一杯就够了吗?速度堆叠过程中的能量消耗水平。

IF 1.6
Samuel C Hymes, Ryan S Sacko, Grace Duncan, Tim Bott
{"title":"一杯就够了吗?速度堆叠过程中的能量消耗水平。","authors":"Samuel C Hymes, Ryan S Sacko, Grace Duncan, Tim Bott","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2025.2549064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated whether Speed Stacking elicits sufficient physiological intensity to meet moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) thresholds in youth, using portable indirect calorimetry and accelerometry. Fifty-four participants (<i>M</i>age = 14.01 ± 5.48 years; 46.3% female) completed four randomized activity conditions: Rest, Speed Stacking, Running, and Speed Stack + Run, each lasting five minutes. Participants wore a COSMED K5 metabolic system, hip and wrist ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers, and a heart rate monitor. Energy expenditure (METs), accelerometer counts, perceived exertion, and fun were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVAs and Cohen's Kappa for method agreement. In both prepubescent and pubescent groups, Speed Stacking alone did not meet the specific MET thresholds for MVPA. However, the hybrid Stack + Run condition significantly increased METs (up to 5.1 ± 1.2 in prepubescents). Cohen's Kappa revealed poor agreement between MET-based and accelerometer-based intensity categorical classifications across all conditions. Participants, especially younger children, reported Speed Stacking as fun but minimally effortful. Speed Stacking alone fails to meet key pedagogical criteria for physical education, particularly those related to maximizing activity time and MVPA engagement. Given the limited time available in PE settings, alternative activities with higher energy expenditure may offer a more efficient use of instructional time. However, when integrated with movement-based tasks, Speed Stacking can be adapted to better support physical and educational outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is a Cup Enough? Levels of Energy Expenditure During Speed Stacking.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel C Hymes, Ryan S Sacko, Grace Duncan, Tim Bott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701367.2025.2549064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated whether Speed Stacking elicits sufficient physiological intensity to meet moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) thresholds in youth, using portable indirect calorimetry and accelerometry. Fifty-four participants (<i>M</i>age = 14.01 ± 5.48 years; 46.3% female) completed four randomized activity conditions: Rest, Speed Stacking, Running, and Speed Stack + Run, each lasting five minutes. Participants wore a COSMED K5 metabolic system, hip and wrist ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers, and a heart rate monitor. Energy expenditure (METs), accelerometer counts, perceived exertion, and fun were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVAs and Cohen's Kappa for method agreement. In both prepubescent and pubescent groups, Speed Stacking alone did not meet the specific MET thresholds for MVPA. However, the hybrid Stack + Run condition significantly increased METs (up to 5.1 ± 1.2 in prepubescents). Cohen's Kappa revealed poor agreement between MET-based and accelerometer-based intensity categorical classifications across all conditions. Participants, especially younger children, reported Speed Stacking as fun but minimally effortful. Speed Stacking alone fails to meet key pedagogical criteria for physical education, particularly those related to maximizing activity time and MVPA engagement. Given the limited time available in PE settings, alternative activities with higher energy expenditure may offer a more efficient use of instructional time. However, when integrated with movement-based tasks, Speed Stacking can be adapted to better support physical and educational outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research quarterly for exercise and sport\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research quarterly for exercise and sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2025.2549064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2025.2549064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用便携式间接量热仪和加速度计评估了速度叠加是否能引起足够的生理强度以满足青少年中至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)阈值。54名参与者(年龄为14.01±5.48岁,女性占46.3%)完成了四项随机活动条件:休息、速度叠加、跑步和速度叠加+跑步,每项持续5分钟。参与者佩戴了COSMED K5代谢系统、髋关节和腕部ActiGraph GT3X+加速计以及心率监测器。能量消耗(METs)、加速度计计数、感知运动和乐趣使用重复测量方差分析(anova)和Cohen’s Kappa进行方法一致性分析。在青春期前和青春期组中,单独的速度堆叠不能满足MVPA的特定MET阈值。然而,混合Stack + Run条件显著增加METs(在青春期前达到5.1±1.2)。Cohen的Kappa研究显示,在所有条件下,基于met的强度分类和基于加速度计的强度分类之间的一致性很差。参与者,尤其是年幼的孩子,报告说快速堆叠很有趣,但不太费力。单靠速度叠加法无法满足体育教学的关键教学标准,尤其是那些与最大化活动时间和MVPA参与有关的标准。考虑到体育教学的时间有限,需要更多能量消耗的替代活动可以更有效地利用教学时间。然而,当与基于运动的任务相结合时,速度堆叠可以更好地支持身体和教育成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is a Cup Enough? Levels of Energy Expenditure During Speed Stacking.

This study evaluated whether Speed Stacking elicits sufficient physiological intensity to meet moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) thresholds in youth, using portable indirect calorimetry and accelerometry. Fifty-four participants (Mage = 14.01 ± 5.48 years; 46.3% female) completed four randomized activity conditions: Rest, Speed Stacking, Running, and Speed Stack + Run, each lasting five minutes. Participants wore a COSMED K5 metabolic system, hip and wrist ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers, and a heart rate monitor. Energy expenditure (METs), accelerometer counts, perceived exertion, and fun were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVAs and Cohen's Kappa for method agreement. In both prepubescent and pubescent groups, Speed Stacking alone did not meet the specific MET thresholds for MVPA. However, the hybrid Stack + Run condition significantly increased METs (up to 5.1 ± 1.2 in prepubescents). Cohen's Kappa revealed poor agreement between MET-based and accelerometer-based intensity categorical classifications across all conditions. Participants, especially younger children, reported Speed Stacking as fun but minimally effortful. Speed Stacking alone fails to meet key pedagogical criteria for physical education, particularly those related to maximizing activity time and MVPA engagement. Given the limited time available in PE settings, alternative activities with higher energy expenditure may offer a more efficient use of instructional time. However, when integrated with movement-based tasks, Speed Stacking can be adapted to better support physical and educational outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信