Rafael Carrasco Solís, Mª Rosario Rodríguez Griñolo, Beatriz Ponte Zúñiga, Beatriz Mataix Albert, María Leticia Lledó de Villar, María José González Troncoso, Rocío Martínez de Pablos, Enrique Rodríguez de La Rúa Franch
{"title":"在验光师支持下,通过远程眼科对初级保健患者分诊分类的有效验证。","authors":"Rafael Carrasco Solís, Mª Rosario Rodríguez Griñolo, Beatriz Ponte Zúñiga, Beatriz Mataix Albert, María Leticia Lledó de Villar, María José González Troncoso, Rocío Martínez de Pablos, Enrique Rodríguez de La Rúa Franch","doi":"10.1177/00469580251367231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The triage classification and diagnosis of eye diseases in primary care patients through teleophthalmology were performed by ophthalmologists, optometrists, and family physicians. The agreement in <i>triage classification</i> and diagnosis between observers, as well as the quality of referrals from primary care to ophthalmology, were evaluated. Study to compare methods using a non-inferiority method approach. The sample comprised 220 patients with suspected ocular problems evaluated by family physicians. These patients were examined by an optometrist <i>(observer 1</i>) using a Visionix VX650 multi-diagnostic platform. The optometrist provided a suspected diagnosis and a referral. The tests were forwarded electronically to an ophthalmologist (observer 2), who provided a diagnosis and referral. Subsequently, they were reviewed in person by an ophthalmologist (observer 3) who provided a diagnosis and referral. The observers worked independently and at different times, without knowledge of each other's evaluations, ensuring the objectivity of the analysis. We analyzed interobserver agreement in <i>triage referrals</i> and diagnosis using the Kappa index. The <i>triage classification</i> of patients by teleophthalmology coincides with that of in-person ophthalmology in 91.2% of the cases (Kappa = 0.819). The optician's <i>triage classification</i> coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 91.3% (Kappa = 0.858) and with teleophthalmology in 92.3% (Kappa = 0.851). The diagnostic categories, teleophthalmology and in-person ophthalmology coincided in 84.61% of the cases (Kappa = 0.80). The optician coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 90.65% (Kappa = 0.88) and with teleophthalmology in 90.9% of the diagnoses (Kappa = 0.87). There was a very high level interobserver agreement for both <i>triage classification</i> and diagnostic categories. This validates our teleophthalmology approach, conducted in a primary care setting by optometrists, family physicians, and ophthalmologists, for an effective triage classification of patients referred to ophthalmology services. This t<i>elemedicine</i> also accurately categorizes patients based on their conditions, optimizing resources, reducing waiting times and waiting lists.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251367231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12391710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Validation of Primary Care Patient Triage Classification Via Tele-Ophthalmology With Optometrist Support.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Carrasco Solís, Mª Rosario Rodríguez Griñolo, Beatriz Ponte Zúñiga, Beatriz Mataix Albert, María Leticia Lledó de Villar, María José González Troncoso, Rocío Martínez de Pablos, Enrique Rodríguez de La Rúa Franch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00469580251367231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The triage classification and diagnosis of eye diseases in primary care patients through teleophthalmology were performed by ophthalmologists, optometrists, and family physicians. The agreement in <i>triage classification</i> and diagnosis between observers, as well as the quality of referrals from primary care to ophthalmology, were evaluated. Study to compare methods using a non-inferiority method approach. The sample comprised 220 patients with suspected ocular problems evaluated by family physicians. These patients were examined by an optometrist <i>(observer 1</i>) using a Visionix VX650 multi-diagnostic platform. The optometrist provided a suspected diagnosis and a referral. The tests were forwarded electronically to an ophthalmologist (observer 2), who provided a diagnosis and referral. Subsequently, they were reviewed in person by an ophthalmologist (observer 3) who provided a diagnosis and referral. The observers worked independently and at different times, without knowledge of each other's evaluations, ensuring the objectivity of the analysis. We analyzed interobserver agreement in <i>triage referrals</i> and diagnosis using the Kappa index. The <i>triage classification</i> of patients by teleophthalmology coincides with that of in-person ophthalmology in 91.2% of the cases (Kappa = 0.819). The optician's <i>triage classification</i> coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 91.3% (Kappa = 0.858) and with teleophthalmology in 92.3% (Kappa = 0.851). The diagnostic categories, teleophthalmology and in-person ophthalmology coincided in 84.61% of the cases (Kappa = 0.80). The optician coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 90.65% (Kappa = 0.88) and with teleophthalmology in 90.9% of the diagnoses (Kappa = 0.87). There was a very high level interobserver agreement for both <i>triage classification</i> and diagnostic categories. This validates our teleophthalmology approach, conducted in a primary care setting by optometrists, family physicians, and ophthalmologists, for an effective triage classification of patients referred to ophthalmology services. This t<i>elemedicine</i> also accurately categorizes patients based on their conditions, optimizing resources, reducing waiting times and waiting lists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"469580251367231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12391710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251367231\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251367231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effective Validation of Primary Care Patient Triage Classification Via Tele-Ophthalmology With Optometrist Support.
The triage classification and diagnosis of eye diseases in primary care patients through teleophthalmology were performed by ophthalmologists, optometrists, and family physicians. The agreement in triage classification and diagnosis between observers, as well as the quality of referrals from primary care to ophthalmology, were evaluated. Study to compare methods using a non-inferiority method approach. The sample comprised 220 patients with suspected ocular problems evaluated by family physicians. These patients were examined by an optometrist (observer 1) using a Visionix VX650 multi-diagnostic platform. The optometrist provided a suspected diagnosis and a referral. The tests were forwarded electronically to an ophthalmologist (observer 2), who provided a diagnosis and referral. Subsequently, they were reviewed in person by an ophthalmologist (observer 3) who provided a diagnosis and referral. The observers worked independently and at different times, without knowledge of each other's evaluations, ensuring the objectivity of the analysis. We analyzed interobserver agreement in triage referrals and diagnosis using the Kappa index. The triage classification of patients by teleophthalmology coincides with that of in-person ophthalmology in 91.2% of the cases (Kappa = 0.819). The optician's triage classification coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 91.3% (Kappa = 0.858) and with teleophthalmology in 92.3% (Kappa = 0.851). The diagnostic categories, teleophthalmology and in-person ophthalmology coincided in 84.61% of the cases (Kappa = 0.80). The optician coincided with in-person ophthalmology in 90.65% (Kappa = 0.88) and with teleophthalmology in 90.9% of the diagnoses (Kappa = 0.87). There was a very high level interobserver agreement for both triage classification and diagnostic categories. This validates our teleophthalmology approach, conducted in a primary care setting by optometrists, family physicians, and ophthalmologists, for an effective triage classification of patients referred to ophthalmology services. This telemedicine also accurately categorizes patients based on their conditions, optimizing resources, reducing waiting times and waiting lists.
期刊介绍:
INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.