艾伯塔省第一民族成年女性急诊室就诊情况:一项基于人口的研究。

IF 2
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00927-0
Elenna LaPlante, Rhonda J Rosychuk, Kimberley D Curtin, Cheryl Barnabe, Katherine Rittenbach, Brian R Holroyd, Lea Bill, Bonnie Healy, Eunice Louis, Patrick McLane
{"title":"艾伯塔省第一民族成年女性急诊室就诊情况:一项基于人口的研究。","authors":"Elenna LaPlante, Rhonda J Rosychuk, Kimberley D Curtin, Cheryl Barnabe, Katherine Rittenbach, Brian R Holroyd, Lea Bill, Bonnie Healy, Eunice Louis, Patrick McLane","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00927-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emergency departments (EDs) serve as a critical first access point for receiving healthcare for many First Nations members. However, ED experiences differ between First Nations and non-First Nations patients. Our objective is to quantify differences in ED visit characteristics for First Nations female and non-First Nations female adult patients in Alberta.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used healthcare administrative data from April 1, 2012 until March 31, 2017 linked to First Nations identifying data. We included all female patients aged 18-54 with ED encounters in Alberta, Canada. We extracted patient characteristics (e.g., age, gender, First Nations status) and ED visit characteristics (e.g., day of week, acuity, diagnosis, disposition). Descriptive statistics were calculated for each of the population groups (i.e., First Nations female and non-First Nations female patients). Mixed effects modeling statistical analyses were conducted to account for clustering when assessing for significant differences between population groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First Nations female patients who had ≥ 1 ED visit used the ED more compared to non-First Nations female patients (median 5, [IQR 2, 10]) vs. (median 2, [IQR 1, 4]), and a higher proportion of First Nations female visits resulted in admission (6.0% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.0001). First Nations female patients had a higher proportion of their visits diagnosed as related to unspecific findings, infection, cancer, obstetrical conditions, substance misuse/addictions, and mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest a lack of access to culturally safe primary and specialty care that would allow treatment in community and support discharge from acute care. ED providers must understand the conditions that underly First Nations women's visits to take a culturally safe approach that does not blame patients for the number or type of ED visits they require.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"716-723"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency department visits among First Nations female adults in Alberta: a population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Elenna LaPlante, Rhonda J Rosychuk, Kimberley D Curtin, Cheryl Barnabe, Katherine Rittenbach, Brian R Holroyd, Lea Bill, Bonnie Healy, Eunice Louis, Patrick McLane\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-025-00927-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emergency departments (EDs) serve as a critical first access point for receiving healthcare for many First Nations members. However, ED experiences differ between First Nations and non-First Nations patients. Our objective is to quantify differences in ED visit characteristics for First Nations female and non-First Nations female adult patients in Alberta.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used healthcare administrative data from April 1, 2012 until March 31, 2017 linked to First Nations identifying data. We included all female patients aged 18-54 with ED encounters in Alberta, Canada. We extracted patient characteristics (e.g., age, gender, First Nations status) and ED visit characteristics (e.g., day of week, acuity, diagnosis, disposition). Descriptive statistics were calculated for each of the population groups (i.e., First Nations female and non-First Nations female patients). Mixed effects modeling statistical analyses were conducted to account for clustering when assessing for significant differences between population groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First Nations female patients who had ≥ 1 ED visit used the ED more compared to non-First Nations female patients (median 5, [IQR 2, 10]) vs. (median 2, [IQR 1, 4]), and a higher proportion of First Nations female visits resulted in admission (6.0% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.0001). First Nations female patients had a higher proportion of their visits diagnosed as related to unspecific findings, infection, cancer, obstetrical conditions, substance misuse/addictions, and mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest a lack of access to culturally safe primary and specialty care that would allow treatment in community and support discharge from acute care. ED providers must understand the conditions that underly First Nations women's visits to take a culturally safe approach that does not blame patients for the number or type of ED visits they require.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"716-723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484333/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00927-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00927-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急诊科(ed)是许多第一民族成员获得医疗保健的关键的第一个接入点。然而,原住民和非原住民患者在急诊科的经历是不同的。我们的目标是量化阿尔伯塔省第一民族女性和非第一民族女性成年患者急诊科就诊特征的差异。方法:我们使用2012年4月1日至2017年3月31日与原住民识别数据相关的医疗管理数据。我们纳入了加拿大艾伯塔省所有年龄在18-54岁的ED女性患者。我们提取了患者特征(如年龄、性别、原住民身份)和急诊科就诊特征(如星期几、视力、诊断、性格)。对每个人群(即第一民族女性患者和非第一民族女性患者)进行描述性统计。在评估群体间的显著差异时,进行了混合效应建模统计分析,以解释聚类。结果:≥1次急诊科就诊的第一民族女性患者比非第一民族女性患者更多地使用急诊科(中位数为5,[IQR 2,10])和(中位数为2,[IQR 1,4]),并且更高比例的第一民族女性就诊导致入院(6.0%对4.9%,p)。结论:研究结果表明缺乏文化上安全的初级和专科护理,这些护理将允许在社区进行治疗并支持急性护理出院。急诊科医生必须了解原住民妇女就诊的基本条件,采取一种文化上安全的方法,不因患者需要的急诊科就诊次数或类型而责备患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency department visits among First Nations female adults in Alberta: a population-based study.

Objective: Emergency departments (EDs) serve as a critical first access point for receiving healthcare for many First Nations members. However, ED experiences differ between First Nations and non-First Nations patients. Our objective is to quantify differences in ED visit characteristics for First Nations female and non-First Nations female adult patients in Alberta.

Methods: We used healthcare administrative data from April 1, 2012 until March 31, 2017 linked to First Nations identifying data. We included all female patients aged 18-54 with ED encounters in Alberta, Canada. We extracted patient characteristics (e.g., age, gender, First Nations status) and ED visit characteristics (e.g., day of week, acuity, diagnosis, disposition). Descriptive statistics were calculated for each of the population groups (i.e., First Nations female and non-First Nations female patients). Mixed effects modeling statistical analyses were conducted to account for clustering when assessing for significant differences between population groups.

Results: First Nations female patients who had ≥ 1 ED visit used the ED more compared to non-First Nations female patients (median 5, [IQR 2, 10]) vs. (median 2, [IQR 1, 4]), and a higher proportion of First Nations female visits resulted in admission (6.0% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.0001). First Nations female patients had a higher proportion of their visits diagnosed as related to unspecific findings, infection, cancer, obstetrical conditions, substance misuse/addictions, and mental health.

Conclusion: Findings suggest a lack of access to culturally safe primary and specialty care that would allow treatment in community and support discharge from acute care. ED providers must understand the conditions that underly First Nations women's visits to take a culturally safe approach that does not blame patients for the number or type of ED visits they require.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信