生物制剂和/或小分子联合治疗炎症性肠病:综合综述

IF 8.7
Javier P Gisbert, María Chaparro
{"title":"生物制剂和/或小分子联合治疗炎症性肠病:综合综述","authors":"Javier P Gisbert, María Chaparro","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced combination treatment (ACT)-the combination of two advanced agents such as biologics or small molecules-has emerged as a promising strategy in the management of inflammatory bowel disease refractory to conventional treatment, with severe extraintestinal manifestations, or with coexisting immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. ACT including complementary mechanisms of action aims to overcome the therapeutic ceiling observed with monotherapy. Its rationale is supported by preclinical and mechanistic data demonstrating synergistic immunological effects when distinct inflammatory pathways are targeted simultaneously. Although observational studies report pooled clinical and endoscopic remission rates of approximately 60% and 30%, respectively, the quality of evidence remains very limited. Most studies are retrospective, heterogeneous in patient populations and treatment regimens, and often report outcomes in aggregate, precluding firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of specific drug combinations. The two and only randomised controlled trials available to date have shown acceptable safety profiles but limited or no clear superiority of ACT over monotherapy. Safety data are reassuring, with no significant increase in serious adverse events. The optimal duration of ACT remains uncertain; while de-escalation to monotherapy following deep remission is feasible in selected patients, relapse rates vary, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment decisions and long-term follow-up. High treatment costs also pose a barrier to widespread adoption of ACT, though biosimilars may help offset these concerns. In summary, ACT may represent a potentially valuable therapeutic option in selected high-risk or treatment-resistant patients with inflammatory bowel disease; however, its true clinical benefit remains uncertain and requires confirmation through robust, well-powered randomised controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination therapy with biologics and/or small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease: a comprehensive review.\",\"authors\":\"Javier P Gisbert, María Chaparro\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advanced combination treatment (ACT)-the combination of two advanced agents such as biologics or small molecules-has emerged as a promising strategy in the management of inflammatory bowel disease refractory to conventional treatment, with severe extraintestinal manifestations, or with coexisting immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. ACT including complementary mechanisms of action aims to overcome the therapeutic ceiling observed with monotherapy. Its rationale is supported by preclinical and mechanistic data demonstrating synergistic immunological effects when distinct inflammatory pathways are targeted simultaneously. Although observational studies report pooled clinical and endoscopic remission rates of approximately 60% and 30%, respectively, the quality of evidence remains very limited. Most studies are retrospective, heterogeneous in patient populations and treatment regimens, and often report outcomes in aggregate, precluding firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of specific drug combinations. The two and only randomised controlled trials available to date have shown acceptable safety profiles but limited or no clear superiority of ACT over monotherapy. Safety data are reassuring, with no significant increase in serious adverse events. The optimal duration of ACT remains uncertain; while de-escalation to monotherapy following deep remission is feasible in selected patients, relapse rates vary, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment decisions and long-term follow-up. High treatment costs also pose a barrier to widespread adoption of ACT, though biosimilars may help offset these concerns. In summary, ACT may represent a potentially valuable therapeutic option in selected high-risk or treatment-resistant patients with inflammatory bowel disease; however, its true clinical benefit remains uncertain and requires confirmation through robust, well-powered randomised controlled trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高级联合治疗(ACT)-两种先进药物如生物制剂或小分子药物的联合治疗-已成为治疗传统治疗难治性炎症性肠病,具有严重肠外表现或共存免疫介导的炎症性疾病的一种有前途的策略。ACT包括补充作用机制,旨在克服单药治疗中观察到的治疗上限。临床前和机制数据表明,当不同的炎症途径同时靶向时,其协同免疫效应支持其基本原理。尽管观察性研究报告了临床和内镜下缓解率分别约为60%和30%,但证据质量仍然非常有限。大多数研究都是回顾性的,在患者群体和治疗方案方面存在异质性,并且经常报告总体结果,排除了关于特定药物组合疗效的确切结论。迄今为止仅有的两项随机对照试验显示出可接受的安全性,但ACT相对于单药治疗的优势有限或没有明显的优势。安全性数据令人放心,严重不良事件没有显著增加。ACT的最佳持续时间仍不确定;虽然在某些患者中,深度缓解后降级到单药治疗是可行的,但复发率各不相同,这强调了个性化治疗决策和长期随访的必要性。高昂的治疗费用也对广泛采用ACT构成障碍,尽管生物仿制药可能有助于抵消这些担忧。综上所述,对于某些高风险或治疗耐药的炎症性肠病患者,ACT可能是一种潜在的有价值的治疗选择;然而,它真正的临床益处仍然不确定,需要通过强有力的随机对照试验来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination therapy with biologics and/or small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease: a comprehensive review.

Advanced combination treatment (ACT)-the combination of two advanced agents such as biologics or small molecules-has emerged as a promising strategy in the management of inflammatory bowel disease refractory to conventional treatment, with severe extraintestinal manifestations, or with coexisting immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. ACT including complementary mechanisms of action aims to overcome the therapeutic ceiling observed with monotherapy. Its rationale is supported by preclinical and mechanistic data demonstrating synergistic immunological effects when distinct inflammatory pathways are targeted simultaneously. Although observational studies report pooled clinical and endoscopic remission rates of approximately 60% and 30%, respectively, the quality of evidence remains very limited. Most studies are retrospective, heterogeneous in patient populations and treatment regimens, and often report outcomes in aggregate, precluding firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of specific drug combinations. The two and only randomised controlled trials available to date have shown acceptable safety profiles but limited or no clear superiority of ACT over monotherapy. Safety data are reassuring, with no significant increase in serious adverse events. The optimal duration of ACT remains uncertain; while de-escalation to monotherapy following deep remission is feasible in selected patients, relapse rates vary, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment decisions and long-term follow-up. High treatment costs also pose a barrier to widespread adoption of ACT, though biosimilars may help offset these concerns. In summary, ACT may represent a potentially valuable therapeutic option in selected high-risk or treatment-resistant patients with inflammatory bowel disease; however, its true clinical benefit remains uncertain and requires confirmation through robust, well-powered randomised controlled trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信