600例药物包被球囊血管成形术的实际结果。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Marco Franchin, Maria Cristina Cervarolo, Angela Veneziano, Sophie Salvadore, Silvia Velo, Gabriele Piffaretti, Matteo Tozzi
{"title":"600例药物包被球囊血管成形术的实际结果。","authors":"Marco Franchin, Maria Cristina Cervarolo, Angela Veneziano, Sophie Salvadore, Silvia Velo, Gabriele Piffaretti, Matteo Tozzi","doi":"10.1177/11297298251362927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The principal challenge in maintaining functional vascular access for hemodialysis is managing outflow stenoses, which are primarily caused by intimal hyperplasia. These stenoses are the leading cause of access dysfunction, leading to inadequate dialysis, increased morbidity, and frequent reinterventions. While drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a promising solution by delivering antiproliferative agents to reduce restenosis rates, further clinical insights are needed to establish their role in vascular access management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzing 600 DCB angioplasties performed on 234 patients with stenoses or thromboses in arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) or vascular access grafts (AVGs). Central vein stenoses accounted for 17.5% of cases. Inclusion criteria comprised symptomatic or asymptomatic stenoses >50% detected through Doppler ultrasound. DCBs (Aperto OTW, Cardionovum GmbH, Bonn, Germany) were used following pre-dilatation. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months, with functional patency and complications as the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technical success rate was 95%, with functional patency rates of 82%, 63%, and 42%, at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Freedom from restenosis was 71% in AVFs, 64% in AVGs, and 57% in central vein stenoses at 12 months. The annual reintervention rate was 1.3 (IQR: 0.9-3.1). No major adverse events were reported, and vascular injuries occurred in 1.3% of cases. Univariate analysis revealed no significant impact of comorbidities on outcomes. Our clinical approach prioritizes DCB angioplasty as the first-line treatment, reserving stent grafts for select cases with recurrent or complex stenoses to preserve vascular anatomy and surgical options.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drug-coated balloon angioplasty is a safe and effective treatment for vascular access stenoses, demonstrating robust functional patency and low restenosis rates. Our findings support the use of paclitaxel-eluting DCBs as a cornerstone in vascular access management, emphasizing their role in reducing complications and maintaining long-term access functionality.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251362927"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world outcomes of 600 drug-coated balloon angioplasties.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Franchin, Maria Cristina Cervarolo, Angela Veneziano, Sophie Salvadore, Silvia Velo, Gabriele Piffaretti, Matteo Tozzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251362927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The principal challenge in maintaining functional vascular access for hemodialysis is managing outflow stenoses, which are primarily caused by intimal hyperplasia. These stenoses are the leading cause of access dysfunction, leading to inadequate dialysis, increased morbidity, and frequent reinterventions. While drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a promising solution by delivering antiproliferative agents to reduce restenosis rates, further clinical insights are needed to establish their role in vascular access management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzing 600 DCB angioplasties performed on 234 patients with stenoses or thromboses in arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) or vascular access grafts (AVGs). Central vein stenoses accounted for 17.5% of cases. Inclusion criteria comprised symptomatic or asymptomatic stenoses >50% detected through Doppler ultrasound. DCBs (Aperto OTW, Cardionovum GmbH, Bonn, Germany) were used following pre-dilatation. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months, with functional patency and complications as the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technical success rate was 95%, with functional patency rates of 82%, 63%, and 42%, at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Freedom from restenosis was 71% in AVFs, 64% in AVGs, and 57% in central vein stenoses at 12 months. The annual reintervention rate was 1.3 (IQR: 0.9-3.1). No major adverse events were reported, and vascular injuries occurred in 1.3% of cases. Univariate analysis revealed no significant impact of comorbidities on outcomes. Our clinical approach prioritizes DCB angioplasty as the first-line treatment, reserving stent grafts for select cases with recurrent or complex stenoses to preserve vascular anatomy and surgical options.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drug-coated balloon angioplasty is a safe and effective treatment for vascular access stenoses, demonstrating robust functional patency and low restenosis rates. Our findings support the use of paclitaxel-eluting DCBs as a cornerstone in vascular access management, emphasizing their role in reducing complications and maintaining long-term access functionality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251362927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251362927\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251362927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:维持血液透析血管功能通路的主要挑战是控制流出血管狭窄,这主要是由内膜增生引起的。这些狭窄是通道功能障碍的主要原因,导致透析不足、发病率增加和频繁的再干预。虽然药物包被气球(DCBs)已经成为一种很有前途的解决方案,通过提供抗增殖药物来降低再狭窄率,但需要进一步的临床研究来确定它们在血管通路管理中的作用。材料和方法:我们进行了一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,分析了234例动静脉瘘(AVFs)或血管通路移植物(AVGs)中狭窄或血栓形成的600例DCB血管成形术患者。中心静脉狭窄占17.5%。纳入标准包括经多普勒超声检查有症状或无症状的狭窄50%。预扩张后使用dcb (Aperto OTW, Cardionovum GmbH, Bonn, Germany)。患者随访至少6个月,以功能性通畅和并发症为主要结果。结果:12、24、36个月时,技术成功率为95%,功能通畅率分别为82%、63%、42%。12个月时,avf患者再狭窄发生率为71%,avg患者为64%,中心静脉狭窄患者为57%。年再干预率为1.3 (IQR: 0.9 ~ 3.1)。无重大不良事件报告,1.3%的病例发生血管损伤。单因素分析显示合并症对结果没有显著影响。我们的临床方法优先考虑DCB血管成形术作为一线治疗,保留支架移植用于选择复发性或复杂狭窄的病例,以保留血管解剖和手术选择。结论:药物包被球囊血管成形术是一种安全有效的治疗血管通路狭窄的方法,具有良好的功能通畅和较低的再狭窄率。我们的研究结果支持使用紫杉醇洗脱DCBs作为血管通路管理的基石,强调其在减少并发症和维持长期通路功能方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world outcomes of 600 drug-coated balloon angioplasties.

