Filippo Migliorini, Luise Schäfer, Jens Schneider, Andrea Maria Nobili, Daniel Kämmer, Nicola Maffulli, Andreas Bell
{"title":"机器人辅助与徒手全膝关节置换术的围手术期比较:一项准随机对照试验。","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Luise Schäfer, Jens Schneider, Andrea Maria Nobili, Daniel Kämmer, Nicola Maffulli, Andreas Bell","doi":"10.1007/s00132-025-04709-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of navigation, followed by robotics in knee prosthetic surgery aims, among other things, to enhance the alignment of components and to improve the control of stress forces (i.e., weight, gravity, and static and dynamic stabilizers) on the bearing surface throughout the range of motion; however, the benefits of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are debated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quasi-randomized controlled trial (RCT) compares robotic-assisted and conventional TKA, focusing on surgical duration, hospital stay and serum markers. It aims to address current gaps in the literature and clarify potential advantages.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All patients who received a TKA at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery of the Eifelklinik St. Brigida in Simmerath, Germany, between 2021 and 2025 were prospectively invited to participate in the present clinical trial. All patients followed the same clinical, imaging, and anesthesiological presurgical and postsurgical pathways irrespective of their allocation. All surgeries were performed using a standard medial parapatellar approach and a functional alignment philosophy. Both groups received the same implants, and patients followed the same postoperative physiotherapy program. Deviation from the planned surgical procedure and rehabilitation protocol warranted exclusion from the study. For patients allocated to robotic-assisted TKA, the CORI system (Smith & Nephew plc, Watford, United Kingdom) was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1099 patients completed the study, 59% (649 of 1099) of the patients were women and 50% (547 of 1099) of TKAs were performed on the left side. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.2 ± 4.9 kg/m<sup>2,</sup> and the mean age was 66.9 ± 8.2 years. Comparability was found between the two cohorts regarding the number of women, side of surgery, mean BMI, age, hemoglobin, hematocrit and leucocyte count at admission. Robotic-assisted TKA was associated with a longer surgical time of 1.6 min (p = 0.04) and a lower C‑reactive protein level at both the first (p = 0.0003) and fifth (p = 0.003) postoperative days. No other difference between groups was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted TKA was associated with lower serum C‑reactive protein levels. No difference was found in the length of hospitalization and erythropoietic function in serum. Although the surgical execution of conventional TKA was statistically significantly faster, the clinical relevance of the endpoint surgical duration is negligible.</p>","PeriodicalId":74375,"journal":{"name":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative comparison between robotic-assisted and freehand total knee arthroplasty : A quasi-randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Migliorini, Luise Schäfer, Jens Schneider, Andrea Maria Nobili, Daniel Kämmer, Nicola Maffulli, Andreas Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00132-025-04709-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of navigation, followed by robotics in knee prosthetic surgery aims, among other things, to enhance the alignment of components and to improve the control of stress forces (i.e., weight, gravity, and static and dynamic stabilizers) on the bearing surface throughout the range of motion; however, the benefits of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are debated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This quasi-randomized controlled trial (RCT) compares robotic-assisted and conventional TKA, focusing on surgical duration, hospital stay and serum markers. It aims to address current gaps in the literature and clarify potential advantages.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All patients who received a TKA at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery of the Eifelklinik St. Brigida in Simmerath, Germany, between 2021 and 2025 were prospectively invited to participate in the present clinical trial. All patients followed the same clinical, imaging, and anesthesiological presurgical and postsurgical pathways irrespective of their allocation. All surgeries were performed using a standard medial parapatellar approach and a functional alignment philosophy. Both groups received the same implants, and patients followed the same postoperative physiotherapy program. Deviation from the planned surgical procedure and rehabilitation protocol warranted exclusion from the study. For patients allocated to robotic-assisted TKA, the CORI system (Smith & Nephew plc, Watford, United Kingdom) was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1099 patients completed the study, 59% (649 of 1099) of the patients were women and 50% (547 of 1099) of TKAs were performed on the left side. