新生儿肱骨远端骨骺分离可以不复位骨科治疗。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Malek Brichni, Marine De Tienda, Manon Bachy, Gauthier Caillard, Emeline Bourgeois, Clément Jeandel, Stéphanie Pannier, Marion Delpont
{"title":"新生儿肱骨远端骨骺分离可以不复位骨科治疗。","authors":"Malek Brichni, Marine De Tienda, Manon Bachy, Gauthier Caillard, Emeline Bourgeois, Clément Jeandel, Stéphanie Pannier, Marion Delpont","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis (NSDHE) is a very rare injury. On one hand, anatomical reduction is usually required in pediatric elbow fractures due to limited remodeling potential at the distal humerus. But on the other hand, neonatal fractures often show favorable evolution without reduction, even in cases of severe displacement. NSDHE, often associated with traumatic deliveries, remains underreported, controversial, and its management lacks standardized protocols. Furthermore, its diagnosis can be difficult on X-rays as the distal humeral epiphysis is not ossified at birth. The study questions are: Can non-reduction orthopedic treatment of distal humeral epiphyseal separation yield good clinical and radiological outcomes? Are there risk factors for distal humeral epiphyseal separation? What relevant additional examinations should be performed?</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Orthopedic treatment without reduction may yield satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in NSDHE.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included patients with NSDHE with at least two years of follow-up from four university hospitals. Data on delivery, diagnostic methods, and treatment types were collected. At the last follow-up, joint range of motion, clinical outcomes, and elbow radiographs were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients were included, with a mean age of 8,8 years at the last follow-up (ranging from 2 years to 29 years). All patients underwent an initial elbow radiograph, which was misinterpreted as an elbow dislocation in two cases. Two radiographs were initially deemed normal, necessitating further examinations (ultrasound, arthrography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging). Twelve patients were treated by immobilization without reduction, while two underwent surgical treatment with reduction under general anesthesia and percutaneous pinning. The non-operated patients had complete and symmetrical range of motion without complications, except for one case of resolving cubitus varus. One of the operated patients developed osteitis that required reoperation and also presented with resolving cubitus varus at 4 years old.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Orthopedic treatment through immobilization without reduction appears to be a viable option for neonatal epiphyseal separation of the distal humeral, which are frequently mistaken for elbow dislocations on initial radiographs. Complementary examinations, such as ultrasound, can be useful to confirm the diagnosis. This series yields promising results, although the sample size remains limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis may represent an exception among displaced elbow fractures, as conservative management without reduction can lead to good clinical and radiological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; Retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis can be treated orthopedically without reduction.\",\"authors\":\"Malek Brichni, Marine De Tienda, Manon Bachy, Gauthier Caillard, Emeline Bourgeois, Clément Jeandel, Stéphanie Pannier, Marion Delpont\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis (NSDHE) is a very rare injury. On one hand, anatomical reduction is usually required in pediatric elbow fractures due to limited remodeling potential at the distal humerus. But on the other hand, neonatal fractures often show favorable evolution without reduction, even in cases of severe displacement. NSDHE, often associated with traumatic deliveries, remains underreported, controversial, and its management lacks standardized protocols. Furthermore, its diagnosis can be difficult on X-rays as the distal humeral epiphysis is not ossified at birth. The study questions are: Can non-reduction orthopedic treatment of distal humeral epiphyseal separation yield good clinical and radiological outcomes? Are there risk factors for distal humeral epiphyseal separation? What relevant additional examinations should be performed?</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Orthopedic treatment without reduction may yield satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in NSDHE.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included patients with NSDHE with at least two years of follow-up from four university hospitals. Data on delivery, diagnostic methods, and treatment types were collected. At the last follow-up, joint range of motion, clinical outcomes, and elbow radiographs were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients were included, with a mean age of 8,8 years at the last follow-up (ranging from 2 years to 29 years). All patients underwent an initial elbow radiograph, which was misinterpreted as an elbow dislocation in two cases. Two radiographs were initially deemed normal, necessitating further examinations (ultrasound, arthrography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging). Twelve patients were treated by immobilization without reduction, while two underwent surgical treatment with reduction under general anesthesia and percutaneous pinning. The non-operated patients had complete and symmetrical range of motion without complications, except for one case of resolving cubitus varus. One of the operated patients developed osteitis that required reoperation and also presented with resolving cubitus varus at 4 years old.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Orthopedic treatment through immobilization without reduction appears to be a viable option for neonatal epiphyseal separation of the distal humeral, which are frequently mistaken for elbow dislocations on initial radiographs. Complementary examinations, such as ultrasound, can be useful to confirm the diagnosis. This series yields promising results, although the sample size remains limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis may represent an exception among displaced elbow fractures, as conservative management without reduction can lead to good clinical and radiological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; Retrospective case series.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104382\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿肱骨远端骨骺分离(NSDHE)是一种非常罕见的损伤。一方面,由于肱骨远端重塑潜力有限,儿童肘关节骨折通常需要解剖复位。但另一方面,新生儿骨折往往表现出良好的进化而不复位,即使在严重移位的情况下。NSDHE通常与创伤性分娩有关,目前仍未得到充分报道,存在争议,其管理缺乏标准化的协议。此外,由于肱骨远端骨骺在出生时未骨化,因此在x光上诊断可能很困难。研究的问题是:肱骨远端骨骺分离的非复位矫形治疗能否产生良好的临床和影像学结果?肱骨远端骨骺分离有危险因素吗?需要进行哪些相关的附加检查?假设:不复位的骨科治疗可能会产生令人满意的临床和放射学结果。患者和方法:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了来自四所大学医院的非sdhe患者,随访时间至少为两年。收集了有关分娩、诊断方法和治疗类型的数据。在最后一次随访中,评估关节活动范围、临床结果和肘关节x线片。结果:纳入15例患者,末次随访时平均年龄8.8岁(2 ~ 29岁)。所有患者都接受了最初的肘关节x线片检查,其中两例被误解为肘关节脱位。两张x线片最初认为正常,需要进一步检查(超声、关节摄影、磁共振成像)。12例患者采用不复位固定治疗,2例患者在全麻下经皮钉钉手术复位治疗。除1例肘内翻愈合外,非手术患者活动范围完整对称,无并发症。其中一名手术患者出现骨炎,需要再次手术,并在4岁时出现肘内翻。讨论:对于新生儿肱骨远端骨骺分离,不复位固定的骨科治疗似乎是一种可行的选择,在最初的x线片上经常被误认为肘关节脱位。辅助检查,如超声检查,可用于确认诊断。尽管样本量仍然有限,但这一系列研究产生了令人鼓舞的结果。结论:新生儿肱骨远端骨骺分离可能是移位肘关节骨折中的一个例外,因为保守治疗而不复位可以获得良好的临床和影像学结果。证据等级:四级;回顾性病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis can be treated orthopedically without reduction.

