评估治疗生物威胁病原体的抗生素选择。

Frontiers in antibiotics Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frabi.2025.1611588
J Matthew Meinig, Michelle Nelson, Christopher K Cote, Stevan R Emmett, Sarah V Harding
{"title":"评估治疗生物威胁病原体的抗生素选择。","authors":"J Matthew Meinig, Michelle Nelson, Christopher K Cote, Stevan R Emmett, Sarah V Harding","doi":"10.3389/frabi.2025.1611588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of medical countermeasures against pathogens of biodefense concern remains critical to protecting military and public health. This review compares data detailing antibacterial activity and efficacy for a selection of antibiotics evaluated against potential bacterial biothreat pathogens. The human safety and tolerability of these formulations were also considered. This review includes finafloxacin, levofloxacin, delafloxacin, omadacycline, gepotidacin, tebipenem and sulopenem. The selection criteria of these antibiotics were 1) the availability of an oral formulation, 2) the regulatory status (licensed by a regulatory authority or in an advanced stage of development) and 3) the availability of publicly available information on the biodefence pathogens of concern. We hope to highlight approved or advanced clinical candidates that have significant and unique potential in the biodefense space which may be deployed to protect both the public and warfighter against these bacterial infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":73065,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in antibiotics","volume":"4 ","pages":"1611588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of antibiotic options for the treatment of biothreat pathogens.\",\"authors\":\"J Matthew Meinig, Michelle Nelson, Christopher K Cote, Stevan R Emmett, Sarah V Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frabi.2025.1611588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The development of medical countermeasures against pathogens of biodefense concern remains critical to protecting military and public health. This review compares data detailing antibacterial activity and efficacy for a selection of antibiotics evaluated against potential bacterial biothreat pathogens. The human safety and tolerability of these formulations were also considered. This review includes finafloxacin, levofloxacin, delafloxacin, omadacycline, gepotidacin, tebipenem and sulopenem. The selection criteria of these antibiotics were 1) the availability of an oral formulation, 2) the regulatory status (licensed by a regulatory authority or in an advanced stage of development) and 3) the availability of publicly available information on the biodefence pathogens of concern. We hope to highlight approved or advanced clinical candidates that have significant and unique potential in the biodefense space which may be deployed to protect both the public and warfighter against these bacterial infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in antibiotics\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1611588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392784/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in antibiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frabi.2025.1611588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frabi.2025.1611588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发展针对生物防御关注病原体的医疗对策对于保护军队和公众健康仍然至关重要。这篇综述比较了数据详细抗菌活性和功效的选择抗生素评估对潜在的细菌生物威胁病原体。还考虑了这些制剂的人体安全性和耐受性。本文综述了非那沙星、左氧氟沙星、德拉沙星、奥马达环素、吉波替达星、替比培南和舒洛培南。这些抗生素的选择标准是1)口服制剂的可用性,2)监管状态(获得监管机构许可或处于开发的后期阶段)和3)有关关注的生物防御病原体的公开信息的可用性。我们希望突出在生物防御领域具有重要和独特潜力的已批准或先进的临床候选药物,这些候选药物可以用于保护公众和作战人员免受这些细菌感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of antibiotic options for the treatment of biothreat pathogens.

The development of medical countermeasures against pathogens of biodefense concern remains critical to protecting military and public health. This review compares data detailing antibacterial activity and efficacy for a selection of antibiotics evaluated against potential bacterial biothreat pathogens. The human safety and tolerability of these formulations were also considered. This review includes finafloxacin, levofloxacin, delafloxacin, omadacycline, gepotidacin, tebipenem and sulopenem. The selection criteria of these antibiotics were 1) the availability of an oral formulation, 2) the regulatory status (licensed by a regulatory authority or in an advanced stage of development) and 3) the availability of publicly available information on the biodefence pathogens of concern. We hope to highlight approved or advanced clinical candidates that have significant and unique potential in the biodefense space which may be deployed to protect both the public and warfighter against these bacterial infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信