Chandni Radia, Yaa Danso, Susan Ritchie, Melissa Hale, Alexander T Elford, Chirag Patel, Lucy Hicks, Sonia Kalyanji, Chaonan Dong, Katie Yeung, Jie Han Yeo, Mohammed Allah-Ditta, Maria Bishara, Karishma Sethi-Arora, Lushen Pillay, Emma L Johnston, Ruth Rudling, Fiona Rees, Philip Harvey, Hannah Trodden-Mittnacht, Emma Davis, Aileen Fraser, Nitish Jivan Sawan, Muhammad Azhar Hussain, Roisin Campbell, Becky George, Megan Rawcliffe, Xin Yi Choon, Krishna Shah, Dania Al-Zarrad, Jennifer Toft, Puneet Chhabra, Nick Burr, Alice Hewitt, Rohith Kumar, Sara McCartney, Konstantina Rosiou, Anjan Dhar, Charlie W Lees, Christopher A Lamb, Ally Speight, Tariq Ahmad, Jimmy Limdi, Tim Raine, Alissa Walsh, Rachel Cooney, Paul Harrow, Kamal Patel, Mark Samaan, Polychronis Pavlidis, Alexandra Kent, Christian Selinger, Klaartje Kok
{"title":"2次JAKi治疗UC值得吗？英国多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Chandni Radia, Yaa Danso, Susan Ritchie, Melissa Hale, Alexander T Elford, Chirag Patel, Lucy Hicks, Sonia Kalyanji, Chaonan Dong, Katie Yeung, Jie Han Yeo, Mohammed Allah-Ditta, Maria Bishara, Karishma Sethi-Arora, Lushen Pillay, Emma L Johnston, Ruth Rudling, Fiona Rees, Philip Harvey, Hannah Trodden-Mittnacht, Emma Davis, Aileen Fraser, Nitish Jivan Sawan, Muhammad Azhar Hussain, Roisin Campbell, Becky George, Megan Rawcliffe, Xin Yi Choon, Krishna Shah, Dania Al-Zarrad, Jennifer Toft, Puneet Chhabra, Nick Burr, Alice Hewitt, Rohith Kumar, Sara McCartney, Konstantina Rosiou, Anjan Dhar, Charlie W Lees, Christopher A Lamb, Ally Speight, Tariq Ahmad, Jimmy Limdi, Tim Raine, Alissa Walsh, Rachel Cooney, Paul Harrow, Kamal Patel, Mark Samaan, Polychronis Pavlidis, Alexandra Kent, Christian Selinger, Klaartje Kok","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) provide effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), but inadequate response (IR) or intolerance occurs frequently. This study aimed to assess effectiveness of a second JAKi in a real-world UC cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicentre cohort study encompassing 19 UK hospitals was undertaken. Primary outcome was clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index/partial Mayo Score ≤ 1) at weeks 8 and 24, based on available assessments. Biochemical (CRP ≤ 5mg/L and faecal calprotectin ≤ 200µg/g) and endoscopic (Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity/Mayo Endoscopic Subscore ≤ 1) remission were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>131 patients with active UC were included. Majority (60%) had exposure to ≥ 3 advanced therapies and 50% required corticosteroids at induction. Clinical remission rates were 59% and 51% at weeks 8 and 24. Biochemical and endoscopic remission rates were 61% and 60% at week 8 and 47% and 32% at week 24. All disease activity parameters significantly reduced by week 8 (p < 0.001). At week 24 no difference was detected in clinical remission rates between those with primary non-response (42%) or secondary loss of response (52%) to their first JAKi (p = 0.518). Clinical remission did not differ between upadacitinib (54%) and filgotinib (36%), p = 0.253. Adverse events occurred in 27% of patients, and serious adverse events in 8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this highly refractory cohort with active UC a second JAKi effectively achieved remission following IR to first JAKi. Type of first JAKi failure did not appear to influence clinical remission. No new safety signals were found.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is 2nd JAKi treatment for UC worth the effort? A retrospective, multi-Centre UK study.