拉丁美洲高成本医疗器械的创新支付机制:在该地区设计结果保护方案的经验。

Q2 Medicine
Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2025-08-04 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.3390/jmahp13030039
Daniela Paredes-Fernández, Juan Valencia-Zapata
{"title":"拉丁美洲高成本医疗器械的创新支付机制:在该地区设计结果保护方案的经验。","authors":"Daniela Paredes-Fernández, Juan Valencia-Zapata","doi":"10.3390/jmahp13030039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction and Objectives</b>: Risk-sharing agreements (RSAs) have emerged as a key strategy for financing high-cost medical technologies while ensuring financial sustainability. These payment mechanisms mitigate clinical and financial uncertainties, optimizing pricing and reimbursement decisions. Despite their widespread adoption globally, Latin America has reported limited implementation, particularly for high-cost medical devices. This study aims to share insights from designing RSAs in the form of Outcome Protection Programs (OPPs) for medical devices in Latin America from the perspective of a medical devices company. <b>Methods</b>: The report follows a structured approach, defining key OPP dimensions: payment base, access criteria, pricing schemes, risk assessment, and performance incentives. Risks were categorized as financial, clinical, and operational. The framework applied principles from prior models, emphasizing negotiation, program design, implementation, and evaluation. A multidisciplinary task force analyzed patient needs, provider motivations, and payer constraints to ensure alignment with health system priorities. <b>Results</b>: Over two semesters, a panel of seven experts from the manufacturer designed <i>n</i> = 105 innovative payment programs implemented in Argentina (<i>n</i> = 7), Brazil (<i>n</i> = 7), Colombia (<i>n</i> = 75), Mexico (<i>n</i> = 9), Panama (<i>n</i> = 4), and Puerto Rico (<i>n</i> = 3). The programs targeted eight high-burden conditions, including Coronary Artery Disease, atrial fibrillation, Heart Failure, and post-implantation arrhythmias, among others. Private providers accounted for 80% of experiences. Challenges include clinical inertia and operational complexities, necessitating structured training and monitoring mechanisms. <b>Conclusions</b>: Outcome Protection Programs offer a viable and practical risk-sharing approach to financing high-cost medical devices in Latin America. Their implementation requires careful stakeholder alignment, clear eligibility criteria and endpoints, and robust monitoring frameworks. These findings contribute to the ongoing dialogue on sustainable healthcare financing, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches in resource-constrained settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"13 3","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative Payment Mechanisms for High-Cost Medical Devices in Latin America: Experience in Designing Outcome Protection Programs in the Region.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Paredes-Fernández, Juan Valencia-Zapata\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jmahp13030039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction and Objectives</b>: Risk-sharing agreements (RSAs) have emerged as a key strategy for financing high-cost medical technologies while ensuring financial sustainability. These payment mechanisms mitigate clinical and financial uncertainties, optimizing pricing and reimbursement decisions. Despite their widespread adoption globally, Latin America has reported limited implementation, particularly for high-cost medical devices. This study aims to share insights from designing RSAs in the form of Outcome Protection Programs (OPPs) for medical devices in Latin America from the perspective of a medical devices company. <b>Methods</b>: The report follows a structured approach, defining key OPP dimensions: payment base, access criteria, pricing schemes, risk assessment, and performance incentives. Risks were categorized as financial, clinical, and operational. The framework applied principles from prior models, emphasizing negotiation, program design, implementation, and evaluation. A multidisciplinary task force analyzed patient needs, provider motivations, and payer constraints to ensure alignment with health system priorities. <b>Results</b>: Over two semesters, a panel of seven experts from the manufacturer designed <i>n</i> = 105 innovative payment programs implemented in Argentina (<i>n</i> = 7), Brazil (<i>n</i> = 7), Colombia (<i>n</i> = 75), Mexico (<i>n</i> = 9), Panama (<i>n</i> = 4), and Puerto Rico (<i>n</i> = 3). The programs targeted eight high-burden conditions, including Coronary Artery Disease, atrial fibrillation, Heart Failure, and post-implantation arrhythmias, among others. Private providers accounted for 80% of experiences. Challenges include clinical inertia and operational complexities, necessitating structured training and monitoring mechanisms. <b>Conclusions</b>: Outcome Protection Programs offer a viable and practical risk-sharing approach to financing high-cost medical devices in Latin America. Their implementation requires careful stakeholder alignment, clear eligibility criteria and endpoints, and robust monitoring frameworks. These findings contribute to the ongoing dialogue on sustainable healthcare financing, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches in resource-constrained settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372129/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp13030039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp13030039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言和目标:风险分担协议已成为为高成本医疗技术融资同时确保财务可持续性的一项关键战略。这些支付机制减轻了临床和财务的不确定性,优化了定价和报销决策。尽管它们在全球范围内得到广泛采用,但据报告,拉丁美洲的实施情况有限,特别是在高成本医疗设备方面。本研究旨在分享从拉丁美洲医疗器械公司的角度出发,以结局保护计划(opp)的形式设计rsa的见解。方法:该报告采用结构化方法,定义了关键的OPP维度:支付基础、准入标准、定价方案、风险评估和绩效激励。风险分为财务风险、临床风险和操作风险。该框架应用了先前模型的原则,强调协商、程序设计、实施和评估。一个多学科工作组分析了患者需求、提供者动机和付款人限制,以确保与卫生系统优先事项保持一致。结果:在两个学期的时间里,由制造商的七名专家组成的小组设计了n = 105个创新支付方案,分别在阿根廷(n = 7)、巴西(n = 7)、哥伦比亚(n = 75)、墨西哥(n = 9)、巴拿马(n = 4)和波多黎各(n = 3)实施。该项目针对8种高负担疾病,包括冠状动脉疾病、心房颤动、心力衰竭和植入后心律失常等。私人供应商占了80%的体验。挑战包括临床惰性和操作复杂性,需要有组织的培训和监测机制。结论:结果保护计划为拉丁美洲的高成本医疗器械融资提供了一种可行和实用的风险分担方法。它们的实现需要仔细地协调涉众、明确的资格标准和端点,以及健壮的监控框架。这些发现有助于正在进行的关于可持续卫生保健筹资的对话,强调需要在资源有限的情况下采取量身定制的办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Innovative Payment Mechanisms for High-Cost Medical Devices in Latin America: Experience in Designing Outcome Protection Programs in the Region.

