在验光师支持下,通过远程眼科对初级保健患者分诊分类的有效验证。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rafael Carrasco Solís, Mª Rosario Rodríguez Griñolo, Beatriz Ponte Zúñiga, Beatriz Mataix Albert, María Leticia Lledó de Villar, María José González Troncoso, Rocío Martínez de Pablos, Enrique Rodríguez de La Rúa Franch
{"title":"在验光师支持下,通过远程眼科对初级保健患者分诊分类的有效验证。","authors":"Rafael Carrasco Solís, Mª Rosario Rodríguez Griñolo, Beatriz Ponte Zúñiga, Beatriz Mataix Albert, María Leticia Lledó de Villar, María José González Troncoso, Rocío Martínez de Pablos, Enrique Rodríguez de La Rúa Franch","doi":"10.1177/00469580251367231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The triage classification and diagnosis of eye diseases in primary care patients through teleophthalmology were performed by ophthalmologists, optometrists, and family physicians. The agreement in <i>triage classification</i> and diagnosis between observers, as well as the quality of referrals from primary care to ophthalmology, were evaluated. Study to compare methods using a non-inferiority method approach. The sample comprised 220 patients with suspected ocular problems evaluated by family physicians. These patients were examined by an optometrist <i>(observer 1</i>) using a Visionix VX650 multi-diagnostic platform. The optometrist provided a suspected diagnosis and a referral. The tests were forwarded electronically to an ophthalmologist (observer 2), who provided a diagnosis and referral. Subsequently, they were reviewed in person by an ophthalmologist (observer 3) who provided a diagnosis and referral. The observers worked independently and at different times, without knowledge of each other's evaluations, ensuring the objectivity of the analysis. We analyzed interobserver agreement in <i>triage referrals</i> and diagnosis using the Kappa index. The <i>triage classification</i> of patients by teleophthalmology coincides with that of in-person ophthalmology in 91.2% of the cases (Kappa = 0.819). The optician's <i>triage classification</i> coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 91.3% (Kappa = 0.858) and with teleophthalmology in 92.3% (Kappa = 0.851). The diagnostic categories, teleophthalmology and in-person ophthalmology coincided in 84.61% of the cases (Kappa = 0.80). The optician coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 90.65% (Kappa = 0.88) and with teleophthalmology in 90.9% of the diagnoses (Kappa = 0.87). There was a very high level interobserver agreement for both <i>triage classification</i> and diagnostic categories. This validates our teleophthalmology approach, conducted in a primary care setting by optometrists, family physicians, and ophthalmologists, for an effective triage classification of patients referred to ophthalmology services. This t<i>elemedicine</i> also accurately categorizes patients based on their conditions, optimizing resources, reducing waiting times and waiting lists.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251367231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12391710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Validation of Primary Care Patient Triage Classification Via Tele-Ophthalmology With Optometrist Support.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Carrasco Solís, Mª Rosario Rodríguez Griñolo, Beatriz Ponte Zúñiga, Beatriz Mataix Albert, María Leticia Lledó de Villar, María José González Troncoso, Rocío Martínez de Pablos, Enrique Rodríguez de La Rúa Franch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00469580251367231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The triage classification and diagnosis of eye diseases in primary care patients through teleophthalmology were performed by ophthalmologists, optometrists, and family physicians. The agreement in <i>triage classification</i> and diagnosis between observers, as well as the quality of referrals from primary care to ophthalmology, were evaluated. Study to compare methods using a non-inferiority method approach. The sample comprised 220 patients with suspected ocular problems evaluated by family physicians. These patients were examined by an optometrist <i>(observer 1</i>) using a Visionix VX650 multi-diagnostic platform. The optometrist provided a suspected diagnosis and a referral. The tests were forwarded electronically to an ophthalmologist (observer 2), who provided a diagnosis and referral. Subsequently, they were reviewed in person by an ophthalmologist (observer 3) who provided a diagnosis and referral. The observers worked independently and at different times, without knowledge of each other's evaluations, ensuring the objectivity of the analysis. We analyzed interobserver agreement in <i>triage referrals</i> and diagnosis using the Kappa index. The <i>triage classification</i> of patients by teleophthalmology coincides with that of in-person ophthalmology in 91.2% of the cases (Kappa = 0.819). The optician's <i>triage classification</i> coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 91.3% (Kappa = 0.858) and with teleophthalmology in 92.3% (Kappa = 0.851). The diagnostic categories, teleophthalmology and in-person ophthalmology coincided in 84.61% of the cases (Kappa = 0.80). The optician coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 90.65% (Kappa = 0.88) and with teleophthalmology in 90.9% of the diagnoses (Kappa = 0.87). There was a very high level interobserver agreement for both <i>triage classification</i> and diagnostic categories. This validates our teleophthalmology approach, conducted in a primary care setting by optometrists, family physicians, and ophthalmologists, for an effective triage classification of patients referred to ophthalmology services. This t<i>elemedicine</i> also accurately categorizes patients based on their conditions, optimizing resources, reducing waiting times and waiting lists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"469580251367231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12391710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251367231\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251367231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

