以心血管为重点的信息传递提高流感疫苗接种率。

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-30 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2500208
Ankeet S Bhatt, Natalia C Berry, Rishi V Parikh, Zoe Ballance, Thida C Tan, Ben J Marafino, Haihong Hu, Mark Mummert, Andrew P Ambrosy, Gerardo Hernandez-Diaz, Rebecca Fitch, Svasti Patel, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Brian L Claggett, Niklas Dyrby Johansen, Alexis Jones, Ivy A Ku, Scott D Solomon, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Benjamin Z Galper, Kristine L Lee, Alan S Go
{"title":"以心血管为重点的信息传递提高流感疫苗接种率。","authors":"Ankeet S Bhatt, Natalia C Berry, Rishi V Parikh, Zoe Ballance, Thida C Tan, Ben J Marafino, Haihong Hu, Mark Mummert, Andrew P Ambrosy, Gerardo Hernandez-Diaz, Rebecca Fitch, Svasti Patel, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Brian L Claggett, Niklas Dyrby Johansen, Alexis Jones, Ivy A Ku, Scott D Solomon, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Benjamin Z Galper, Kristine L Lee, Alan S Go","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal despite strong evidence of benefit. Electronic letters emphasizing the cardiovascular benefits of vaccination increased uptake in Denmark; whether this strategy is effective in a diverse U.S. population is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, open, blinded end point trial involving a multiregional health care system, adults were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to receive cardiovascular-focused messaging versus usual care messaging to encourage influenza vaccination at two trial time points, yielding four groups, with each in receipt of either two rounds of cardiovascular-focused nudges; a cardiovascular-focused nudge followed by usual care communication; usual care communication followed by a cardiovascular-focused nudge; or two rounds of usual care communication. The primary end point was influenza vaccination receipt through January 1, 2025. Outcomes were assessed across six coprimary comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3,668,428 adults were randomly assigned across three U.S. states and Washington, DC. Participants had a mean (±SD) age of 48.36 (±18.11) years, 52.87% (n=1,939,352) were women, 10.53% (n=386,393) were Black, and 702,493 (19.15%) had cardiovascular disease. Overall vaccination rate at the end of the trial was 32.46%. Compared with participants who received two rounds of usual care communication, those receiving cardiovascular-focused messaging at any time point had similar vaccination rates (32.41% vs. 32.60%; absolute change, -0.19 percentage points; 99.2% confidence interval, -0.34 to -0.04). Time to vaccination did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large individually randomized trial embedded in routine care across a national U.S. health system, a cardiovascular-focused nudge intervention did not increase influenza vaccination rates on a background of low uptake. Nevertheless, this trial illustrates the feasibility of conducting large care-embedded trials of nudges in U.S. health systems. (Funded by Kaiser Permanente's Garfield Memorial Fund; trial registration, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06571747.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDoa2500208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular-Focused Messaging to Improve Influenza Vaccination Rates.\",\"authors\":\"Ankeet S Bhatt, Natalia C Berry, Rishi V Parikh, Zoe Ballance, Thida C Tan, Ben J Marafino, Haihong Hu, Mark Mummert, Andrew P Ambrosy, Gerardo Hernandez-Diaz, Rebecca Fitch, Svasti Patel, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Brian L Claggett, Niklas Dyrby Johansen, Alexis Jones, Ivy A Ku, Scott D Solomon, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Benjamin Z Galper, Kristine L Lee, Alan S Go\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/EVIDoa2500208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal despite strong evidence of benefit. Electronic letters emphasizing the cardiovascular benefits of vaccination increased uptake in Denmark; whether this strategy is effective in a diverse U.S. population is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, open, blinded end point trial involving a multiregional health care system, adults were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to receive cardiovascular-focused messaging versus usual care messaging to encourage influenza vaccination at two trial time points, yielding four groups, with each in receipt of either two rounds of cardiovascular-focused nudges; a cardiovascular-focused nudge followed by usual care communication; usual care communication followed by a cardiovascular-focused nudge; or two rounds of usual care communication. The primary end point was influenza vaccination receipt through January 1, 2025. Outcomes were assessed across six coprimary comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3,668,428 adults were randomly assigned across three U.S. states and Washington, DC. Participants had a mean (±SD) age of 48.36 (±18.11) years, 52.87% (n=1,939,352) were women, 10.53% (n=386,393) were Black, and 702,493 (19.15%) had cardiovascular disease. Overall vaccination rate at the end of the trial was 32.46%. Compared with participants who received two rounds of usual care communication, those receiving cardiovascular-focused messaging at any time point had similar vaccination rates (32.41% vs. 32.60%; absolute change, -0.19 percentage points; 99.2% confidence interval, -0.34 to -0.04). Time to vaccination did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large individually randomized trial embedded in routine care across a national U.S. health system, a cardiovascular-focused nudge intervention did not increase influenza vaccination rates on a background of low uptake. Nevertheless, this trial illustrates the feasibility of conducting large care-embedded trials of nudges in U.S. health systems. (Funded by Kaiser Permanente's Garfield Memorial Fund; trial registration, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06571747.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEJM evidence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"EVIDoa2500208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEJM evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2500208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2500208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有强有力的证据表明流感疫苗接种有益,但疫苗接种率仍不理想。强调疫苗接种对心血管有益的电子信件在丹麦增加了吸收率;这一策略在多样化的美国人口中是否有效还不得而知。方法:在这项涉及多地区卫生保健系统的前瞻性、随机、开放、盲法终点试验中,成年人被随机分配为1:1:1:1:1,在两个试验时间点接受以心血管为重点的信息传递与常规护理信息传递,以鼓励流感疫苗接种,共产生四组,每组接受两轮心血管为重点的轻推;以心血管为重点的轻推,然后进行常规护理沟通;常规护理沟通,然后以心血管为重点的轻推;或两轮日常护理沟通。主要终点是到2025年1月1日的流感疫苗接种收据。结果通过六个主要比较进行评估。结果:总体而言,3,668,428名成年人被随机分配到美国三个州和华盛顿特区。参与者的平均(±SD)年龄为48.36(±18.11)岁,52.87% (n=1,939,352)为女性,10.53% (n=386,393)为黑人,702,493(19.15%)患有心血管疾病。试验结束时的总接种率为32.46%。与接受两轮常规护理沟通的参与者相比,在任何时间点接受心血管信息的参与者具有相似的疫苗接种率(32.41% vs. 32.60%;绝对变化,-0.19个百分点;99.2%置信区间,-0.34至-0.04)。接种疫苗的时间没有差别。结论:在美国国家卫生系统常规护理中的一项大型个体随机试验中,以心血管为重点的轻推干预在低吸收率的背景下并没有增加流感疫苗接种率。尽管如此,这项试验说明了在美国卫生系统中进行大规模护理嵌入试验的可行性。(由Kaiser Permanente's Garfield Memorial Fund资助;试验注册,ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06571747.)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiovascular-Focused Messaging to Improve Influenza Vaccination Rates.

