脓毒症筛查工具、降钙素原和c反应蛋白在不明原因医院发烧中的诊断价值。

Shashikant Saini, Sapna Pahil, Ritin Mohindra, Naresh Sachdeva, Navneet Sharma, Ashok K Pannu
{"title":"脓毒症筛查工具、降钙素原和c反应蛋白在不明原因医院发烧中的诊断价值。","authors":"Shashikant Saini, Sapna Pahil, Ritin Mohindra, Naresh Sachdeva, Navneet Sharma, Ashok K Pannu","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.106496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nosocomial fever of unknown origin (nFUO) is a frequent and challenging diagnostic entity, encompassing diverse infectious and non-infectious etiologies. Timely identification is crucial, yet evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of commonly employed sepsis screening tools and biomarkers remains sparse. We hypothesized that these tools and biomarkers measured at fever onset could distinguish infectious from non-infectious causes of nFUO in critically ill adults.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic utility of sepsis tools and biomarkers in identifying infectious causes of nFUO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included patients admitted to the Acute Care Emergency Medicine Unit, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (July 2023 to December 2024). nFUO was defined by Durack and Street criteria. Diagnostic performance of sepsis screening tools (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, National Early Warning Score, and Modified Early Warning Score) and biomarkers [procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP)] at fever onset was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 80 cases (mean age 42.9 ± 16.5 years; 80% male), 42.5% had infectious causes, 38.7% non-infectious, and 18.8% remained undiagnosed. Pneumonia (26.2%) and bloodstream infections (11.2%) were the most common infectious etiologies, while central fever and thrombophlebitis (each 7.5%) were predominant among non-infectious causes. Sepsis tools showed poor diagnostic accuracy, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values close to 0.5. PCT demonstrated modest performance (AUC = 0.61; optimal cut-off: 0.85 μg/L), while CRP was paradoxically higher in non-infectious cases (AUC = 0.45). Overall mortality was 20% and was highest among undiagnosed patients (33.3%). Fever duration and hospitalization length were significantly greater in infectious cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sepsis tools, PCT, and CRP have limited utility in identifying infectious causes of nFUO in critically ill adults and should not solely guide initial decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 3","pages":"106496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic utility of sepsis screening tools, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in nosocomial fever of unknown origin.\",\"authors\":\"Shashikant Saini, Sapna Pahil, Ritin Mohindra, Naresh Sachdeva, Navneet Sharma, Ashok K Pannu\",\"doi\":\"10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.106496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nosocomial fever of unknown origin (nFUO) is a frequent and challenging diagnostic entity, encompassing diverse infectious and non-infectious etiologies. Timely identification is crucial, yet evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of commonly employed sepsis screening tools and biomarkers remains sparse. We hypothesized that these tools and biomarkers measured at fever onset could distinguish infectious from non-infectious causes of nFUO in critically ill adults.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic utility of sepsis tools and biomarkers in identifying infectious causes of nFUO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included patients admitted to the Acute Care Emergency Medicine Unit, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (July 2023 to December 2024). nFUO was defined by Durack and Street criteria. Diagnostic performance of sepsis screening tools (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, National Early Warning Score, and Modified Early Warning Score) and biomarkers [procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP)] at fever onset was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 80 cases (mean age 42.9 ± 16.5 years; 80% male), 42.5% had infectious causes, 38.7% non-infectious, and 18.8% remained undiagnosed. Pneumonia (26.2%) and bloodstream infections (11.2%) were the most common infectious etiologies, while central fever and thrombophlebitis (each 7.5%) were predominant among non-infectious causes. Sepsis tools showed poor diagnostic accuracy, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values close to 0.5. PCT demonstrated modest performance (AUC = 0.61; optimal cut-off: 0.85 μg/L), while CRP was paradoxically higher in non-infectious cases (AUC = 0.45). Overall mortality was 20% and was highest among undiagnosed patients (33.3%). Fever duration and hospitalization length were significantly greater in infectious cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sepsis tools, PCT, and CRP have limited utility in identifying infectious causes of nFUO in critically ill adults and should not solely guide initial decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":66959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"106496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305121/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.106496\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.106496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不明原因医院热(nFUO)是一种常见且具有挑战性的诊断实体,包括多种感染性和非感染性病因。及时识别是至关重要的,但关于常用的败血症筛查工具和生物标志物的诊断准确性的证据仍然很少。我们假设这些工具和在发烧时测量的生物标志物可以区分危重成人nFUO的感染性和非感染性原因。目的:评价脓毒症工具和生物标志物在确定nFUO感染原因中的诊断价值。方法:本前瞻性观察研究纳入了2023年7月至2024年12月在印度昌迪加尔医学教育与研究研究生院急症急诊医学单元住院的患者。nFUO是由Durack和Street标准定义的。采用受者工作特征曲线分析评估脓毒症筛查工具(全身炎症反应综合征、序贯器官衰竭评估、快速序贯器官衰竭评估、国家预警评分和改良预警评分)和生物标志物[降钙素原(PCT)、c反应蛋白(CRP)]在发热时的诊断性能。结果:80例患者(平均年龄42.9±16.5岁,男性占80%),感染性病因占42.5%,非感染性病因占38.7%,未确诊病例占18.8%。肺炎(26.2%)和血液感染(11.2%)是最常见的感染性病因,而中枢性发热和血栓性静脉炎(各占7.5%)在非感染性病因中占主导地位。脓毒症工具的诊断准确性较差,受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)值接近0.5。PCT表现出适度的效果(AUC = 0.61;最佳临界值:0.85 μg/L),而CRP在非感染性病例中反而更高(AUC = 0.45)。总死亡率为20%,未确诊患者的死亡率最高(33.3%)。感染病例的发热持续时间和住院时间明显大于感染病例。结论:脓毒症工具、PCT和CRP在确定危重成人nFUO感染原因方面的作用有限,不应单独指导初步决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic utility of sepsis screening tools, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in nosocomial fever of unknown origin.

