整合普通外科住院医师健康公平课程:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2.1
Ariana Naaseh, Tiffany K Brocke, Oluseye K Oduyale, Katharine E Caldwell, Shaleen V Sathe, Erika A Waters, Bettina Drake, Paul E Wise
{"title":"整合普通外科住院医师健康公平课程:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Ariana Naaseh, Tiffany K Brocke, Oluseye K Oduyale, Katharine E Caldwell, Shaleen V Sathe, Erika A Waters, Bettina Drake, Paul E Wise","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-quality patient care necessitates knowledge of health disparities and strategies for cultural humility, yet no widely accepted health equity curriculum is available for general surgery residents. We developed such a curriculum based on adult learning theory and local public health priorities. The format included quarterly cultural complications Morbidity and Mortality conferences, interprofessional panels, and case-based discussions. We aimed to assess the impact of the integration of this curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Postsession surveys and focus groups with general surgery residents who participated in the health equity curriculum were assessed at a single academic institution. Open-ended focus group questions were designed to learn more about residents' experiences with the curriculum and the impact it has had on their thinking, clinical practice, and interactions with patients and staff. Transcripts were coded inductively by 2 independent researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 143 evaluations were collected and twelve residents participated in 2 focus groups. An institutional commitment to the curriculum itself promoted both self-reflection and formal/informal discourse between department members across the surgical hierarchy. Residents described moral distress related to their shortcomings in practicing equitable medicine secondary to systems-level pressures. They felt most empowered when sessions provided them with practical applications to patient care, which was also perceived as a strategy for reaching residents with low buy-in to the curriculum. Residents believe that health equity education must be tailored to the needs and assets of the local community. Noticeably, despite positive survey reviews, residents rarely commented on the impact of the anti-racism sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a health equity curriculum for general surgery residents is feasible. Further study is needed to develop health equity curricular content that maximizes direct clinical applicability for surgical trainees as well as personal reflection with particular attention to more challenging topics like anti-racism.</p>","PeriodicalId":94109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical education","volume":" ","pages":"103678"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating a Health Equity Curriculum for General Surgery Residents: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ariana Naaseh, Tiffany K Brocke, Oluseye K Oduyale, Katharine E Caldwell, Shaleen V Sathe, Erika A Waters, Bettina Drake, Paul E Wise\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-quality patient care necessitates knowledge of health disparities and strategies for cultural humility, yet no widely accepted health equity curriculum is available for general surgery residents. We developed such a curriculum based on adult learning theory and local public health priorities. The format included quarterly cultural complications Morbidity and Mortality conferences, interprofessional panels, and case-based discussions. We aimed to assess the impact of the integration of this curriculum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Postsession surveys and focus groups with general surgery residents who participated in the health equity curriculum were assessed at a single academic institution. Open-ended focus group questions were designed to learn more about residents' experiences with the curriculum and the impact it has had on their thinking, clinical practice, and interactions with patients and staff. Transcripts were coded inductively by 2 independent researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 143 evaluations were collected and twelve residents participated in 2 focus groups. An institutional commitment to the curriculum itself promoted both self-reflection and formal/informal discourse between department members across the surgical hierarchy. Residents described moral distress related to their shortcomings in practicing equitable medicine secondary to systems-level pressures. They felt most empowered when sessions provided them with practical applications to patient care, which was also perceived as a strategy for reaching residents with low buy-in to the curriculum. Residents believe that health equity education must be tailored to the needs and assets of the local community. Noticeably, despite positive survey reviews, residents rarely commented on the impact of the anti-racism sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a health equity curriculum for general surgery residents is feasible. Further study is needed to develop health equity curricular content that maximizes direct clinical applicability for surgical trainees as well as personal reflection with particular attention to more challenging topics like anti-racism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"103678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高质量的病人护理需要了解健康差异和文化谦逊的策略,但没有广泛接受的健康公平课程可供普通外科住院医师使用。我们根据成人学习理论和当地公共卫生优先事项制定了这样的课程。会议形式包括季度文化并发症发病率和死亡率会议、跨专业小组和基于病例的讨论。我们的目的是评估这门课程整合的影响。方法:在单一学术机构对参加健康公平课程的普外科住院医师进行课后调查和焦点小组评估。开放式焦点小组问题的设计是为了更多地了解住院医生对课程的体验,以及它对他们的思维、临床实践以及与病人和工作人员的互动产生的影响。转录本由2名独立研究人员进行归纳编码。结果:共收集评价143份,12名住院医师参与2个焦点小组。对课程本身的制度性承诺促进了整个外科层级的部门成员之间的自我反思和正式/非正式的对话。居民们描述了与他们在实践公平医疗方面的缺点相关的道德困境,这些缺点仅次于系统层面的压力。当课程为他们提供病人护理的实际应用时,他们感到最有权力,这也被认为是一种策略,可以接触到对课程不太认同的住院医生。居民们认为,健康公平教育必须根据当地社区的需要和资产进行调整。值得注意的是,尽管有积极的调查评价,居民很少评论反种族主义会议的影响。结论:在普外科住院医师中实施健康公平课程是可行的。需要进一步研究制定健康公平课程内容,最大限度地提高外科受训者的直接临床适用性以及个人反思,特别注意反种族主义等更具挑战性的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating a Health Equity Curriculum for General Surgery Residents: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Background: High-quality patient care necessitates knowledge of health disparities and strategies for cultural humility, yet no widely accepted health equity curriculum is available for general surgery residents. We developed such a curriculum based on adult learning theory and local public health priorities. The format included quarterly cultural complications Morbidity and Mortality conferences, interprofessional panels, and case-based discussions. We aimed to assess the impact of the integration of this curriculum.

Methods: Postsession surveys and focus groups with general surgery residents who participated in the health equity curriculum were assessed at a single academic institution. Open-ended focus group questions were designed to learn more about residents' experiences with the curriculum and the impact it has had on their thinking, clinical practice, and interactions with patients and staff. Transcripts were coded inductively by 2 independent researchers.

Results: About 143 evaluations were collected and twelve residents participated in 2 focus groups. An institutional commitment to the curriculum itself promoted both self-reflection and formal/informal discourse between department members across the surgical hierarchy. Residents described moral distress related to their shortcomings in practicing equitable medicine secondary to systems-level pressures. They felt most empowered when sessions provided them with practical applications to patient care, which was also perceived as a strategy for reaching residents with low buy-in to the curriculum. Residents believe that health equity education must be tailored to the needs and assets of the local community. Noticeably, despite positive survey reviews, residents rarely commented on the impact of the anti-racism sessions.

Conclusions: The implementation of a health equity curriculum for general surgery residents is feasible. Further study is needed to develop health equity curricular content that maximizes direct clinical applicability for surgical trainees as well as personal reflection with particular attention to more challenging topics like anti-racism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信