来自双参数磁共振成像的人群特异性放射组学改善了非裔美国男性前列腺癌的风险分层。

JU open plus Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1097/ju9.0000000000000310
Abhishek Midya, Sreeharsha Tirumani, Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt, Sena Azamat, Siddharth Balakrishnan, Amogh Hiremath, Sarah Wido, Pingfu Fu, Lee Ponsky, Anant Madabhushi, Rakesh Shiradkar
{"title":"来自双参数磁共振成像的人群特异性放射组学改善了非裔美国男性前列腺癌的风险分层。","authors":"Abhishek Midya, Sreeharsha Tirumani, Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt, Sena Azamat, Siddharth Balakrishnan, Amogh Hiremath, Sarah Wido, Pingfu Fu, Lee Ponsky, Anant Madabhushi, Rakesh Shiradkar","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify population-specific differences in prostate cancer (PCa) presentation between African American (AA) and White (W) men on MRI using radiomics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified N = 149 men with PCa who underwent 3T MRI, a confirmatory biopsy and for whom self-reported race was available. Patient studies were partitioned into training (D<sub>Tr</sub>) and hold-out test set (D<sub>Te</sub>). Three hundred radiomic features quantifying textural patterns were extracted from radiologist delineated PCa regions of interest (ROI) on biparametric MRI. Features with significant differences (<i>P</i> < .05) between clinically significant (csPCa) and insignificant (ciPCa) PCa were identified. Machine learning models were trained separately for AA and W men (C<sub>AA</sub>, C<sub>W</sub>) on D<sub>Tr</sub> to distinguish csPCa and ciPCa. Validation on D<sub>Te</sub> was assessed for AUC and compared against a population agnostic model (C<sub>PA</sub>) in combination with clinical parameters (age, PSA, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Diagnostic System and tumor volume).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiomic features from PCa ROIs on biparametric MRI associated with csPCa were observed to be different in AA compared with W men, especially in the peritumoral region. Population-specific radiomic models outperformed similarly trained C<sub>PA</sub> models (AUC = 0.84, 0.57 with C<sub>AA</sub>, C<sub>PA</sub>; <i>P</i> < .05) in AA men on D<sub>Te</sub>. Similar findings were observed for W men (AUC = 0.71, 0.60 with C<sub>W</sub>, C<sub>PA</sub>; <i>P</i> < .05). Integrating clinical and radiomics further improved the risk stratification for AA men (AUC = 0.90) and W men (AUC = 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accounting for population-specific differences in radiomics may enable improved PCa risk stratification at MRI among AA men compared with a population agnostic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":"3 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population-Specific Radiomics From Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification in African American Men.\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Midya, Sreeharsha Tirumani, Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt, Sena Azamat, Siddharth Balakrishnan, Amogh Hiremath, Sarah Wido, Pingfu Fu, Lee Ponsky, Anant Madabhushi, Rakesh Shiradkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify population-specific differences in prostate cancer (PCa) presentation between African American (AA) and White (W) men on MRI using radiomics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified N = 149 men with PCa who underwent 3T MRI, a confirmatory biopsy and for whom self-reported race was available. Patient studies were partitioned into training (D<sub>Tr</sub>) and hold-out test set (D<sub>Te</sub>). Three hundred radiomic features quantifying textural patterns were extracted from radiologist delineated PCa regions of interest (ROI) on biparametric MRI. Features with significant differences (<i>P</i> < .05) between clinically significant (csPCa) and insignificant (ciPCa) PCa were identified. Machine learning models were trained separately for AA and W men (C<sub>AA</sub>, C<sub>W</sub>) on D<sub>Tr</sub> to distinguish csPCa and ciPCa. Validation on D<sub>Te</sub> was assessed for AUC and compared against a population agnostic model (C<sub>PA</sub>) in combination with clinical parameters (age, PSA, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Diagnostic System and tumor volume).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiomic features from PCa ROIs on biparametric MRI associated with csPCa were observed to be different in AA compared with W men, especially in the peritumoral region. Population-specific radiomic models outperformed similarly trained C<sub>PA</sub> models (AUC = 0.84, 0.57 with C<sub>AA</sub>, C<sub>PA</sub>; <i>P</i> < .05) in AA men on D<sub>Te</sub>. Similar findings were observed for W men (AUC = 0.71, 0.60 with C<sub>W</sub>, C<sub>PA</sub>; <i>P</i> < .05). Integrating clinical and radiomics further improved the risk stratification for AA men (AUC = 0.90) and W men (AUC = 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accounting for population-specific differences in radiomics may enable improved PCa risk stratification at MRI among AA men compared with a population agnostic approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JU open plus\",\"volume\":\"3 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377208/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JU open plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用放射组学技术量化非裔美国人(AA)和白人(W)男性在MRI上前列腺癌(PCa)表现的人群特异性差异。材料和方法:我们确定了N = 149名患有PCa的男性,他们接受了3T MRI,确认性活检,并可自我报告种族。患者研究分为训练组(DTr)和保留组(DTe)。从双参数MRI上放射科医师划定的PCa感兴趣区域(ROI)中提取300个量化纹理模式的放射学特征。临床显著性PCa (csPCa)与不显著性PCa (ciPCa)之间的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在DTr上分别训练AA和W (CAA, CW)的机器学习模型,以区分csPCa和ciPCa。评估DTe的AUC有效性,并结合临床参数(年龄、PSA、前列腺成像报告和诊断系统以及肿瘤体积)与人群不可知模型(CPA)进行比较。结果:在双参数MRI上观察到与csPCa相关的PCa ROIs放射学特征在AA与W男性中存在差异,特别是在肿瘤周围区域。在接受DTe治疗的AA男性中,人群特异性放射学模型优于类似训练的CPA模型(AUC = 0.84, CAA, CPA的AUC = 0.57; P < 0.05)。在男性中也观察到类似的结果(AUC = 0.71, 0.60, CW, CPA; P < 0.05)。结合临床和放射组学进一步改善了AA男性(AUC = 0.90)和W男性(AUC = 0.75)的风险分层。结论:与人群不可知的方法相比,考虑人群特异性的放射组学差异可以改善AA男性在MRI上的PCa风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Population-Specific Radiomics From Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification in African American Men.

