和术后采用改良的McCormick评分法进行神经学评估。结果:70例患者中,男性38例(54.28%),女性32例(45.71%),平均年龄45.16岁(8 ~ 79岁)。组织学以脑膜瘤(34.28%)、神经鞘瘤(51.42%)、星形细胞瘤(2.85%)、室管膜瘤(2.85%)、神经纤维瘤(8.57%)为主。肿瘤平均体积为1.98 cm 3,全部切除64例(91.53%),次全切除6例(8.57%)。1例患者神经功能恶化,随访6个月后好转,1例出现脑脊液漏,保持腰椎引流5天后恢复。与术前状态相比,未观察到永久性神经功能缺损,在长期随访评估(6-24个月)中,所有病例的视觉模拟量表和改良的McCormick评分均有改善。结论:管状牵开系统显微微创切除脊髓硬膜内肿瘤安全有效,神经功能改善好,切除率高,住院时间短,手术并发症少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Microscopic Minimal Invasive Resection of Spinal Tumor with Tubular Retractor System: Case Studies of 70 Patients with Literature Review.

Microscopic Minimal Invasive Resection of Spinal Tumor with Tubular Retractor System: Case Studies of 70 Patients with Literature Review.

Microscopic Minimal Invasive Resection of Spinal Tumor with Tubular Retractor System: Case Studies of 70 Patients with Literature Review.

Objective: Minimal invasive spine surgery with tubular retractor system avoids contralateral laminectomy, minimizes manipulation of midline supportive structures, and reduces surgical morbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microscopic minimal invasive tubular retractor system for intradural spinal tumor resection.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed in 70 patients who were admitted between January 2017 and January 2024 with intradural spinal tumors and underwent excision with microscopic minimal invasive tubular retractor system. Patient's data including age, sex, clinical symptoms, and magnetic resonance imaging were collected. The extent of resection, surgical complications, estimated blood loss, estimated surgical time, and neurological outcomes were recorded. The neurological assessment was done by the modified McCormick grading scale pre- and postoperatively.

Results: Out of 70 patients, there were 38 (54.28%) males and 32 (45.71%) females, with a mean age of 45.16 (range: 8-79) years. The histology of these cases was meningioma (34.28%), schwannoma (51.42%), astrocytoma (2.85%), ependymoma (2.85%), and neurofibroma (8.57%). The average volume of tumors was 1.98 cm 3 , and gross total resection was achieved in 64 (91.53%) cases and subtotal resection was achieved in 6 (8.57%) cases. One patient had neurological deterioration, which was improved on follow-up after 6 months, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage was noted in one case, which recovered after keeping lumbar drain for 5 days. No permanent neurological deficits were observed compared with their preoperative status, with improvement noted in visual analog scale and modified McCormick grade in all cases in the long-term follow-up evaluation (6-24 months).

Conclusion: Microscopic minimal invasive resection of intradural spinal tumor by the tubular retractor system is safe and effective with excellent neurological improvement as well as better resection rate, short hospital stay, and less surgical complication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信