妊娠早期药物流产:贫血和失血。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lucy Rose, Sarah Putnam, Eve Espey
{"title":"妊娠早期药物流产:贫血和失血。","authors":"Lucy Rose, Sarah Putnam, Eve Espey","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000001063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Although ample evidence demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of medication abortion, its safety in individuals with anemia is not well understood; modern literature describing quantitative blood loss from medication abortion is limited. As medication abortion is increasingly utilized, reviewing current guidelines and literature related to anemia and blood loss from medication abortion may help inform practice and future research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Guidelines have not established a safe minimum level of starting hemoglobin for medication abortion or a single standard for the provision of medication abortion in the setting of anemia. Studies assessing blood loss from early medication abortion report a low mean decrease in hemoglobin (0.1-0.7 g/dl); however, these studies used a variety of medication regimens, and most exclude individuals with significant anemia (hemoglobin < 9.5-10 g/dl) and gestational duration greater than 63 days.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Communities most severely impacted by abortion restrictions and bans also experience significantly higher rates of anemia. Guidelines that restrict medication abortion to patients who meet arbitrary hemoglobin cutoffs can lead to delays and barriers to care. Studies using current medication regimens and including patients with moderate-to-severe anemia and gestational duration greater than 63 days are needed to inform eligibility and safety, and support provider buy-in and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-trimester medication abortion: anemia and blood loss.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy Rose, Sarah Putnam, Eve Espey\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GCO.0000000000001063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Although ample evidence demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of medication abortion, its safety in individuals with anemia is not well understood; modern literature describing quantitative blood loss from medication abortion is limited. As medication abortion is increasingly utilized, reviewing current guidelines and literature related to anemia and blood loss from medication abortion may help inform practice and future research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Guidelines have not established a safe minimum level of starting hemoglobin for medication abortion or a single standard for the provision of medication abortion in the setting of anemia. Studies assessing blood loss from early medication abortion report a low mean decrease in hemoglobin (0.1-0.7 g/dl); however, these studies used a variety of medication regimens, and most exclude individuals with significant anemia (hemoglobin < 9.5-10 g/dl) and gestational duration greater than 63 days.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Communities most severely impacted by abortion restrictions and bans also experience significantly higher rates of anemia. Guidelines that restrict medication abortion to patients who meet arbitrary hemoglobin cutoffs can lead to delays and barriers to care. Studies using current medication regimens and including patients with moderate-to-severe anemia and gestational duration greater than 63 days are needed to inform eligibility and safety, and support provider buy-in and equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:虽然有充分的证据表明药物流产的安全性和有效性,但其在贫血患者中的安全性尚不清楚;现代文献描述定量失血药物流产是有限的。随着药物流产的应用越来越多,回顾与药物流产引起的贫血和失血相关的现行指南和文献可能有助于为实践和未来的研究提供信息。最近的发现:指南没有建立药物流产起始血红蛋白的最低安全水平,也没有在贫血情况下提供药物流产的单一标准。评估早期药物流产失血量的研究报告血红蛋白平均降低较低(0.1-0.7 g/dl);然而,这些研究使用了多种药物方案,并且大多数排除了明显贫血(血红蛋白< 9.5-10 g/dl)和妊娠期大于63天的个体。摘要:受堕胎限制和禁令影响最严重的社区贫血率也明显较高。将药物流产限制在满足任意血红蛋白临界值的患者的指导方针可能导致延误和护理障碍。需要使用目前的药物方案并纳入妊娠期大于63天的中度至重度贫血患者进行研究,以告知资格和安全性,并支持提供者的支持和公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First-trimester medication abortion: anemia and blood loss.

Purpose of review: Although ample evidence demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of medication abortion, its safety in individuals with anemia is not well understood; modern literature describing quantitative blood loss from medication abortion is limited. As medication abortion is increasingly utilized, reviewing current guidelines and literature related to anemia and blood loss from medication abortion may help inform practice and future research.

Recent findings: Guidelines have not established a safe minimum level of starting hemoglobin for medication abortion or a single standard for the provision of medication abortion in the setting of anemia. Studies assessing blood loss from early medication abortion report a low mean decrease in hemoglobin (0.1-0.7 g/dl); however, these studies used a variety of medication regimens, and most exclude individuals with significant anemia (hemoglobin < 9.5-10 g/dl) and gestational duration greater than 63 days.

Summary: Communities most severely impacted by abortion restrictions and bans also experience significantly higher rates of anemia. Guidelines that restrict medication abortion to patients who meet arbitrary hemoglobin cutoffs can lead to delays and barriers to care. Studies using current medication regimens and including patients with moderate-to-severe anemia and gestational duration greater than 63 days are needed to inform eligibility and safety, and support provider buy-in and equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信