青少年特发性关节炎的种族内隐偏见、治疗建议和感知依从性。

IF 2.8 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Alisha Akinsete, Onjona B Hossain, Ilir Agalliu, Dawn M Wahezi, Ellen J Silvers, Irene Blanco, Tamar Rubinstein, Cristina Gonzalez
{"title":"青少年特发性关节炎的种族内隐偏见、治疗建议和感知依从性。","authors":"Alisha Akinsete, Onjona B Hossain, Ilir Agalliu, Dawn M Wahezi, Ellen J Silvers, Irene Blanco, Tamar Rubinstein, Cristina Gonzalez","doi":"10.1002/acr2.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Racial implicit bias may contribute to health disparities in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) outcomes by impacting provider medical decision-making. Our study assessed racial and racial-medical compliance implicit biases of an international pediatric rheumatology community and investigated whether their biases impact treatment recommendations for patients with JIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey, which included a randomized vignette describing either a White or Black patient with JIA, was sent to pediatric rheumatology providers. Participants were prompted to select the best patient management option and to complete two implicit association tests (IATs): race and race compliance. Student's t-tests or analysis of variance were used to compare IAT D-scores between or across groups; all tests were two-sided with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations for two outcomes of interest: recommendation of either adequate (methotrexate monotherapy) or aggressive (methotrexate and adalimumab combination) treatment with each IAT D-score by each vignette.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 165 pediatric rheumatologists completed the survey. Providers showed a slight pro-White bias in the race IAT (mean D-score ± SD 0.26 ± 0.5) and race-medical compliance IAT (mean D-score ± SD 0.16 ± 0.43). Although not statistically significant, a one-point increase in IAT D-scores was associated with a lower likelihood that providers would choose aggressive treatment versus adequate treatment in the Black vignette (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-1.47; P = 0.23), and a greater likelihood that providers would choose aggressive treatment in the White vignette (OR 4.07, 95% CI 0.74-22.24; P = 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implicit bias was not associated with treatment recommendations. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the impact of implicit bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":93845,"journal":{"name":"ACR open rheumatology","volume":"7 8","pages":"e70082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial Implicit Bias, Treatment Recommendations, and Perceived Compliance in the Care of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Alisha Akinsete, Onjona B Hossain, Ilir Agalliu, Dawn M Wahezi, Ellen J Silvers, Irene Blanco, Tamar Rubinstein, Cristina Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr2.70082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Racial implicit bias may contribute to health disparities in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) outcomes by impacting provider medical decision-making. Our study assessed racial and racial-medical compliance implicit biases of an international pediatric rheumatology community and investigated whether their biases impact treatment recommendations for patients with JIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey, which included a randomized vignette describing either a White or Black patient with JIA, was sent to pediatric rheumatology providers. Participants were prompted to select the best patient management option and to complete two implicit association tests (IATs): race and race compliance. Student's t-tests or analysis of variance were used to compare IAT D-scores between or across groups; all tests were two-sided with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations for two outcomes of interest: recommendation of either adequate (methotrexate monotherapy) or aggressive (methotrexate and adalimumab combination) treatment with each IAT D-score by each vignette.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 165 pediatric rheumatologists completed the survey. Providers showed a slight pro-White bias in the race IAT (mean D-score ± SD 0.26 ± 0.5) and race-medical compliance IAT (mean D-score ± SD 0.16 ± 0.43). Although not statistically significant, a one-point increase in IAT D-scores was associated with a lower likelihood that providers would choose aggressive treatment versus adequate treatment in the Black vignette (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-1.47; P = 0.23), and a greater likelihood that providers would choose aggressive treatment in the White vignette (OR 4.07, 95% CI 0.74-22.24; P = 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implicit bias was not associated with treatment recommendations. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the impact of implicit bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACR open rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"7 8\",\"pages\":\"e70082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358801/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACR open rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR open rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:种族内隐偏见可能通过影响提供者的医疗决策而导致青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)预后的健康差异。我们的研究评估了国际儿科风湿病社区的种族和种族-医疗依从性隐性偏见,并调查了他们的偏见是否影响JIA患者的治疗建议。方法:一项基于网络的调查,其中包括一个随机描述白人或黑人JIA患者的小插图,发送给儿科风湿病提供者。参与者被提示选择最佳的患者管理方案,并完成两项内隐联想测试(IATs):种族和种族依从性。使用学生t检验或方差分析来比较组间或组间的IAT d分数;所有检验均为双侧检验,P < 0.05为有统计学意义。Logistic回归模型用于检查两个相关结果的相关性:推荐充分(甲氨蝶呤单药治疗)或积极(甲氨蝶呤和阿达木单抗联合)治疗与每个小样本的每个IAT d评分。结果:总共有165名儿科风湿病学家完成了调查。提供者在种族IAT(平均D-score±SD 0.26±0.5)和种族-医疗依从性IAT(平均D-score±SD 0.16±0.43)中显示轻微的偏向白人。虽然没有统计学意义,但IAT d评分增加1分与黑色小片段中提供者选择积极治疗而不是充分治疗的可能性较低相关(优势比[OR] 0.55, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.20-1.47; P = 0.23),而白色小片段中提供者选择积极治疗的可能性较大(OR 4.07, 95% CI 0.74-22.24; P = 0.11)。结论:内隐偏倚与治疗建议无关。需要进一步的研究来更好地评估内隐偏见的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial Implicit Bias, Treatment Recommendations, and Perceived Compliance in the Care of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Objective: Racial implicit bias may contribute to health disparities in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) outcomes by impacting provider medical decision-making. Our study assessed racial and racial-medical compliance implicit biases of an international pediatric rheumatology community and investigated whether their biases impact treatment recommendations for patients with JIA.

Methods: A web-based survey, which included a randomized vignette describing either a White or Black patient with JIA, was sent to pediatric rheumatology providers. Participants were prompted to select the best patient management option and to complete two implicit association tests (IATs): race and race compliance. Student's t-tests or analysis of variance were used to compare IAT D-scores between or across groups; all tests were two-sided with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations for two outcomes of interest: recommendation of either adequate (methotrexate monotherapy) or aggressive (methotrexate and adalimumab combination) treatment with each IAT D-score by each vignette.

Results: Overall, 165 pediatric rheumatologists completed the survey. Providers showed a slight pro-White bias in the race IAT (mean D-score ± SD 0.26 ± 0.5) and race-medical compliance IAT (mean D-score ± SD 0.16 ± 0.43). Although not statistically significant, a one-point increase in IAT D-scores was associated with a lower likelihood that providers would choose aggressive treatment versus adequate treatment in the Black vignette (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-1.47; P = 0.23), and a greater likelihood that providers would choose aggressive treatment in the White vignette (OR 4.07, 95% CI 0.74-22.24; P = 0.11).

Conclusion: Implicit bias was not associated with treatment recommendations. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the impact of implicit bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信