Purpose: To quantify population-specific differences in prostate cancer (PCa) presentation between African American (AA) and White (W) men on MRI using radiomics.

Materials and methods: We identified N = 149 men with PCa who underwent 3T MRI, a confirmatory biopsy and for whom self-reported race was available. Patient studies were partitioned into training (DTr) and hold-out test set (DTe). Three hundred radiomic features quantifying textural patterns were extracted from radiologist delineated PCa regions of interest (ROI) on biparametric MRI. Features with significant differences (P < .05) between clinically significant (csPCa) and insignificant (ciPCa) PCa were identified. Machine learning models were trained separately for AA and W men (CAA, CW) on DTr to distinguish csPCa and ciPCa. Validation on DTe was assessed for AUC and compared against a population agnostic model (CPA) in combination with clinical parameters (age, PSA, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Diagnostic System and tumor volume).

Results: Radiomic features from PCa ROIs on biparametric MRI associated with csPCa were observed to be different in AA compared with W men, especially in the peritumoral region. Population-specific radiomic models outperformed similarly trained CPA models (AUC = 0.84, 0.57 with CAA, CPA; P < .05) in AA men on DTe. Similar findings were observed for W men (AUC = 0.71, 0.60 with CW, CPA; P < .05). Integrating clinical and radiomics further improved the risk stratification for AA men (AUC = 0.90) and W men (AUC = 0.75).

Conclusions: Accounting for population-specific differences in radiomics may enable improved PCa risk stratification at MRI among AA men compared with a population agnostic approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信