Diagnostic utility of sepsis screening tools, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in nosocomial fever of unknown origin.

Diagnostic utility of sepsis screening tools, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in nosocomial fever of unknown origin.

Background: Nosocomial fever of unknown origin (nFUO) is a frequent and challenging diagnostic entity, encompassing diverse infectious and non-infectious etiologies. Timely identification is crucial, yet evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of commonly employed sepsis screening tools and biomarkers remains sparse. We hypothesized that these tools and biomarkers measured at fever onset could distinguish infectious from non-infectious causes of nFUO in critically ill adults.

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of sepsis tools and biomarkers in identifying infectious causes of nFUO.

Methods: This prospective observational study included patients admitted to the Acute Care Emergency Medicine Unit, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (July 2023 to December 2024). nFUO was defined by Durack and Street criteria. Diagnostic performance of sepsis screening tools (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, National Early Warning Score, and Modified Early Warning Score) and biomarkers [procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP)] at fever onset was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: Of 80 cases (mean age 42.9 ± 16.5 years; 80% male), 42.5% had infectious causes, 38.7% non-infectious, and 18.8% remained undiagnosed. Pneumonia (26.2%) and bloodstream infections (11.2%) were the most common infectious etiologies, while central fever and thrombophlebitis (each 7.5%) were predominant among non-infectious causes. Sepsis tools showed poor diagnostic accuracy, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values close to 0.5. PCT demonstrated modest performance (AUC = 0.61; optimal cut-off: 0.85 μg/L), while CRP was paradoxically higher in non-infectious cases (AUC = 0.45). Overall mortality was 20% and was highest among undiagnosed patients (33.3%). Fever duration and hospitalization length were significantly greater in infectious cases.

Conclusion: Sepsis tools, PCT, and CRP have limited utility in identifying infectious causes of nFUO in critically ill adults and should not solely guide initial decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信