\",\"authors\":\"Chandni Radia, Yaa Danso, Susan Ritchie, Melissa Hale, Alexander T Elford, Chirag Patel, Lucy Hicks, Sonia Kalyanji, Chaonan Dong, Katie Yeung, Jie Han Yeo, Mohammed Allah-Ditta, Maria Bishara, Karishma Sethi-Arora, Lushen Pillay, Emma L Johnston, Ruth Rudling, Fiona Rees, Philip Harvey, Hannah Trodden-Mittnacht, Emma Davis, Aileen Fraser, Nitish Jivan Sawan, Muhammad Azhar Hussain, Roisin Campbell, Becky George, Megan Rawcliffe, Xin Yi Choon, Krishna Shah, Dania Al-Zarrad, Jennifer Toft, Puneet Chhabra, Nick Burr, Alice Hewitt, Rohith Kumar, Sara McCartney, Konstantina Rosiou, Anjan Dhar, Charlie W Lees, Christopher A Lamb, Ally Speight, Tariq Ahmad, Jimmy Limdi, Tim Raine, Alissa Walsh, Rachel Cooney, Paul Harrow, Kamal Patel, Mark Samaan, Polychronis Pavlidis, Alexandra Kent, Christian Selinger, Klaartje Kok\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) provide effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), but inadequate response (IR) or intolerance occurs frequently. This study aimed to assess effectiveness of a second JAKi in a real-world UC cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicentre cohort study encompassing 19 UK hospitals was undertaken. Primary outcome was clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index/partial Mayo Score ≤ 1) at weeks 8 and 24, based on available assessments. Biochemical (CRP ≤ 5mg/L and faecal calprotectin ≤ 200µg/g) and endoscopic (Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity/Mayo Endoscopic Subscore ≤ 1) remission were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>131 patients with active UC were included. Majority (60%) had exposure to ≥ 3 advanced therapies and 50% required corticosteroids at induction. Clinical remission rates were 59% and 51% at weeks 8 and 24. Biochemical and endoscopic remission rates were 61% and 60% at week 8 and 47% and 32% at week 24. All disease activity parameters significantly reduced by week 8 (p < 0.001). At week 24 no difference was detected in clinical remission rates between those with primary non-response (42%) or secondary loss of response (52%) to their first JAKi (p = 0.518). Clinical remission did not differ between upadacitinib (54%) and filgotinib (36%), p = 0.253. Adverse events occurred in 27% of patients, and serious adverse events in 8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this highly refractory cohort with active UC a second JAKi effectively achieved remission following IR to first JAKi. Type of first JAKi failure did not appear to influence clinical remission. No new safety signals were found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is 2nd JAKi treatment for UC worth the effort? A retrospective, multi-Centre UK study.
Background and aims: Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) provide effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), but inadequate response (IR) or intolerance occurs frequently. This study aimed to assess effectiveness of a second JAKi in a real-world UC cohort.
Methods: A retrospective multicentre cohort study encompassing 19 UK hospitals was undertaken. Primary outcome was clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index/partial Mayo Score ≤ 1) at weeks 8 and 24, based on available assessments. Biochemical (CRP ≤ 5mg/L and faecal calprotectin ≤ 200µg/g) and endoscopic (Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity/Mayo Endoscopic Subscore ≤ 1) remission were also assessed.
Results: 131 patients with active UC were included. Majority (60%) had exposure to ≥ 3 advanced therapies and 50% required corticosteroids at induction. Clinical remission rates were 59% and 51% at weeks 8 and 24. Biochemical and endoscopic remission rates were 61% and 60% at week 8 and 47% and 32% at week 24. All disease activity parameters significantly reduced by week 8 (p < 0.001). At week 24 no difference was detected in clinical remission rates between those with primary non-response (42%) or secondary loss of response (52%) to their first JAKi (p = 0.518). Clinical remission did not differ between upadacitinib (54%) and filgotinib (36%), p = 0.253. Adverse events occurred in 27% of patients, and serious adverse events in 8%.
Conclusions: In this highly refractory cohort with active UC a second JAKi effectively achieved remission following IR to first JAKi. Type of first JAKi failure did not appear to influence clinical remission. No new safety signals were found.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
