Ellen Y Lee, Andrew W Nelson, Brandon P Sampson, Nicholas Pulos, Robert J Spinner, Alexander Y Shin
{"title":"外伤性臂丛神经损伤的成人双肩胛牵伸力和移位的比较研究。","authors":"Ellen Y Lee, Andrew W Nelson, Brandon P Sampson, Nicholas Pulos, Robert J Spinner, Alexander Y Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traditional body-powered upper limb prostheses use a Bowden cable to translate shoulder and residual upper limb movements into forces that control the terminal device. The necessary force and excursion required to use a traditional body-powered prosthesis in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) has yet to be ascertained. This study compared the force and excursion generated during biscapular protraction in adults with traumatic BPI compared to healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty nonamputee volunteers, divided into BPI and uninjured control groups and matched for age and sex, were recruited, consented, and comprised the study's cohort. Biscapular protraction force and excursion were measured using a figure-of-8 harness simulating body-powered prosthesis control. Age, sex, anatomical dimensions, and cohorts were compared to determine their potential effects on force and excursion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group demonstrated significantly higher force (4.2 vs 1.0 kg) and excursion (52.6 vs 16.7 mm) than the BPI group. After adjusting for age, sex, and anatomical dimensions, the differences remained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complete BPI patients demonstrated considerably diminished biscapular force and excursion compared to healthy volunteers. These differences illustrate the potential challenges in use of body-powered prostheses in patients with BPI. Patients with BPI may require alternative strategies to exploit contralateral scapular motion to enable use of terminal devices.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Patients with complete BPI exhibit considerably reduced biscapular force and excursion compared to healthy individuals, limiting their potential to operate body-powered prostheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biscapular Protraction Force and Excursion in Adult Patients With Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Y Lee, Andrew W Nelson, Brandon P Sampson, Nicholas Pulos, Robert J Spinner, Alexander Y Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traditional body-powered upper limb prostheses use a Bowden cable to translate shoulder and residual upper limb movements into forces that control the terminal device. The necessary force and excursion required to use a traditional body-powered prosthesis in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) has yet to be ascertained. This study compared the force and excursion generated during biscapular protraction in adults with traumatic BPI compared to healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty nonamputee volunteers, divided into BPI and uninjured control groups and matched for age and sex, were recruited, consented, and comprised the study's cohort. Biscapular protraction force and excursion were measured using a figure-of-8 harness simulating body-powered prosthesis control. Age, sex, anatomical dimensions, and cohorts were compared to determine their potential effects on force and excursion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group demonstrated significantly higher force (4.2 vs 1.0 kg) and excursion (52.6 vs 16.7 mm) than the BPI group. After adjusting for age, sex, and anatomical dimensions, the differences remained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complete BPI patients demonstrated considerably diminished biscapular force and excursion compared to healthy volunteers. These differences illustrate the potential challenges in use of body-powered prostheses in patients with BPI. Patients with BPI may require alternative strategies to exploit contralateral scapular motion to enable use of terminal devices.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Patients with complete BPI exhibit considerably reduced biscapular force and excursion compared to healthy individuals, limiting their potential to operate body-powered prostheses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:传统的身体动力上肢假体使用鲍登电缆将肩部和残余上肢运动转化为控制终端设备的力。创伤性臂丛神经损伤(BPI)患者使用传统体动力假体所需的力和偏移量尚未确定。本研究比较了创伤性BPI成人与健康志愿者在双肩胛拉伸时产生的力和偏移。方法:招募了30名非截肢志愿者,分为BPI组和未受伤对照组,年龄和性别相匹配,经同意,组成了研究的队列。采用模拟人体动力假肢控制的8字形线束测量双轴牵伸力和偏移量。对年龄、性别、解剖尺寸和队列进行比较,以确定其对力和偏移的潜在影响。结果:对照组的力(4.2 vs 1.0 kg)和偏移(52.6 vs 16.7 mm)明显高于BPI组。在调整了年龄、性别和解剖尺寸后,差异仍然存在。结论:与健康志愿者相比,完全BPI患者的双肩关节力和偏移明显减少。这些差异说明了在BPI患者中使用身体动力假体的潜在挑战。BPI患者可能需要其他策略来利用对侧肩胛骨运动来使用终端设备。临床相关性:与健康个体相比,完全性BPI患者表现出明显减少的双肩关节力和偏移,限制了他们操作身体动力假体的潜力。
Biscapular Protraction Force and Excursion in Adult Patients With Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Comparative Study.
Purpose: Traditional body-powered upper limb prostheses use a Bowden cable to translate shoulder and residual upper limb movements into forces that control the terminal device. The necessary force and excursion required to use a traditional body-powered prosthesis in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) has yet to be ascertained. This study compared the force and excursion generated during biscapular protraction in adults with traumatic BPI compared to healthy volunteers.
Methods: Thirty nonamputee volunteers, divided into BPI and uninjured control groups and matched for age and sex, were recruited, consented, and comprised the study's cohort. Biscapular protraction force and excursion were measured using a figure-of-8 harness simulating body-powered prosthesis control. Age, sex, anatomical dimensions, and cohorts were compared to determine their potential effects on force and excursion.
Results: The control group demonstrated significantly higher force (4.2 vs 1.0 kg) and excursion (52.6 vs 16.7 mm) than the BPI group. After adjusting for age, sex, and anatomical dimensions, the differences remained.
Conclusions: Complete BPI patients demonstrated considerably diminished biscapular force and excursion compared to healthy volunteers. These differences illustrate the potential challenges in use of body-powered prostheses in patients with BPI. Patients with BPI may require alternative strategies to exploit contralateral scapular motion to enable use of terminal devices.
Clinical relevance: Patients with complete BPI exhibit considerably reduced biscapular force and excursion compared to healthy individuals, limiting their potential to operate body-powered prostheses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.