Background: Influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal despite strong evidence of benefit. Electronic letters emphasizing the cardiovascular benefits of vaccination increased uptake in Denmark; whether this strategy is effective in a diverse U.S. population is unknown.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, open, blinded end point trial involving a multiregional health care system, adults were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to receive cardiovascular-focused messaging versus usual care messaging to encourage influenza vaccination at two trial time points, yielding four groups, with each in receipt of either two rounds of cardiovascular-focused nudges; a cardiovascular-focused nudge followed by usual care communication; usual care communication followed by a cardiovascular-focused nudge; or two rounds of usual care communication. The primary end point was influenza vaccination receipt through January 1, 2025. Outcomes were assessed across six coprimary comparisons.

Results: Overall, 3,668,428 adults were randomly assigned across three U.S. states and Washington, DC. Participants had a mean (±SD) age of 48.36 (±18.11) years, 52.87% (n=1,939,352) were women, 10.53% (n=386,393) were Black, and 702,493 (19.15%) had cardiovascular disease. Overall vaccination rate at the end of the trial was 32.46%. Compared with participants who received two rounds of usual care communication, those receiving cardiovascular-focused messaging at any time point had similar vaccination rates (32.41% vs. 32.60%; absolute change, -0.19 percentage points; 99.2% confidence interval, -0.34 to -0.04). Time to vaccination did not differ.

Conclusions: In a large individually randomized trial embedded in routine care across a national U.S. health system, a cardiovascular-focused nudge intervention did not increase influenza vaccination rates on a background of low uptake. Nevertheless, this trial illustrates the feasibility of conducting large care-embedded trials of nudges in U.S. health systems. (Funded by Kaiser Permanente's Garfield Memorial Fund; trial registration, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06571747.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信