Samuel T Rodriguez, Dina Sheira, Samuel Castro, Michelle Zuniga-Hernandez, Ellen Y Wang, Kyle Gardner, Mohamad Hijazi, Lucy Shang, Hannah Nguyen, Holland Stacey, Lexi Young, Charles Cocanower, Matthew Chriss, Christian Jackson, Man Yee Suen, Thomas J Caruso
{"title":"针刺过程中的振动治疗改善疼痛敏感性,同时恶化疼痛阈值:一项健康志愿者的随机交叉研究。","authors":"Samuel T Rodriguez, Dina Sheira, Samuel Castro, Michelle Zuniga-Hernandez, Ellen Y Wang, Kyle Gardner, Mohamad Hijazi, Lucy Shang, Hannah Nguyen, Holland Stacey, Lexi Young, Charles Cocanower, Matthew Chriss, Christian Jackson, Man Yee Suen, Thomas J Caruso","doi":"10.1177/11297298251366739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite advancements in pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, pain and anxiety during needle-related procedures affect most patients. Through activation of large diameter nerve fibers, vibration therapy has been proposed to alleviate pain by minimizing perception of concomitant painful stimuli. This study investigated the effectiveness of a Bluetooth-enabled haptic device (BHD) in reducing pain sensitivity and improving patient satisfaction during needle procedures. Given the frequency of vascular access procedures, from IV catheter placements to phlebotomy, improving patient experience during these encounters is essential. Non-pharmacologic tools like the BHD may enhance vascular access by improving patient cooperation and reducing procedure-related distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective crossover study conducted at an academic hospital in Northern California. Participants included healthy adults with no history of chronic pain, who underwent a series of pinprick stimuli and different vibration patterns (A, B, C, and D) applied by the BHD. The primary outcome investigated mechanical pain sensitivity, and secondary outcomes explored mechanical pain threshold and satisfaction. Mechanical pain sensitivity was assessed using numerical pain ratings, while pain threshold and satisfaction were measured through standardized thresholds and survey responses, respectively. Data were analyzed using mixed-effect linear and logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 199 participants were enrolled. All vibration patterns reduced perceived pain compared to the control condition, with Pattern D achieving the greatest reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding mechanical pain threshold, Pattern A increased the odds of pain detection (odds ratio: 1.63, <i>p</i> = 0.019), while other patterns showed no differences. Approximately 77% of participants recommended the BHD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The BHD reduced procedural pain, supporting use of vibration therapy as a non-pharmacological strategy to improve patient comfort during needle procedures. Future studies should explore vibration patterns with clinical procedures and assess the device's impact across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251366739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vibration therapy during needle procedures improves pain sensitivity while worsening pain threshold: A randomized, crossover study of healthy volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel T Rodriguez, Dina Sheira, Samuel Castro, Michelle Zuniga-Hernandez, Ellen Y Wang, Kyle Gardner, Mohamad Hijazi, Lucy Shang, Hannah Nguyen, Holland Stacey, Lexi Young, Charles Cocanower, Matthew Chriss, Christian Jackson, Man Yee Suen, Thomas J Caruso\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251366739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite advancements in pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, pain and anxiety during needle-related procedures affect most patients. Through activation of large diameter nerve fibers, vibration therapy has been proposed to alleviate pain by minimizing perception of concomitant painful stimuli. This study investigated the effectiveness of a Bluetooth-enabled haptic device (BHD) in reducing pain sensitivity and improving patient satisfaction during needle procedures. Given the frequency of vascular access procedures, from IV catheter placements to phlebotomy, improving patient experience during these encounters is essential. Non-pharmacologic tools like the BHD may enhance vascular access by improving patient cooperation and reducing procedure-related distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective crossover study conducted at an academic hospital in Northern California. Participants included healthy