Introduction: The principal challenge in maintaining functional vascular access for hemodialysis is managing outflow stenoses, which are primarily caused by intimal hyperplasia. These stenoses are the leading cause of access dysfunction, leading to inadequate dialysis, increased morbidity, and frequent reinterventions. While drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a promising solution by delivering antiproliferative agents to reduce restenosis rates, further clinical insights are needed to establish their role in vascular access management.

Materials and methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzing 600 DCB angioplasties performed on 234 patients with stenoses or thromboses in arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) or vascular access grafts (AVGs). Central vein stenoses accounted for 17.5% of cases. Inclusion criteria comprised symptomatic or asymptomatic stenoses >50% detected through Doppler ultrasound. DCBs (Aperto OTW, Cardionovum GmbH, Bonn, Germany) were used following pre-dilatation. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months, with functional patency and complications as the primary outcomes.

Results: The technical success rate was 95%, with functional patency rates of 82%, 63%, and 42%, at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Freedom from restenosis was 71% in AVFs, 64% in AVGs, and 57% in central vein stenoses at 12 months. The annual reintervention rate was 1.3 (IQR: 0.9-3.1). No major adverse events were reported, and vascular injuries occurred in 1.3% of cases. Univariate analysis revealed no significant impact of comorbidities on outcomes. Our clinical approach prioritizes DCB angioplasty as the first-line treatment, reserving stent grafts for select cases with recurrent or complex stenoses to preserve vascular anatomy and surgical options.

Conclusion: Drug-coated balloon angioplasty is a safe and effective treatment for vascular access stenoses, demonstrating robust functional patency and low restenosis rates. Our findings support the use of paclitaxel-eluting DCBs as a cornerstone in vascular access management, emphasizing their role in reducing complications and maintaining long-term access functionality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信