Innovative Payment Mechanisms for High-Cost Medical Devices in Latin America: Experience in Designing Outcome Protection Programs in the Region.

Innovative Payment Mechanisms for High-Cost Medical Devices in Latin America: Experience in Designing Outcome Protection Programs in the Region.

Innovative Payment Mechanisms for High-Cost Medical Devices in Latin America: Experience in Designing Outcome Protection Programs in the Region.

Introduction and Objectives: Risk-sharing agreements (RSAs) have emerged as a key strategy for financing high-cost medical technologies while ensuring financial sustainability. These payment mechanisms mitigate clinical and financial uncertainties, optimizing pricing and reimbursement decisions. Despite their widespread adoption globally, Latin America has reported limited implementation, particularly for high-cost medical devices. This study aims to share insights from designing RSAs in the form of Outcome Protection Programs (OPPs) for medical devices in Latin America from the perspective of a medical devices company. Methods: The report follows a structured approach, defining key OPP dimensions: payment base, access criteria, pricing schemes, risk assessment, and performance incentives. Risks were categorized as financial, clinical, and operational. The framework applied principles from prior models, emphasizing negotiation, program design, implementation, and evaluation. A multidisciplinary task force analyzed patient needs, provider motivations, and payer constraints to ensure alignment with health system priorities. Results: Over two semesters, a panel of seven experts from the manufacturer designed n = 105 innovative payment programs implemented in Argentina (n = 7), Brazil (n = 7), Colombia (n = 75), Mexico (n = 9), Panama (n = 4), and Puerto Rico (n = 3). The programs targeted eight high-burden conditions, including Coronary Artery Disease, atrial fibrillation, Heart Failure, and post-implantation arrhythmias, among others. Private providers accounted for 80% of experiences. Challenges include clinical inertia and operational complexities, necessitating structured training and monitoring mechanisms. Conclusions: Outcome Protection Programs offer a viable and practical risk-sharing approach to financing high-cost medical devices in Latin America. Their implementation requires careful stakeholder alignment, clear eligibility criteria and endpoints, and robust monitoring frameworks. These findings contribute to the ongoing dialogue on sustainable healthcare financing, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches in resource-constrained settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信