眼科医生、验光师和家庭医生通过远程眼科对初级保健患者的眼病进行分类和诊断。在分诊分类和诊断观察员之间的协议,以及从初级保健转介到眼科的质量,进行了评估。采用非劣效性方法进行研究比较。样本包括220名疑似眼部问题的患者,经家庭医生评估。这些患者由验光师(观察者1)使用Visionix VX650多诊断平台进行检查。验光师提供了一个可疑的诊断和转诊。检查结果以电子方式转发给一名眼科医生(观察员2),后者提供诊断和转诊。随后,他们由眼科医生(观察员3)亲自检查,并提供诊断和转诊。观察员在不同时间独立工作,不了解彼此的评价,确保了分析的客观性。我们使用Kappa指数分析了分诊转诊和诊断的观察者间协议。91.2%的远端眼科患者与现场眼科患者的分诊分类一致(Kappa = 0.819)。验光师的分诊分类与现场眼科的重合率为91.3% (Kappa = 0.858),与远程眼科的重合率为92.3% (Kappa = 0.851)。远程眼科与现场眼科的诊断类型吻合率为84.61% (Kappa = 0.80)。验光师与现场眼科诊断的符合率为90.65% (Kappa = 0.88),与远程眼科诊断的符合率为90.9% (Kappa = 0.87)。在分诊分类和诊断类别方面,观察者之间有很高的共识。这验证了我们的远程眼科方法,在初级保健环境中由验光师、家庭医生和眼科医生进行,对转介到眼科服务的患者进行有效的分类。这种远程医疗还可以根据患者的病情准确地对患者进行分类,优化资源,减少等待时间和等待名单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effective Validation of Primary Care Patient Triage Classification Via Tele-Ophthalmology With Optometrist Support.

Effective Validation of Primary Care Patient Triage Classification Via Tele-Ophthalmology With Optometrist Support.

Effective Validation of Primary Care Patient Triage Classification Via Tele-Ophthalmology With Optometrist Support.

Effective Validation of Primary Care Patient Triage Classification Via Tele-Ophthalmology With Optometrist Support.

The triage classification and diagnosis of eye diseases in primary care patients through teleophthalmology were performed by ophthalmologists, optometrists, and family physicians. The agreement in triage classification and diagnosis between observers, as well as the quality of referrals from primary care to ophthalmology, were evaluated. Study to compare methods using a non-inferiority method approach. The sample comprised 220 patients with suspected ocular problems evaluated by family physicians. These patients were examined by an optometrist (observer 1) using a Visionix VX650 multi-diagnostic platform. The optometrist provided a suspected diagnosis and a referral. The tests were forwarded electronically to an ophthalmologist (observer 2), who provided a diagnosis and referral. Subsequently, they were reviewed in person by an ophthalmologist (observer 3) who provided a diagnosis and referral. The observers worked independently and at different times, without knowledge of each other's evaluations, ensuring the objectivity of the analysis. We analyzed interobserver agreement in triage referrals and diagnosis using the Kappa index. The triage classification of patients by teleophthalmology coincides with that of in-person ophthalmology in 91.2% of the cases (Kappa = 0.819). The optician's triage classification coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 91.3% (Kappa = 0.858) and with teleophthalmology in 92.3% (Kappa = 0.851). The diagnostic categories, teleophthalmology and in-person ophthalmology coincided in 84.61% of the cases (Kappa = 0.80). The optician coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 90.65% (Kappa = 0.88) and with teleophthalmology in 90.9% of the diagnoses (Kappa = 0.87). There was a very high level interobserver agreement for both triage classification and diagnostic categories. This validates our teleophthalmology approach, conducted in a primary care setting by optometrists, family physicians, and ophthalmologists, for an effective triage classification of patients referred to ophthalmology services. This telemedicine also accurately categorizes patients based on their conditions, optimizing resources, reducing waiting times and waiting lists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信