adults with no history of chronic pain, who underwent a series of pinprick stimuli and different vibration patterns (A, B, C, and D) applied by the BHD. The primary outcome investigated mechanical pain sensitivity, and secondary outcomes explored mechanical pain threshold and satisfaction. Mechanical pain sensitivity was assessed using numerical pain ratings, while pain threshold and satisfaction were measured through standardized thresholds and survey responses, respectively. Data were analyzed using mixed-effect linear and logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 199 participants were enrolled. All vibration patterns reduced perceived pain compared to the control condition, with Pattern D achieving the greatest reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding mechanical pain threshold, Pattern A increased the odds of pain detection (odds ratio: 1.63, <i>p</i> = 0.019), while other patterns showed no differences. Approximately 77% of participants recommended the BHD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The BHD reduced procedural pain, supporting use of vibration therapy as a non-pharmacological strategy to improve patient comfort during needle procedures. Future studies should explore vibration patterns with clinical procedures and assess the device's impact across diverse populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251366739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251366739\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251366739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:尽管在药物和非药物策略方面取得了进展,但大多数患者在针刺相关手术过程中仍感到疼痛和焦虑。通过大直径神经纤维的激活,振动疗法已被提出通过减少伴随疼痛刺激的感知来减轻疼痛。本研究调查了蓝牙触觉装置(BHD)在针刺过程中降低疼痛敏感性和提高患者满意度的有效性。考虑到从静脉置管到静脉切开术等血管进入程序的频率,改善患者在这些遭遇中的体验至关重要。像BHD这样的非药物工具可以通过改善患者的配合和减少手术相关的痛苦来增强血管通路。方法:这是一项在北加州一家学术医院进行的前瞻性交叉研究。参与者包括没有慢性疼痛史的健康成年人,他们接受了BHD施加的一系列针刺刺激和不同的振动模式(a, B, C和D)。主要结局调查机械疼痛敏感性,次要结局探讨机械疼痛阈值和满意度。机械疼痛敏感性采用数值疼痛评分进行评估,而疼痛阈值和满意度分别通过标准化阈值和调查反应进行测量。数据分析采用混合效应线性和逻辑回归模型。结果:共纳入199名受试者。与对照组相比,所有振动模式都减少了感知疼痛,其中模式D的减少幅度最大(p p = 0.019),而其他模式没有差异。大约77%的参与者推荐BHD。讨论:BHD减少了手术疼痛,支持使用振动疗法作为非药物策略来改善患者在针刺过程中的舒适度。未来的研究应该探索临床程序的振动模式,并评估该设备对不同人群的影响。
Vibration therapy during needle procedures improves pain sensitivity while worsening pain threshold: A randomized, crossover study of healthy volunteers.
Introduction: Despite advancements in pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, pain and anxiety during needle-related procedures affect most patients. Through activation of large diameter nerve fibers, vibration therapy has been proposed to alleviate pain by minimizing perception of concomitant painful stimuli. This study investigated the effectiveness of a Bluetooth-enabled haptic device (BHD) in reducing pain sensitivity and improving patient satisfaction during needle procedures. Given the frequency of vascular access procedures, from IV catheter placements to phlebotomy, improving patient experience during these encounters is essential. Non-pharmacologic tools like the BHD may enhance vascular access by improving patient cooperation and reducing procedure-related distress.
Methods: This was a prospective crossover study conducted at an academic hospital in Northern California. Participants included healthy adults with no history of chronic pain, who underwent a series of pinprick stimuli and different vibration patterns (A, B, C, and D) applied by the BHD. The primary outcome investigated mechanical pain sensitivity, and secondary outcomes explored mechanical pain threshold and satisfaction. Mechanical pain sensitivity was assessed using numerical pain ratings, while pain threshold and satisfaction were measured through standardized thresholds and survey responses, respectively. Data were analyzed using mixed-effect linear and logistic regression models.
Results: A total of 199 participants were enrolled. All vibration patterns reduced perceived pain compared to the control condition, with Pattern D achieving the greatest reduction (p < 0.001). Regarding mechanical pain threshold, Pattern A increased the odds of pain detection (odds ratio: 1.63, p = 0.019), while other patterns showed no differences. Approximately 77% of participants recommended the BHD.
Discussion: The BHD reduced procedural pain, supporting use of vibration therapy as a non-pharmacological strategy to improve patient comfort during needle procedures. Future studies should explore vibration patterns with clinical procedures and assess the device's impact across diverse populations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.