Jonathan Liu, Mohammad Daher, Noah Gilreath, Caitlin Barrett, Eric Cohen, Valentin Antoci
{"title":"粗糙与光滑钛表面金黄色葡萄球菌体外生长比较。","authors":"Jonathan Liu, Mohammad Daher, Noah Gilreath, Caitlin Barrett, Eric Cohen, Valentin Antoci","doi":"10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The textured titanium surfaces used in many total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants are designed to promote osseointegration. However, these surface types may also facilitate bacterial adherence and risk of infection. This aim of this study is to characterize the bacterial growth and viability on the different titanium surfaces used in THA implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Smooth and rough titanium samples were cleaned, sterilized, and prepared for bacterial testing. <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> cultures were applied to the samples, incubated to allow for bacterial adherence, and stained to visualize and quantify bacterial coverage using fluorescence imaging and ImageJ software. Student's <i>t</i>-test was used to compare the percentage of bacterial coverage at each timepoint between smooth and rough samples. Finally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe and compare the surface structure and bacterial adherence at a microtopographic level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microtopographic differences between surfaces showed extensive irregularities in the rough samples as compared to the uniform grooved surface of the smooth samples. Confocal imaging showed greater bacterial coverage on the rough surfaces compared to smooth ones at all timepoint including 6 hours (7.85% vs. 3.89%, <i>P</i>=0.049), 12 hours (17.68% vs. 9.54%, <i>P</i>=0.0038), and 24 hours (20.77% vs. 13.26%, <i>P</i>=0.0024). SEM images further confirmed more bacterial proliferation on rough titanium surfaces, especially at the 12-hour mark, with evidence of extra-cellular-matrix.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that rough titanium surfaces allow for greater <i>in-vitro</i> <i>S. aureus</i> growth with biofilm formation as early as 24 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":73239,"journal":{"name":"Hip & pelvis","volume":"37 3","pages":"197-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of <i>In-vitro</i> <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Growth on Rough and Smooth Titanium Surfaces.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Liu, Mohammad Daher, Noah Gilreath, Caitlin Barrett, Eric Cohen, Valentin Antoci\",\"doi\":\"10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The textured titanium surfaces used in many total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants are designed to promote osseointegration. However, these surface types may also facilitate bacterial adherence and risk of infection. This aim of this study is to characterize the bacterial growth and viability on the different titanium surfaces used in THA implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Smooth and rough titanium samples were cleaned, sterilized, and prepared for bacterial testing. <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> cultures were applied to the samples, incubated to allow for bacterial adherence, and stained to visualize and quantify bacterial coverage using fluorescence imaging and ImageJ software. Student's <i>t</i>-test was used to compare the percentage of bacterial coverage at each timepoint between smooth and rough samples. Finally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe and compare the surface structure and bacterial adherence at a microtopographic level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microtopographic differences between surfaces showed extensive irregularities in the rough samples as compared to the uniform grooved surface of the smooth samples. Confocal imaging showed greater bacterial coverage on the rough surfaces compared to smooth ones at all timepoint including 6 hours (7.85% vs. 3.89%, <i>P</i>=0.049), 12 hours (17.68% vs. 9.54%, <i>P</i>=0.0038), and 24 hours (20.77% vs. 13.26%, <i>P</i>=0.0024). SEM images further confirmed more bacterial proliferation on rough titanium surfaces, especially at the 12-hour mark, with evidence of extra-cellular-matrix.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that rough titanium surfaces allow for greater <i>in-vitro</i> <i>S. aureus</i> growth with biofilm formation as early as 24 hours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hip & pelvis\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"197-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417862/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hip & pelvis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hip & pelvis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:许多全髋关节置换术(THA)植入物中使用的纹理钛表面旨在促进骨整合。然而,这些表面类型也可能促进细菌粘附和感染的风险。本研究的目的是表征细菌在THA植入物中不同钛表面的生长和生存能力。材料和方法:将光滑和粗糙的钛样品清洗、灭菌并准备细菌检测。将金黄色葡萄球菌培养物应用于样品,孵育以允许细菌粘附,并使用荧光成像和ImageJ软件进行染色以可视化和量化细菌覆盖率。使用学生t检验比较光滑和粗糙样品在每个时间点的细菌覆盖率百分比。最后,使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)在微观形貌水平上观察和比较表面结构和细菌粘附。结果:与光滑样品的均匀沟槽表面相比,粗糙样品表面的微观形貌差异显示出广泛的不规则性。共聚焦成像显示,在6小时(7.85% vs. 3.89%, P=0.049)、12小时(17.68% vs. 9.54%, P=0.0038)和24小时(20.77% vs. 13.26%, P=0.0024),粗糙表面的细菌覆盖率均高于光滑表面。扫描电镜图像进一步证实,在粗糙的钛表面有更多的细菌增殖,特别是在12小时时,有细胞外基质的证据。结论:我们的研究结果表明,粗糙的钛表面可以促进体外金黄色葡萄球菌生长,早在24小时就形成了生物膜。
A Comparison of In-vitroStaphylococcus aureus Growth on Rough and Smooth Titanium Surfaces.
Purpose: The textured titanium surfaces used in many total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants are designed to promote osseointegration. However, these surface types may also facilitate bacterial adherence and risk of infection. This aim of this study is to characterize the bacterial growth and viability on the different titanium surfaces used in THA implants.
Materials and methods: Smooth and rough titanium samples were cleaned, sterilized, and prepared for bacterial testing. Staphylococcus aureus cultures were applied to the samples, incubated to allow for bacterial adherence, and stained to visualize and quantify bacterial coverage using fluorescence imaging and ImageJ software. Student's t-test was used to compare the percentage of bacterial coverage at each timepoint between smooth and rough samples. Finally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe and compare the surface structure and bacterial adherence at a microtopographic level.
Results: Microtopographic differences between surfaces showed extensive irregularities in the rough samples as compared to the uniform grooved surface of the smooth samples. Confocal imaging showed greater bacterial coverage on the rough surfaces compared to smooth ones at all timepoint including 6 hours (7.85% vs. 3.89%, P=0.049), 12 hours (17.68% vs. 9.54%, P=0.0038), and 24 hours (20.77% vs. 13.26%, P=0.0024). SEM images further confirmed more bacterial proliferation on rough titanium surfaces, especially at the 12-hour mark, with evidence of extra-cellular-matrix.
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that rough titanium surfaces allow for greater in-vitroS. aureus growth with biofilm formation as early as 24 hours.