Sengstaken-Blakemore管的减少:胃肠道出血治疗的移位实践回顾。

Gowthami Sai Kogilathota Jagirdhar, Chiamaka C Okafor, Muhammad Hussain, Praveen Reddy Elmati, Aleena Ghumman, Mehul Shah, Salim Surani
{"title":"Sengstaken-Blakemore管的减少:胃肠道出血治疗的移位实践回顾。","authors":"Gowthami Sai Kogilathota Jagirdhar, Chiamaka C Okafor, Muhammad Hussain, Praveen Reddy Elmati, Aleena Ghumman, Mehul Shah, Salim Surani","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Sengstaken-Blakemore tube (SB tube), introduced in the 1950s, was a pivotal device for managing acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, particularly from esophageal varices. This multi-lumen tube, featuring esophageal and gastric balloons, applied mechanical pressure to control bleeding and provided a temporary solution until more definitive treatments could be employed. It was historically significant in resource-limited settings where advanced endoscopic options were unavailable, enabling patient stabilization and transfer to specialized centers. However, the advent of GI endoscopy and its increased availability has rendered the SB tube obsolete. SB tubes are associated with complications, including esophageal perforation, aspiration pneumonia, and gastric ulceration. Additionally, the tube can cause significant discomfort, and its migration may lead to inadequate. Techniques such as endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic sclerotherapy offer superior precision, efficacy, and safety for managing variceal bleeding. Improved hospital transfer protocols now facilitate prompt endoscopic or surgical interventions, reducing the need for temporary measures like the SB tube. Additionally, advancements in pharmacological treatments, including vasoactive drugs, reliance on mechanical compression devices. While the SB tube remains an important historical artifact, its role in current medical practice reflecting safer and more effective treatment options in emergency GI care. This review discusses the declining role of the Sengstaken -Blakemore tube and its replacement by current intervention methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 3","pages":"101856"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decline of the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube: A review of shifting practices in gastrointestinal hemorrhage management.\",\"authors\":\"Gowthami Sai Kogilathota Jagirdhar, Chiamaka C Okafor, Muhammad Hussain, Praveen Reddy Elmati, Aleena Ghumman, Mehul Shah, Salim Surani\",\"doi\":\"10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Sengstaken-Blakemore tube (SB tube), introduced in the 1950s, was a pivotal device for managing acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, particularly from esophageal varices. This multi-lumen tube, featuring esophageal and gastric balloons, applied mechanical pressure to control bleeding and provided a temporary solution until more definitive treatments could be employed. It was historically significant in resource-limited settings where advanced endoscopic options were unavailable, enabling patient stabilization and transfer to specialized centers. However, the advent of GI endoscopy and its increased availability has rendered the SB tube obsolete. SB tubes are associated with complications, including esophageal perforation, aspiration pneumonia, and gastric ulceration. Additionally, the tube can cause significant discomfort, and its migration may lead to inadequate. Techniques such as endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic sclerotherapy offer superior precision, efficacy, and safety for managing variceal bleeding. Improved hospital transfer protocols now facilitate prompt endoscopic or surgical interventions, reducing the need for temporary measures like the SB tube. Additionally, advancements in pharmacological treatments, including vasoactive drugs, reliance on mechanical compression devices. While the SB tube remains an important historical artifact, its role in current medical practice reflecting safer and more effective treatment options in emergency GI care. This review discusses the declining role of the Sengstaken -Blakemore tube and its replacement by current intervention methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":66959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"101856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304998/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Sengstaken-Blakemore管(SB管)于20世纪50年代推出,是治疗急性胃肠道出血(GI)的关键设备,特别是食管静脉曲张。这种多腔管,以食管和胃气囊为特征,施加机械压力来控制出血,并提供临时解决方案,直到采用更明确的治疗方法。在资源有限的环境中,先进的内窥镜选择是不可用的,它具有历史意义,使患者稳定并转移到专门的中心。然而,胃肠道内窥镜的出现及其可用性的增加已经使SB管过时。SB管有并发症,包括食管穿孔、吸入性肺炎和胃溃疡。此外,输卵管会引起明显的不适,它的迁移可能会导致不足。内窥镜下静脉曲张结扎和内窥镜硬化治疗等技术为治疗静脉曲张出血提供了卓越的准确性、有效性和安全性。改进后的医院转院协议现在促进了及时的内窥镜或手术干预,减少了对SB管等临时措施的需求。此外,药物治疗的进步,包括血管活性药物,依赖于机械压迫装置。虽然SB管仍然是一个重要的历史文物,但它在当前医疗实践中的作用反映了在紧急胃肠道护理中更安全、更有效的治疗选择。这篇综述讨论了Sengstaken -Blakemore管的作用下降及其被目前的干预方法所取代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Decline of the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube: A review of shifting practices in gastrointestinal hemorrhage management.

Decline of the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube: A review of shifting practices in gastrointestinal hemorrhage management.

Decline of the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube: A review of shifting practices in gastrointestinal hemorrhage management.

The Sengstaken-Blakemore tube (SB tube), introduced in the 1950s, was a pivotal device for managing acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, particularly from esophageal varices. This multi-lumen tube, featuring esophageal and gastric balloons, applied mechanical pressure to control bleeding and provided a temporary solution until more definitive treatments could be employed. It was historically significant in resource-limited settings where advanced endoscopic options were unavailable, enabling patient stabilization and transfer to specialized centers. However, the advent of GI endoscopy and its increased availability has rendered the SB tube obsolete. SB tubes are associated with complications, including esophageal perforation, aspiration pneumonia, and gastric ulceration. Additionally, the tube can cause significant discomfort, and its migration may lead to inadequate. Techniques such as endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic sclerotherapy offer superior precision, efficacy, and safety for managing variceal bleeding. Improved hospital transfer protocols now facilitate prompt endoscopic or surgical interventions, reducing the need for temporary measures like the SB tube. Additionally, advancements in pharmacological treatments, including vasoactive drugs, reliance on mechanical compression devices. While the SB tube remains an important historical artifact, its role in current medical practice reflecting safer and more effective treatment options in emergency GI care. This review discusses the declining role of the Sengstaken -Blakemore tube and its replacement by current intervention methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信