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.2 ± 4.9 kg/m<sup>2,</sup> and the mean age was 66.9 ± 8.2 years. Comparability was found between the two cohorts regarding the number of women, side of surgery, mean BMI, age, hemoglobin, hematocrit and leucocyte count at admission. Robotic-assisted TKA was associated with a longer surgical time of 1.6 min (p = 0.04) and a lower C‑reactive protein level at both the first (p = 0.0003) and fifth (p = 0.003) postoperative days. No other difference between groups was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted TKA was associated with lower serum C‑reactive protein levels. No difference was found in the length of hospitalization and erythropoietic function in serum. Although the surgical execution of conventional TKA was statistically significantly faster, the clinical relevance of the endpoint surgical duration is negligible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-025-04709-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-025-04709-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:膝关节假体手术中导航技术的出现,以及随后的机器人技术的出现,除其他外,旨在增强部件的对齐,并改善整个运动范围内承载面上的应力(即重量、重力、静态和动态稳定器)的控制;然而,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(TKA)的益处存在争议。目的:这项准随机对照试验(RCT)比较了机器人辅助和传统的TKA,重点是手术时间、住院时间和血清标志物。它的目的是解决目前的差距在文献和澄清潜在的优势。材料和方法:所有2021年至2025年在德国Simmerath的Eifelklinik St. Brigida骨科外科接受TKA的患者被前瞻性邀请参加本临床试验。所有患者均遵循相同的临床、影像学和麻醉的术前和术后路径,而不考虑其分配。所有手术均采用标准内侧髌旁入路和功能对齐方法进行。两组接受相同的植入物,患者接受相同的术后物理治疗方案。偏离计划的手术程序和康复方案应排除在研究之外。对于分配到机器人辅助TKA的患者,使用CORI系统(Smith & Nephew plc, Watford, United Kingdom)。结果:共1099例患者完成研究,59%(1099例中649例)为女性,50%(1099例中547例)的tka在左侧进行。平均体重指数(BMI)为30.2 ±4.9 kg/m2,平均年龄为66.9 ±8.2岁。两组患者入院时的女性人数、手术部位、平均BMI、年龄、血红蛋白、红细胞压积和白细胞计数具有可比性。机器人辅助TKA手术时间较长,为1.6 min (p = 0.04),术后第1天(p = 0.0003)和第5天(p = 0.003)C反应蛋白水平较低。两组之间没有发现其他差异。结论:机器人辅助TKA与较低的血清C反应蛋白水平相关。两组患者住院时间及血清红细胞生成功能无明显差异。虽然传统TKA的手术执行速度在统计学上明显更快,但终点手术时间的临床相关性可以忽略不计。
Perioperative comparison between robotic-assisted and freehand total knee arthroplasty : A quasi-randomized controlled trial.
Background: The advent of navigation, followed by robotics in knee prosthetic surgery aims, among other things, to enhance the alignment of components and to improve the control of stress forces (i.e., weight, gravity, and static and dynamic stabilizers) on the bearing surface throughout the range of motion; however, the benefits of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are debated.
Objective: This quasi-randomized controlled trial (RCT) compares robotic-assisted and conventional TKA, focusing on surgical duration, hospital stay and serum markers. It aims to address current gaps in the literature and clarify potential advantages.
Material and methods: All patients who received a TKA at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery of the Eifelklinik St. Brigida in Simmerath, Germany, between 2021 and 2025 were prospectively invited to participate in the present clinical trial. All patients followed the same clinical, imaging, and anesthesiological presurgical and postsurgical pathways irrespective of their allocation. All surgeries were performed using a standard medial parapatellar approach and a functional alignment philosophy. Both groups received the same implants, and patients followed the same postoperative physiotherapy program. Deviation from the planned surgical procedure and rehabilitation protocol warranted exclusion from the study. For patients allocated to robotic-assisted TKA, the CORI system (Smith & Nephew plc, Watford, United Kingdom) was used.
Results: A total of 1099 patients completed the study, 59% (649 of 1099) of the patients were women and 50% (547 of 1099) of TKAs were performed on the left side. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.2 ± 4.9 kg/m2, and the mean age was 66.9 ± 8.2 years. Comparability was found between the two cohorts regarding the number of women, side of surgery, mean BMI, age, hemoglobin, hematocrit and leucocyte count at admission. Robotic-assisted TKA was associated with a longer surgical time of 1.6 min (p = 0.04) and a lower C‑reactive protein level at both the first (p = 0.0003) and fifth (p = 0.003) postoperative days. No other difference between groups was found.
Conclusion: Robotic-assisted TKA was associated with lower serum C‑reactive protein levels. No difference was found in the length of hospitalization and erythropoietic function in serum. Although the surgical execution of conventional TKA was statistically significantly faster, the clinical relevance of the endpoint surgical duration is negligible.