Background: Neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis (NSDHE) is a very rare injury. On one hand, anatomical reduction is usually required in pediatric elbow fractures due to limited remodeling potential at the distal humerus. But on the other hand, neonatal fractures often show favorable evolution without reduction, even in cases of severe displacement. NSDHE, often associated with traumatic deliveries, remains underreported, controversial, and its management lacks standardized protocols. Furthermore, its diagnosis can be difficult on X-rays as the distal humeral epiphysis is not ossified at birth. The study questions are: Can non-reduction orthopedic treatment of distal humeral epiphyseal separation yield good clinical and radiological outcomes? Are there risk factors for distal humeral epiphyseal separation? What relevant additional examinations should be performed?

Hypothesis: Orthopedic treatment without reduction may yield satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in NSDHE.

Patients and methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with NSDHE with at least two years of follow-up from four university hospitals. Data on delivery, diagnostic methods, and treatment types were collected. At the last follow-up, joint range of motion, clinical outcomes, and elbow radiographs were evaluated.

Results: Fifteen patients were included, with a mean age of 8,8 years at the last follow-up (ranging from 2 years to 29 years). All patients underwent an initial elbow radiograph, which was misinterpreted as an elbow dislocation in two cases. Two radiographs were initially deemed normal, necessitating further examinations (ultrasound, arthrography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging). Twelve patients were treated by immobilization without reduction, while two underwent surgical treatment with reduction under general anesthesia and percutaneous pinning. The non-operated patients had complete and symmetrical range of motion without complications, except for one case of resolving cubitus varus. One of the operated patients developed osteitis that required reoperation and also presented with resolving cubitus varus at 4 years old.

Discussion: Orthopedic treatment through immobilization without reduction appears to be a viable option for neonatal epiphyseal separation of the distal humeral, which are frequently mistaken for elbow dislocations on initial radiographs. Complementary examinations, such as ultrasound, can be useful to confirm the diagnosis. This series yields promising results, although the sample size remains limited.

Conclusion: Neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis may represent an exception among displaced elbow fractures, as conservative management without reduction can lead to good clinical and radiological outcomes.

Level of evidence: IV; Retrospective case series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信