脓毒性休克患者预后的种族差异:一项国家队列研究。

Song-Peng Ang, Jia-Ee Chia, Jose Iglesias
{"title":"脓毒性休克患者预后的种族差异:一项国家队列研究。","authors":"Song-Peng Ang, Jia-Ee Chia, Jose Iglesias","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.106387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis and septic shock pose critical public health challenges with high mortality, particularly in critical care. While racial differences in sepsis incidence are documented, the impact of race on sepsis outcomes remains inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate racial disparities in clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with septic shock, focusing on in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2021. Patients diagnosed with septic shock were identified using ICD-10 code R65.21. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included trends in septic shock hospitalizations, mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3581504 hospitalizations for septic shock, the racial distribution was 67% Non-Hispanic White (NHW), 15% Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 11% Hispanic, and 7% other groups, with a mean age of 66.3 years. In-hospital mortality was 33.6%, highest among other racial groups (36.7%). Mortality was stable across racial groups from 2016-2019 but rose sharply in 2020-2021, especially among Hispanic patients. Adjusted in-hospital mortality were higher for NHB and Hispanic compared to NHW patients. NHB patients had the longest LOS, while other racial groups incurred the highest cost of hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found higher mortality among NHB, Hispanic, and other racial groups in septic shock patients, likely driven by higher risk of in-hospital complications among these racial groups. This highlights the need for future research to identify the factors contributing to the adverse outcomes in these populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 3","pages":"106387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial differences in outcomes among patients with septic shock: A national cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Song-Peng Ang, Jia-Ee Chia, Jose Iglesias\",\"doi\":\"10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.106387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis and septic shock pose critical public health challenges with high mortality, particularly in critical care. While racial differences in sepsis incidence are documented, the impact of race on sepsis outcomes remains inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate racial disparities in clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with septic shock, focusing on in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2021. Patients diagnosed with septic shock were identified using ICD-10 code R65.21. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included trends in septic shock hospitalizations, mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3581504 hospitalizations for septic shock, the racial distribution was 67% Non-Hispanic White (NHW), 15% Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 11% Hispanic, and 7% other groups, with a mean age of 66.3 years. In-hospital mortality was 33.6%, highest among other racial groups (36.7%). Mortality was stable across racial groups from 2016-2019 but rose sharply in 2020-2021, especially among Hispanic patients. Adjusted in-hospital mortality were higher for NHB and Hispanic compared to NHW patients. NHB patients had the longest LOS, while other racial groups incurred the highest cost of hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found higher mortality among NHB, Hispanic, and other racial groups in septic shock patients, likely driven by higher risk of in-hospital complications among these racial groups. This highlights the need for future research to identify the factors contributing to the adverse outcomes in these populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":66959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"106387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305100/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.106387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.106387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脓毒症和感染性休克是严重的公共卫生挑战,死亡率高,特别是在重症监护中。虽然脓毒症发病率的种族差异有文献记载,但种族对脓毒症结局的影响仍然不一致。目的:评估感染性休克住院患者临床结局的种族差异,重点关注住院死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和住院费用。方法:我们使用2016年至2021年的国家住院患者样本数据库进行回顾性队列研究。诊断为感染性休克的患者使用ICD-10代码R65.21进行识别。主要结局是住院死亡率;次要结局包括感染性休克住院趋势、死亡率、住院时间和住院费用。结果:3581504例感染性休克住院患者中,种族分布为非西班牙裔白人(NHW) 67%,非西班牙裔黑人(NHB) 15%,西班牙裔11%,其他7%,平均年龄66.3岁。住院死亡率为33.6%,在其他种族群体中最高(36.7%)。从2016年到2019年,各种族的死亡率保持稳定,但在2020年至2021年期间,死亡率急剧上升,尤其是在西班牙裔患者中。与NHW患者相比,NHB和西班牙裔患者的调整后住院死亡率更高。非裔美国人的住院时间最长,而其他种族的住院费用最高。结论:我们发现乙型肝炎、西班牙裔和其他种族的脓毒性休克患者死亡率较高,可能是由于这些种族的住院并发症风险较高。这突出了未来研究的必要性,以确定导致这些人群不良后果的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Racial differences in outcomes among patients with septic shock: A national cohort study.

Racial differences in outcomes among patients with septic shock: A national cohort study.

Racial differences in outcomes among patients with septic shock: A national cohort study.

Racial differences in outcomes among patients with septic shock: A national cohort study.

Background: Sepsis and septic shock pose critical public health challenges with high mortality, particularly in critical care. While racial differences in sepsis incidence are documented, the impact of race on sepsis outcomes remains inconsistent.

Aim: To evaluate racial disparities in clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with septic shock, focusing on in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2021. Patients diagnosed with septic shock were identified using ICD-10 code R65.21. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included trends in septic shock hospitalizations, mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalizations.

Results: Among 3581504 hospitalizations for septic shock, the racial distribution was 67% Non-Hispanic White (NHW), 15% Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 11% Hispanic, and 7% other groups, with a mean age of 66.3 years. In-hospital mortality was 33.6%, highest among other racial groups (36.7%). Mortality was stable across racial groups from 2016-2019 but rose sharply in 2020-2021, especially among Hispanic patients. Adjusted in-hospital mortality were higher for NHB and Hispanic compared to NHW patients. NHB patients had the longest LOS, while other racial groups incurred the highest cost of hospitalizations.

Conclusion: We found higher mortality among NHB, Hispanic, and other racial groups in septic shock patients, likely driven by higher risk of in-hospital complications among these racial groups. This highlights the need for future research to identify the factors contributing to the adverse outcomes in these populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信