探索声音声学参数的一致性:跨不同录音仪器,语音样本和每日时间框架的重复测量案例研究。

IF 1.3 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Acoustics (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.3390/acoustics7010006
Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva, Adrián Castillo-Allendes, Eric James Hunter
{"title":"探索声音声学参数的一致性:跨不同录音仪器,语音样本和每日时间框架的重复测量案例研究。","authors":"Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva, Adrián Castillo-Allendes, Eric James Hunter","doi":"10.3390/acoustics7010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim was to assess the agreement between microphone-derived and neck accelerometer-derived voice acoustic parameters and their associations with recording moments and speech types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using simultaneous recordings, a 7-week study on a single individual was conducted to reduce intersubject variability. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, and associations were examined with generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman plots showed no significant bias between microphone (MIC) and accelerometer (ACC) measurements for alpha ratio, CPP, PPE, SPL SD, fundamental frequency (fo) mean, and SD. Speech type and measurement timing were significantly associated with alpha ratio, while the instrument was not. Microphone measurements resulted in slightly lower CPP compared to the accelerometer, while reading samples yielded higher CPP compared to vowel productions. PPE, SPL SD, and fo mean showed significant associations with speech type, based on univariate analysis. Microphone measurements yielded a statistically smaller fo SD compared to the accelerometer, while reading productions had a larger fo SD than vowel productions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fundamental frequency, alpha ratio, PPE, and SPL SD values were robust, regardless of the instrument used, suggesting the potential use of accelerometers in less-controlled environments. These findings are crucial for enhancing confidence in voice metrics and exploring efficient clinical assessment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":72045,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Agreement in Voice Acoustic Parameters: A Repeated Measures Case Study Across Varied Recording Instruments, Speech Samples, and Daily Timeframes.\",\"authors\":\"Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva, Adrián Castillo-Allendes, Eric James Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/acoustics7010006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim was to assess the agreement between microphone-derived and neck accelerometer-derived voice acoustic parameters and their associations with recording moments and speech types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using simultaneous recordings, a 7-week study on a single individual was conducted to reduce intersubject variability. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, and associations were examined with generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman plots showed no significant bias between microphone (MIC) and accelerometer (ACC) measurements for alpha ratio, CPP, PPE, SPL SD, fundamental frequency (fo) mean, and SD. Speech type and measurement timing were significantly associated with alpha ratio, while the instrument was not. Microphone measurements resulted in slightly lower CPP compared to the accelerometer, while reading samples yielded higher CPP compared to vowel productions. PPE, SPL SD, and fo mean showed significant associations with speech type, based on univariate analysis. Microphone measurements yielded a statistically smaller fo SD compared to the accelerometer, while reading productions had a larger fo SD than vowel productions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fundamental frequency, alpha ratio, PPE, and SPL SD values were robust, regardless of the instrument used, suggesting the potential use of accelerometers in less-controlled environments. These findings are crucial for enhancing confidence in voice metrics and exploring efficient clinical assessment protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acoustics (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366949/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acoustics (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics7010006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics7010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目的是评估麦克风衍生和颈部加速度计衍生的语音声学参数之间的一致性,以及它们与录音时刻和语音类型的关联。方法:采用同步记录,对单个个体进行为期7周的研究,以减少受试者间的可变性。使用Bland-Altman图评估一致性,并使用广义估计方程检验相关性。结果:Bland-Altman图显示,麦克风(MIC)和加速度计(ACC)测量的alpha比、CPP、PPE、SPL SD、基频(fo)平均值和SD之间没有显著偏差。语音类型和测量时间与α比显著相关,而仪器与α比无显著相关。与加速度计相比,麦克风测量产生的CPP略低,而与元音产生相比,读取样本产生的CPP更高。单变量分析显示,PPE、SPL、SD和tomean与言语类型有显著相关。与加速度计相比,麦克风测量产生的SD值在统计上更小,而读数产生的SD值比元音产生的SD值更大。结论:无论使用何种仪器,基频、α比、PPE和SPL SD值都是稳健的,这表明加速度计可能在控制较少的环境中使用。这些发现对于增强对语音指标的信心和探索有效的临床评估方案至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Agreement in Voice Acoustic Parameters: A Repeated Measures Case Study Across Varied Recording Instruments, Speech Samples, and Daily Timeframes.

Aims: The aim was to assess the agreement between microphone-derived and neck accelerometer-derived voice acoustic parameters and their associations with recording moments and speech types.

Methods: Using simultaneous recordings, a 7-week study on a single individual was conducted to reduce intersubject variability. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, and associations were examined with generalized estimating equations.

Results: Bland-Altman plots showed no significant bias between microphone (MIC) and accelerometer (ACC) measurements for alpha ratio, CPP, PPE, SPL SD, fundamental frequency (fo) mean, and SD. Speech type and measurement timing were significantly associated with alpha ratio, while the instrument was not. Microphone measurements resulted in slightly lower CPP compared to the accelerometer, while reading samples yielded higher CPP compared to vowel productions. PPE, SPL SD, and fo mean showed significant associations with speech type, based on univariate analysis. Microphone measurements yielded a statistically smaller fo SD compared to the accelerometer, while reading productions had a larger fo SD than vowel productions.

Conclusion: Fundamental frequency, alpha ratio, PPE, and SPL SD values were robust, regardless of the instrument used, suggesting the potential use of accelerometers in less-controlled environments. These findings are crucial for enhancing confidence in voice metrics and exploring efficient clinical assessment protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信