Katinka Wijsman, Melissa Pineda-Pinto, Simo Sarkki, Charlotte Stijnen, Janneke den Dekker-Arlain, Christopher M Raymond
{"title":"从多物种正义的角度重新思考基于自然的解决方案的权衡。","authors":"Katinka Wijsman, Melissa Pineda-Pinto, Simo Sarkki, Charlotte Stijnen, Janneke den Dekker-Arlain, Christopher M Raymond","doi":"10.1038/s42949-025-00261-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trade-offs in nature-based solutions are increasingly recognized, with novel research interrogating their justice implications. Yet, these trade-offs and justice implications remain entrenched in an anthropocentric orientation, which is problematic in ecological and ethical terms. We discuss four common assumptions on trade-offs in NBS (instrumentalism, neutrality of science, collaborative consensus, and unitemporality) and rethink them through a multispecies justice lens, maintaining that dealing with trade-offs is a form of interspecies politics.</p>","PeriodicalId":74322,"journal":{"name":"npj urban sustainability","volume":"5 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking trade-offs in nature-based solutions from a multispecies justice perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Katinka Wijsman, Melissa Pineda-Pinto, Simo Sarkki, Charlotte Stijnen, Janneke den Dekker-Arlain, Christopher M Raymond\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s42949-025-00261-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Trade-offs in nature-based solutions are increasingly recognized, with novel research interrogating their justice implications. Yet, these trade-offs and justice implications remain entrenched in an anthropocentric orientation, which is problematic in ecological and ethical terms. We discuss four common assumptions on trade-offs in NBS (instrumentalism, neutrality of science, collaborative consensus, and unitemporality) and rethink them through a multispecies justice lens, maintaining that dealing with trade-offs is a form of interspecies politics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj urban sustainability\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj urban sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00261-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj urban sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00261-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rethinking trade-offs in nature-based solutions from a multispecies justice perspective.
Trade-offs in nature-based solutions are increasingly recognized, with novel research interrogating their justice implications. Yet, these trade-offs and justice implications remain entrenched in an anthropocentric orientation, which is problematic in ecological and ethical terms. We discuss four common assumptions on trade-offs in NBS (instrumentalism, neutrality of science, collaborative consensus, and unitemporality) and rethink them through a multispecies justice lens, maintaining that dealing with trade-offs is a form of interspecies politics.