患者对全科医生同步远程会诊的看法:一项混合方法的系统文献综述。

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gabin F Morillon, Marlène Guillon, Maude Laberge, Alphonse Sowanou, Thomas G Poder
{"title":"患者对全科医生同步远程会诊的看法:一项混合方法的系统文献综述。","authors":"Gabin F Morillon, Marlène Guillon, Maude Laberge, Alphonse Sowanou, Thomas G Poder","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02931-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Synchronous teleconsultations using video or phone have become an increasingly popular method for delivering healthcare, especially in primary care. This modality enhances access to care, particularly for individuals in remote or underserved areas, and was especially significant during disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite these benefits, patient perspectives on teleconsultations with general practitioners (GPs) remain underexplored. Factors such as consultation type, convenience, and technology influence patient satisfaction and acceptance, but concerns persist about the effectiveness of remote consultations for complex cases. This systematic review explores patients' use, attitudes, experiences, satisfaction, and preferences regarding synchronous teleconsultations with GPs, aiming to identify factors influencing the choice of teleconsultation over face-to-face consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review included 46 studies published until March 2023, sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library, following PRISMA guidelines. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies were analyzed, representing diverse contexts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings reveal that patient satisfaction with teleconsultation is influenced by consultation purpose, convenience, technological capabilities, and continuity of care. Video consultations are preferred over phone consultations, particularly for follow-ups and routine issues. Teleconsultation is seen as less effective for complex consultations requiring physical exams. Patient characteristics, including age, socioeconomic status, and technology familiarity, impact acceptance. Privacy concerns, data security, and diagnostic accuracy remain significant barriers. Continuity of care is better maintained when teleconsultation involves established patient-GP relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review emphasizes the need for hybrid care models and policies aligned with patient preferences, focusing on accessibility, technology, and privacy safeguards. Future research should address barriers for vulnerable populations and equitable access.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' perspective about synchronous teleconsultation with a general practitioner: a mixed-method systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Gabin F Morillon, Marlène Guillon, Maude Laberge, Alphonse Sowanou, Thomas G Poder\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02931-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Synchronous teleconsultations using video or phone have become an increasingly popular method for delivering healthcare, especially in primary care. This modality enhances access to care, particularly for individuals in remote or underserved areas, and was especially significant during disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite these benefits, patient perspectives on teleconsultations with general practitioners (GPs) remain underexplored. Factors such as consultation type, convenience, and technology influence patient satisfaction and acceptance, but concerns persist about the effectiveness of remote consultations for complex cases. This systematic review explores patients' use, attitudes, experiences, satisfaction, and preferences regarding synchronous teleconsultations with GPs, aiming to identify factors influencing the choice of teleconsultation over face-to-face consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review included 46 studies published until March 2023, sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library, following PRISMA guidelines. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies were analyzed, representing diverse contexts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings reveal that patient satisfaction with teleconsultation is influenced by consultation purpose, convenience, technological capabilities, and continuity of care. Video consultations are preferred over phone consultations, particularly for follow-ups and routine issues. Teleconsultation is seen as less effective for complex consultations requiring physical exams. Patient characteristics, including age, socioeconomic status, and technology familiarity, impact acceptance. Privacy concerns, data security, and diagnostic accuracy remain significant barriers. Continuity of care is better maintained when teleconsultation involves established patient-GP relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review emphasizes the need for hybrid care models and policies aligned with patient preferences, focusing on accessibility, technology, and privacy safeguards. Future research should address barriers for vulnerable populations and equitable access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02931-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02931-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用视频或电话的同步远程会诊已成为提供医疗保健的一种日益流行的方法,特别是在初级保健中。这种方式增加了获得医疗服务的机会,特别是对偏远或服务不足地区的个人而言,在COVID-19大流行等中断期间尤为重要。尽管有这些好处,但患者对全科医生远程会诊的看法仍未得到充分探讨。会诊类型、便利性和技术等因素影响患者满意度和接受度,但对复杂病例远程会诊的有效性仍然存在担忧。本系统综述探讨了患者对全科医生同步远程会诊的使用、态度、体验、满意度和偏好,旨在确定影响远程会诊选择面对面会诊的因素。方法:本综述纳入了截至2023年3月发表的46项研究,来源包括PubMed、Web of Science、EBSCO和Cochrane Library,遵循PRISMA指南。分析了代表不同背景的定量、定性和混合方法研究。结果:远程会诊患者满意度受会诊目的、便利性、技术能力和护理连续性的影响。视频咨询比电话咨询更可取,特别是对于后续行动和日常问题。远程会诊被认为对需要体检的复杂会诊效果较差。患者特征,包括年龄、社会经济地位、技术熟悉程度、影响接受度。隐私问题、数据安全性和诊断准确性仍然是主要障碍。当远程会诊涉及已建立的病人-全科医生关系时,护理的连续性可以得到更好的维持。结论:该综述强调需要与患者偏好相一致的混合护理模式和政策,重点关注可及性、技术和隐私保护。未来的研究应解决弱势群体和公平获取的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patients' perspective about synchronous teleconsultation with a general practitioner: a mixed-method systematic literature review.

Patients' perspective about synchronous teleconsultation with a general practitioner: a mixed-method systematic literature review.

Patients' perspective about synchronous teleconsultation with a general practitioner: a mixed-method systematic literature review.

Patients' perspective about synchronous teleconsultation with a general practitioner: a mixed-method systematic literature review.

Background: Synchronous teleconsultations using video or phone have become an increasingly popular method for delivering healthcare, especially in primary care. This modality enhances access to care, particularly for individuals in remote or underserved areas, and was especially significant during disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite these benefits, patient perspectives on teleconsultations with general practitioners (GPs) remain underexplored. Factors such as consultation type, convenience, and technology influence patient satisfaction and acceptance, but concerns persist about the effectiveness of remote consultations for complex cases. This systematic review explores patients' use, attitudes, experiences, satisfaction, and preferences regarding synchronous teleconsultations with GPs, aiming to identify factors influencing the choice of teleconsultation over face-to-face consultations.

Methods: The review included 46 studies published until March 2023, sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library, following PRISMA guidelines. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies were analyzed, representing diverse contexts.

Results: Findings reveal that patient satisfaction with teleconsultation is influenced by consultation purpose, convenience, technological capabilities, and continuity of care. Video consultations are preferred over phone consultations, particularly for follow-ups and routine issues. Teleconsultation is seen as less effective for complex consultations requiring physical exams. Patient characteristics, including age, socioeconomic status, and technology familiarity, impact acceptance. Privacy concerns, data security, and diagnostic accuracy remain significant barriers. Continuity of care is better maintained when teleconsultation involves established patient-GP relationships.

Conclusions: The review emphasizes the need for hybrid care models and policies aligned with patient preferences, focusing on accessibility, technology, and privacy safeguards. Future research should address barriers for vulnerable populations and equitable access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信