Ellen Boldrup Tingleff, Sofie Louise Aslerin, Signe Unmack Larsen, Camilla Rosendal Lindekilde, Martin Locht Pedersen, Frederik Alkier Gildberg
{"title":"干预措施的内容和可行性,以减少机械约束的使用在成人法医精神卫生住院设置:服务用户的定性研究,亲属和工作人员的看法在丹麦。","authors":"Ellen Boldrup Tingleff, Sofie Louise Aslerin, Signe Unmack Larsen, Camilla Rosendal Lindekilde, Martin Locht Pedersen, Frederik Alkier Gildberg","doi":"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most interventions aimed at reducing mechanical restraint (MR) have not been adapted to forensic mental health settings (FMHS) and rarely consider the perspectives of service users (SUs), relatives, and staff.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the perceptions of SUs, relatives, and staff regarding the content and feasibility of seven interventions to reduce MR use in adult FMHS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured, one-on-one, and group interviews with SUs, relatives, and staff within an FMHS and analyzed the data using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven categories were produced: building relationships, expanding patient-related knowledge, applying de-escalation methods, optimizing staffing levels, increasing availability, improving collaboration, and promoting professional staff attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strengthening relationships is fundamental to the feasibility of most interventions aimed at reducing MR episodes. SU-staff relations depend on staff's knowledge of and genuine engagement with SUs, while staff-staff dynamics are built on trust and collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":94079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content and Feasibility of Interventions to Reduce Mechanical Restraint Use in Adult Forensic Mental Health Inpatient Settings: A Qualitative Study of Service Users', Relatives', and Staff's Perceptions in Denmark.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Boldrup Tingleff, Sofie Louise Aslerin, Signe Unmack Larsen, Camilla Rosendal Lindekilde, Martin Locht Pedersen, Frederik Alkier Gildberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most interventions aimed at reducing mechanical restraint (MR) have not been adapted to forensic mental health settings (FMHS) and rarely consider the perspectives of service users (SUs), relatives, and staff.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the perceptions of SUs, relatives, and staff regarding the content and feasibility of seven interventions to reduce MR use in adult FMHS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured, one-on-one, and group interviews with SUs, relatives, and staff within an FMHS and analyzed the data using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven categories were produced: building relationships, expanding patient-related knowledge, applying de-escalation methods, optimizing staffing levels, increasing availability, improving collaboration, and promoting professional staff attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strengthening relationships is fundamental to the feasibility of most interventions aimed at reducing MR episodes. SU-staff relations depend on staff's knowledge of and genuine engagement with SUs, while staff-staff dynamics are built on trust and collaboration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Content and Feasibility of Interventions to Reduce Mechanical Restraint Use in Adult Forensic Mental Health Inpatient Settings: A Qualitative Study of Service Users', Relatives', and Staff's Perceptions in Denmark.
Introduction: Most interventions aimed at reducing mechanical restraint (MR) have not been adapted to forensic mental health settings (FMHS) and rarely consider the perspectives of service users (SUs), relatives, and staff.
Aim: To investigate the perceptions of SUs, relatives, and staff regarding the content and feasibility of seven interventions to reduce MR use in adult FMHS.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured, one-on-one, and group interviews with SUs, relatives, and staff within an FMHS and analyzed the data using content analysis.
Results: Seven categories were produced: building relationships, expanding patient-related knowledge, applying de-escalation methods, optimizing staffing levels, increasing availability, improving collaboration, and promoting professional staff attitudes.
Conclusions: Strengthening relationships is fundamental to the feasibility of most interventions aimed at reducing MR episodes. SU-staff relations depend on staff's knowledge of and genuine engagement with SUs, while staff-staff dynamics are built on trust and collaboration.