Geoffrey Coisnon, Céline Truong, Nicolas Pinsault, Richard Monvoisin, Pauline Girard, Léo Druart
{"title":"“安定下来,分门别类,保持方向感”。一次关于补充疗法的健康教育咨询的经验]。","authors":"Geoffrey Coisnon, Céline Truong, Nicolas Pinsault, Richard Monvoisin, Pauline Girard, Léo Druart","doi":"10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAMs) by breast cancer patients is frequent but not without risks. An open and patient-centered discussion on the subject is essential. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of breast cancer patients during a health education consultation about complementary and alternative medicine (CAMs) using a serious game.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was inspired by interpretative phenomenology. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine breast cancer patients who participated in a health education consultation on CAMs as part of a larger quantitative trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants' use of CAMs assimilated to a form of compensatory medicine in response to their perceived gaps in the conventional healthcare system. The conversation based on the serious game and the caregiver's open, non-judgmental approach fostered horizontal dialogue and critical reflection about the patients' health choices. Although participants expressed a desire for autonomy through this use, they expressed a need for support to avoid bearing the responsibility of decision-making alone. Despite these positive feedbacks, the perceived impact of the serious game intervention on their practice and decision-making was limited.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The health education consultation provided patients with a space for communication and reflection, serving as support for decision-making and enhancing their experiential knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":93917,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin du cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[\\\"Settling down, sorting, and keeping your compass\\\". Experience of a health education consultation on complementary therapies].\",\"authors\":\"Geoffrey Coisnon, Céline Truong, Nicolas Pinsault, Richard Monvoisin, Pauline Girard, Léo Druart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.06.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAMs) by breast cancer patients is frequent but not without risks. An open and patient-centered discussion on the subject is essential. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of breast cancer patients during a health education consultation about complementary and alternative medicine (CAMs) using a serious game.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was inspired by interpretative phenomenology. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine breast cancer patients who participated in a health education consultation on CAMs as part of a larger quantitative trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants' use of CAMs assimilated to a form of compensatory medicine in response to their perceived gaps in the conventional healthcare system. The conversation based on the serious game and the caregiver's open, non-judgmental approach fostered horizontal dialogue and critical reflection about the patients' health choices. Although participants expressed a desire for autonomy through this use, they expressed a need for support to avoid bearing the responsibility of decision-making alone. Despite these positive feedbacks, the perceived impact of the serious game intervention on their practice and decision-making was limited.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The health education consultation provided patients with a space for communication and reflection, serving as support for decision-making and enhancing their experiential knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin du cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin du cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.06.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin du cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2025.06.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
["Settling down, sorting, and keeping your compass". Experience of a health education consultation on complementary therapies].
Introduction: Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAMs) by breast cancer patients is frequent but not without risks. An open and patient-centered discussion on the subject is essential. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of breast cancer patients during a health education consultation about complementary and alternative medicine (CAMs) using a serious game.
Methods: This qualitative study was inspired by interpretative phenomenology. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine breast cancer patients who participated in a health education consultation on CAMs as part of a larger quantitative trial.
Results: The participants' use of CAMs assimilated to a form of compensatory medicine in response to their perceived gaps in the conventional healthcare system. The conversation based on the serious game and the caregiver's open, non-judgmental approach fostered horizontal dialogue and critical reflection about the patients' health choices. Although participants expressed a desire for autonomy through this use, they expressed a need for support to avoid bearing the responsibility of decision-making alone. Despite these positive feedbacks, the perceived impact of the serious game intervention on their practice and decision-making was limited.
Discussion: The health education consultation provided patients with a space for communication and reflection, serving as support for decision-making and enhancing their experiential knowledge.