与持牌心理治疗师对脑电图神经反馈应用的兴趣相关的设定因素。

Practice innovations (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1037/pri0000256
Whitney K Norris, George Pro, Ellen Shaw-Smith, Geoffrey M Curran, Martha Rojo
{"title":"与持牌心理治疗师对脑电图神经反馈应用的兴趣相关的设定因素。","authors":"Whitney K Norris, George Pro, Ellen Shaw-Smith, Geoffrey M Curran, Martha Rojo","doi":"10.1037/pri0000256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurofeedback has been utilized to treat a variety of mental health issues by influencing brainwave patterns using auditory and/or visual feedback. Despite a plethora of research, there is a significant gap regarding why neurofeedback is not more commonly utilized in mental health care practice. This study sought to address this gap by posing the question: <i>What factors are associated with psychotherapists</i>' <i>self-reported interest in adopting neurofeedback into their current practice?</i> This study utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to explore factors associated with outpatient psychotherapists' interest in implementing neurofeedback in their practices. The primary variables of interest were years in practice, cost as the main barrier to implementation, and type of practice setting. Surveys were completed online by licensed psychotherapists (<i>N</i> = 500). A logistic regression analysis found that, compared to those practicing in a solo private practice, psychotherapists practicing in community mental health clinics/agencies (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 1.77, 95% confidence interval, CI, [0.99, 3.15], <i>p</i> = .0524) and other outpatient settings (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 1.81, 95% CI [0.95, 3.44], <i>p</i> = .0708) had higher odds of being interested in neurofeedback. Finally, compared to those who did not believe that neurofeedback would be welcome in their practice setting or were unsure, those who reported believing neurofeedback would be welcome (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 3.38, 95% CI [2.18, 5.26], <i>p</i> < .0001) had much higher odds of being interested in neurofeedback. This study found that inner setting factors had the most significant association with psychotherapists' interest in implementing neurofeedback. These findings point to potential areas of focus to increase the uptake of neurofeedback in mental health care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74486,"journal":{"name":"Practice innovations (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"10 1","pages":"58-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting Factors Associated With Licensed Psychotherapists' Interest in the Implementation of Electroencephalogram Neurofeedback Into Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Whitney K Norris, George Pro, Ellen Shaw-Smith, Geoffrey M Curran, Martha Rojo\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pri0000256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neurofeedback has been utilized to treat a variety of mental health issues by influencing brainwave patterns using auditory and/or visual feedback. Despite a plethora of research, there is a significant gap regarding why neurofeedback is not more commonly utilized in mental health care practice. This study sought to address this gap by posing the question: <i>What factors are associated with psychotherapists</i>' <i>self-reported interest in adopting neurofeedback into their current practice?</i> This study utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to explore factors associated with outpatient psychotherapists' interest in implementing neurofeedback in their practices. The primary variables of interest were years in practice, cost as the main barrier to implementation, and type of practice setting. Surveys were completed online by licensed psychotherapists (<i>N</i> = 500). A logistic regression analysis found that, compared to those practicing in a solo private practice, psychotherapists practicing in community mental health clinics/agencies (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 1.77, 95% confidence interval, CI, [0.99, 3.15], <i>p</i> = .0524) and other outpatient settings (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 1.81, 95% CI [0.95, 3.44], <i>p</i> = .0708) had higher odds of being interested in neurofeedback. Finally, compared to those who did not believe that neurofeedback would be welcome in their practice setting or were unsure, those who reported believing neurofeedback would be welcome (adjusted <i>OR</i>: 3.38, 95% CI [2.18, 5.26], <i>p</i> < .0001) had much higher odds of being interested in neurofeedback. This study found that inner setting factors had the most significant association with psychotherapists' interest in implementing neurofeedback. These findings point to potential areas of focus to increase the uptake of neurofeedback in mental health care settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practice innovations (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"58-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practice innovations (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice innovations (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经反馈已经被用于治疗各种心理健康问题,通过使用听觉和/或视觉反馈来影响脑电波模式。尽管有大量的研究,关于为什么神经反馈在精神卫生保健实践中不被更普遍地利用,还有一个重大的差距。这项研究试图通过提出这样一个问题来解决这一差距:什么因素与心理治疗师自我报告的在他们目前的实践中采用神经反馈的兴趣有关?本研究利用实施研究的统一框架来探索门诊心理治疗师在实践中实施神经反馈的相关因素。感兴趣的主要变量是实践的年数,成本是实施的主要障碍,以及实践设置的类型。调查由持牌心理治疗师在线完成(N = 500)。logistic回归分析发现,与在单独私人诊所执业的心理治疗师相比,在社区心理健康诊所/机构执业的心理治疗师(调整后的OR: 1.77, 95%可信区间,CI, [0.99, 3.15], p = .0524)和其他门诊机构(调整后的OR: 1.81, 95% CI [0.95, 3.44], p = .0708)对神经反馈感兴趣的几率更高。最后,与那些不相信神经反馈在他们的实践环境中会受到欢迎或不确定的人相比,那些报告相信神经反馈会受到欢迎的人(调整or: 3.38, 95% CI [2.18, 5.26], p < 0.0001)对神经反馈感兴趣的几率要高得多。本研究发现,内部环境因素与心理治疗师实施神经反馈的兴趣有最显著的关联。这些发现指出了潜在的重点领域,以增加精神卫生保健机构对神经反馈的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Setting Factors Associated With Licensed Psychotherapists' Interest in the Implementation of Electroencephalogram Neurofeedback Into Practice.

Neurofeedback has been utilized to treat a variety of mental health issues by influencing brainwave patterns using auditory and/or visual feedback. Despite a plethora of research, there is a significant gap regarding why neurofeedback is not more commonly utilized in mental health care practice. This study sought to address this gap by posing the question: What factors are associated with psychotherapists' self-reported interest in adopting neurofeedback into their current practice? This study utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to explore factors associated with outpatient psychotherapists' interest in implementing neurofeedback in their practices. The primary variables of interest were years in practice, cost as the main barrier to implementation, and type of practice setting. Surveys were completed online by licensed psychotherapists (N = 500). A logistic regression analysis found that, compared to those practicing in a solo private practice, psychotherapists practicing in community mental health clinics/agencies (adjusted OR: 1.77, 95% confidence interval, CI, [0.99, 3.15], p = .0524) and other outpatient settings (adjusted OR: 1.81, 95% CI [0.95, 3.44], p = .0708) had higher odds of being interested in neurofeedback. Finally, compared to those who did not believe that neurofeedback would be welcome in their practice setting or were unsure, those who reported believing neurofeedback would be welcome (adjusted OR: 3.38, 95% CI [2.18, 5.26], p < .0001) had much higher odds of being interested in neurofeedback. This study found that inner setting factors had the most significant association with psychotherapists' interest in implementing neurofeedback. These findings point to potential areas of focus to increase the uptake of neurofeedback in mental health care settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信