COVID-19期间英国远程会诊:数据质量、联系和研究有效性方面的挑战。

IF 1.1
Liliana Hidalgo-Padilla, Massar Dabbous, Kristoffer Halvorsrud, Thomas Beaney, Gideon Gideon, Eoin Gogarty, Geva Greenfield, Benedict Hayhoe, Gabriele Kerr, Rosalind Raine, Nirandeep Rehill, Robert Stewart, Fiona Gaughran, Mariana Pinto da Costa
{"title":"COVID-19期间英国远程会诊:数据质量、联系和研究有效性方面的挑战。","authors":"Liliana Hidalgo-Padilla, Massar Dabbous, Kristoffer Halvorsrud, Thomas Beaney, Gideon Gideon, Eoin Gogarty, Geva Greenfield, Benedict Hayhoe, Gabriele Kerr, Rosalind Raine, Nirandeep Rehill, Robert Stewart, Fiona Gaughran, Mariana Pinto da Costa","doi":"10.2196/66672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote consultations across health care, requiring rapid adjustments in service delivery. Consequently, there is an urgent need to understand the impact of remote consultations on health pathways. This viewpoint paper explores key challenges in data sources in England that hinder research on the impact of remote consultations on health outcomes. Based on our experience conducting research on this topic, we present variations in observational study findings and their validity, considering differences in population characteristics and data sources. We provide recommendations to enhance data quality for future research, including improvements in data recording platforms and strengthened structures for linking primary and secondary care electronic health records.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e66672"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote Consultations in England During COVID-19: Challenges in Data Quality, Linkage, and Research Validity.\",\"authors\":\"Liliana Hidalgo-Padilla, Massar Dabbous, Kristoffer Halvorsrud, Thomas Beaney, Gideon Gideon, Eoin Gogarty, Geva Greenfield, Benedict Hayhoe, Gabriele Kerr, Rosalind Raine, Nirandeep Rehill, Robert Stewart, Fiona Gaughran, Mariana Pinto da Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/66672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote consultations across health care, requiring rapid adjustments in service delivery. Consequently, there is an urgent need to understand the impact of remote consultations on health pathways. This viewpoint paper explores key challenges in data sources in England that hinder research on the impact of remote consultations on health outcomes. Based on our experience conducting research on this topic, we present variations in observational study findings and their validity, considering differences in population characteristics and data sources. We provide recommendations to enhance data quality for future research, including improvements in data recording platforms and strengthened structures for linking primary and secondary care electronic health records.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online journal of public health informatics\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"e66672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367347/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online journal of public health informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/66672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of public health informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无标签:2019冠状病毒病大流行加速了整个卫生保健部门采用远程会诊,要求迅速调整服务提供方式。因此,迫切需要了解远程会诊对保健途径的影响。这篇观点论文探讨了英国数据来源中的关键挑战,这些挑战阻碍了对远程咨询对健康结果影响的研究。根据我们对这一主题进行研究的经验,考虑到人口特征和数据来源的差异,我们提出了观察性研究结果及其有效性的变化。我们为今后的研究提供了提高数据质量的建议,包括改进数据记录平台和加强连接初级和二级保健电子健康记录的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remote Consultations in England During COVID-19: Challenges in Data Quality, Linkage, and Research Validity.

Unlabelled: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote consultations across health care, requiring rapid adjustments in service delivery. Consequently, there is an urgent need to understand the impact of remote consultations on health pathways. This viewpoint paper explores key challenges in data sources in England that hinder research on the impact of remote consultations on health outcomes. Based on our experience conducting research on this topic, we present variations in observational study findings and their validity, considering differences in population characteristics and data sources. We provide recommendations to enhance data quality for future research, including improvements in data recording platforms and strengthened structures for linking primary and secondary care electronic health records.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信