单纯改良止损入路或联合侧窗治疗双柱髋臼骨折。

Bhagwan Prasad Meena, Anurag Dhakar, Umesh Kumar Meena, Prateek Behera, Kanti Lal Roat
{"title":"单纯改良止损入路或联合侧窗治疗双柱髋臼骨折。","authors":"Bhagwan Prasad Meena, Anurag Dhakar, Umesh Kumar Meena, Prateek Behera, Kanti Lal Roat","doi":"10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Complex acetabular fractures involving both columns often require two approaches, one anterior and other posterior, for adequate reduction and fixation. Treatment of such fractures using modified Stoppa approach (MSA) either alone or in combination with lateral window of the ilio-inguinal approach has been reported. Whether this line of management is appropriate or not is a matter of further investigation. This study presents the clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular both-column fractures using this approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-one patients treated with MSA for anterior column with posterior hemi transverse (AC with PHT), associated both columns, T-type, and transverse fractures were postoperatively assessed at a minimum of one year. Their immediate postoperative reduction quality, as well as the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes at the most recent follow-up visit were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients were young males injured in motor vehicle accidents who underwent surgery after a mean delay of 4.8 days. The mean surgical time was 122.44 minutes, and mean blood loss was 413.41 mL. AC with PHT fracture was the most common. In 78.0% of cases, anatomical reduction was achieved. At one year, excellent radiologic, clinical, and functional outcomes were observed in 78.0%, 51.2%, and 73.2% patients, respectively. There were eight cases with major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the MSA with satisfactory short-term results, it was possible to address acetabular fractures involving both the anterior and posterior elements in a select group of patients. A pelvi-acetabular surgeon should have expertise in using multiple surgical approaches including the MSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":73239,"journal":{"name":"Hip & pelvis","volume":"37 3","pages":"230-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified Stoppa Approach Alone or in Combination with a Lateral Window for Acetabular Fractures Involving Both Columns.\",\"authors\":\"Bhagwan Prasad Meena, Anurag Dhakar, Umesh Kumar Meena, Prateek Behera, Kanti Lal Roat\",\"doi\":\"10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Complex acetabular fractures involving both columns often require two approaches, one anterior and other posterior, for adequate reduction and fixation. Treatment of such fractures using modified Stoppa approach (MSA) either alone or in combination with lateral window of the ilio-inguinal approach has been reported. Whether this line of management is appropriate or not is a matter of further investigation. This study presents the clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular both-column fractures using this approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-one patients treated with MSA for anterior column with posterior hemi transverse (AC with PHT), associated both columns, T-type, and transverse fractures were postoperatively assessed at a minimum of one year. Their immediate postoperative reduction quality, as well as the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes at the most recent follow-up visit were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients were young males injured in motor vehicle accidents who underwent surgery after a mean delay of 4.8 days. The mean surgical time was 122.44 minutes, and mean blood loss was 413.41 mL. AC with PHT fracture was the most common. In 78.0% of cases, anatomical reduction was achieved. At one year, excellent radiologic, clinical, and functional outcomes were observed in 78.0%, 51.2%, and 73.2% patients, respectively. There were eight cases with major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the MSA with satisfactory short-term results, it was possible to address acetabular fractures involving both the anterior and posterior elements in a select group of patients. A pelvi-acetabular surgeon should have expertise in using multiple surgical approaches including the MSA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hip & pelvis\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"230-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hip & pelvis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hip & pelvis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2025.37.3.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:涉及双柱的复杂髋臼骨折通常需要两种入路,一种是前路,另一种是后路,以获得足够的复位和固定。已有报道使用改良的Stoppa入路(MSA)单独或联合髂-腹股沟侧窗入路治疗此类骨折。这种管理方式是否合适,还有待进一步调查。本研究介绍了采用该入路治疗髋臼双柱骨折的临床和影像学结果。材料和方法:41例接受MSA治疗的前柱合并后半横(AC合并PHT),相关的两柱、t型和横骨折至少在术后一年进行评估。我们回顾了他们术后立即复位的质量,以及最近随访时的临床、放射学和功能结果。结果:大多数患者为年轻男性,在机动车事故中受伤,平均延迟4.8天接受手术。平均手术时间122.44分钟,平均失血量413.41 mL。AC合并PHT骨折最常见。78.0%的病例实现了解剖复位。一年后,78.0%、51.2%和73.2%的患者分别观察到良好的放射学、临床和功能预后。有8例出现严重并发症。结论:使用MSA具有满意的短期效果,有可能在一组选定的患者中治疗髋臼前后骨折。骨盆-髋臼外科医生应具有使用包括MSA在内的多种手术入路的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modified Stoppa Approach Alone or in Combination with a Lateral Window for Acetabular Fractures Involving Both Columns.

Purpose: Complex acetabular fractures involving both columns often require two approaches, one anterior and other posterior, for adequate reduction and fixation. Treatment of such fractures using modified Stoppa approach (MSA) either alone or in combination with lateral window of the ilio-inguinal approach has been reported. Whether this line of management is appropriate or not is a matter of further investigation. This study presents the clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular both-column fractures using this approach.

Materials and methods: Forty-one patients treated with MSA for anterior column with posterior hemi transverse (AC with PHT), associated both columns, T-type, and transverse fractures were postoperatively assessed at a minimum of one year. Their immediate postoperative reduction quality, as well as the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes at the most recent follow-up visit were reviewed.

Results: Most patients were young males injured in motor vehicle accidents who underwent surgery after a mean delay of 4.8 days. The mean surgical time was 122.44 minutes, and mean blood loss was 413.41 mL. AC with PHT fracture was the most common. In 78.0% of cases, anatomical reduction was achieved. At one year, excellent radiologic, clinical, and functional outcomes were observed in 78.0%, 51.2%, and 73.2% patients, respectively. There were eight cases with major complications.

Conclusion: Using the MSA with satisfactory short-term results, it was possible to address acetabular fractures involving both the anterior and posterior elements in a select group of patients. A pelvi-acetabular surgeon should have expertise in using multiple surgical approaches including the MSA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信