随机试验比较催眠与标准管理在盆腔近距离治疗应用器移除过程中患者焦虑和疼痛。

IF 1.8
Lydie Lemoine, Virginie Adam, Julia Salleron, Christelle Cuisinier, July Perrin, Claire Charra Brunaud, Py Jean-François, Marie Bruand, Didier Peiffert, Rémi Etienne, Cécile Huin Schohn, Sophie Renard
{"title":"随机试验比较催眠与标准管理在盆腔近距离治疗应用器移除过程中患者焦虑和疼痛。","authors":"Lydie Lemoine, Virginie Adam, Julia Salleron, Christelle Cuisinier, July Perrin, Claire Charra Brunaud, Py Jean-François, Marie Bruand, Didier Peiffert, Rémi Etienne, Cécile Huin Schohn, Sophie Renard","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Removal of brachytherapy applicator is routinely performed under premedication including Kalinox® gas inhalation without general anesthesia. The applicator removal is nevertheless associated with discomfort, anxiety or pain. We assessed the adjunction of formal hypnosis during this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This prospective, randomized, single-center study focused on adult patients undergoing pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal. Patients were randomly assigned to (1:1): standard management including Kalinox® (control group) vs. standard management including Kalinox® accompanied by formal hypnosis (hypnosis group). The primary endpoint was anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Y-A form (state anxiety). A secondary endpoint was pain after applicator removal (numerical scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 patients (mean age, 51.9 years) were included (cervical cancer, 86.6%). Before applicator removal, mean (SD) STAI Y-A anxiety score was 45.9 (5.6) in the control group vs. 47.5 (5.9) in the hypnosis group. After applicator removal, the scores were 48.1 (4.3) versus 47.7 (4.2), respectively (p = 0.76). Pain score was not significantly different after applicator removal (p = 0.055) in the hypnosis group compared to the control group: 1.29 (1.72) versus 0.71 (1.51), respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning caregiver satisfaction with patient management (p = 0.27), ease of realization (p = 0.17) and caregiver comfort (p = 0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study failed to demonstrate a substantial benefit of formal hypnosis on anxiety in patients undergoing pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal. But this study suggests that the use of hypnotic communication techniques enables a positive attitude to patient care, thus reinforcing the patient-caregiver relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized trial comparing hypnosis versus standard management on patient anxiety and pain during pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal.\",\"authors\":\"Lydie Lemoine, Virginie Adam, Julia Salleron, Christelle Cuisinier, July Perrin, Claire Charra Brunaud, Py Jean-François, Marie Bruand, Didier Peiffert, Rémi Etienne, Cécile Huin Schohn, Sophie Renard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Removal of brachytherapy applicator is routinely performed under premedication including Kalinox® gas inhalation without general anesthesia. The applicator removal is nevertheless associated with discomfort, anxiety or pain. We assessed the adjunction of formal hypnosis during this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This prospective, randomized, single-center study focused on adult patients undergoing pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal. Patients were randomly assigned to (1:1): standard management including Kalinox® (control group) vs. standard management including Kalinox® accompanied by formal hypnosis (hypnosis group). The primary endpoint was anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Y-A form (state anxiety). A secondary endpoint was pain after applicator removal (numerical scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 patients (mean age, 51.9 years) were included (cervical cancer, 86.6%). Before applicator removal, mean (SD) STAI Y-A anxiety score was 45.9 (5.6) in the control group vs. 47.5 (5.9) in the hypnosis group. After applicator removal, the scores were 48.1 (4.3) versus 47.7 (4.2), respectively (p = 0.76). Pain score was not significantly different after applicator removal (p = 0.055) in the hypnosis group compared to the control group: 1.29 (1.72) versus 0.71 (1.51), respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning caregiver satisfaction with patient management (p = 0.27), ease of realization (p = 0.17) and caregiver comfort (p = 0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study failed to demonstrate a substantial benefit of formal hypnosis on anxiety in patients undergoing pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal. But this study suggests that the use of hypnotic communication techniques enables a positive attitude to patient care, thus reinforcing the patient-caregiver relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在没有全身麻醉的情况下,在用药前包括Kalinox®气体吸入的情况下,常规地去除近距离治疗涂敷器。尽管如此,拔除涂抹器仍伴有不适、焦虑或疼痛。我们在这个过程中评估了正式催眠的附加性。方法和材料:这项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究的重点是接受盆腔近距离治疗的成年患者。患者被随机分配到(1:1):标准管理包括Kalinox®(对照组)与标准管理包括Kalinox®伴正式催眠(催眠组)。主要终点是焦虑,使用状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI) Y-A表格(状态焦虑)。次要终点是去除涂抹器后的疼痛(数值刻度)。结果:共纳入68例患者,平均年龄51.9岁,其中宫颈癌占86.6%。去除涂抹器前,对照组的平均(SD) STAI Y-A焦虑评分为45.9(5.6),催眠组为47.5(5.9)。去除涂抹器后,评分分别为48.1(4.3)和47.7 (4.2)(p = 0.76)。催眠组与对照组相比,去除涂药器后疼痛评分无显著差异(p = 0.055):分别为1.29(1.72)和0.71(1.51)。两组护理人员对患者管理的满意度(p = 0.27)、易实现性(p = 0.17)和护理人员舒适度(p = 0.42)差异均无统计学意义。结论:本研究未能证明正式催眠对盆腔近距离放射治疗的患者的焦虑有实质性的好处。但这项研究表明,催眠沟通技术的使用使病人护理的积极态度,从而加强了病人与护理者的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized trial comparing hypnosis versus standard management on patient anxiety and pain during pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal.

Purpose: Removal of brachytherapy applicator is routinely performed under premedication including Kalinox® gas inhalation without general anesthesia. The applicator removal is nevertheless associated with discomfort, anxiety or pain. We assessed the adjunction of formal hypnosis during this procedure.

Methods and materials: This prospective, randomized, single-center study focused on adult patients undergoing pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal. Patients were randomly assigned to (1:1): standard management including Kalinox® (control group) vs. standard management including Kalinox® accompanied by formal hypnosis (hypnosis group). The primary endpoint was anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Y-A form (state anxiety). A secondary endpoint was pain after applicator removal (numerical scale).

Results: A total of 68 patients (mean age, 51.9 years) were included (cervical cancer, 86.6%). Before applicator removal, mean (SD) STAI Y-A anxiety score was 45.9 (5.6) in the control group vs. 47.5 (5.9) in the hypnosis group. After applicator removal, the scores were 48.1 (4.3) versus 47.7 (4.2), respectively (p = 0.76). Pain score was not significantly different after applicator removal (p = 0.055) in the hypnosis group compared to the control group: 1.29 (1.72) versus 0.71 (1.51), respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning caregiver satisfaction with patient management (p = 0.27), ease of realization (p = 0.17) and caregiver comfort (p = 0.42).

Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate a substantial benefit of formal hypnosis on anxiety in patients undergoing pelvic brachytherapy applicator removal. But this study suggests that the use of hypnotic communication techniques enables a positive attitude to patient care, thus reinforcing the patient-caregiver relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信